The Holy Spirit as feminine: Early Christian testimonies and their interpretationIntroductionIn two previous articles, I discussed the place and role of both the doctrine and the experience of the Holy Spirit in the Early Church (Van Oort 2011; 2012). An important aspect remained, however: namely the fact that many early Christian authors – in particular those belonging to so-called 'Jewish Christianity'1 – spoke of the Holy Spirit as Mother.How did this come to pass? And which consequences may be derived from this phenomenon for present-day discourse on the Holy Spirit?An essential background to the occurrence of the Holy Spirit as Mother is, of course, the fact that the Hebrew word for Spirit, ruach, is in nearly all cases feminine. The first Christians, all of whom were Jews, took this over. Also in Aramaic the word for Spirit, rucha, is feminine. All this, however, does not fully account for the early Jewish Christian practice. A close reading of the relevant texts Jewish Christian sourcesOrigen and the 'Gospel according to the Hebrews'The first prooftext, which already brings in medias res, is from the Greek church father Origen (c. 185–254). In his Commentary on the Gospel of John, he says:
Origen, who in all probability dictated these lines when he was in Palestinian Caesarea, refers to a 'Gospel according to the Hebrews'. Until today there is much discussion about the origin and contents of this Gospel (e.g. Frey 2012:593–606; Luomanen 2012:1–2, 235–243), but all specialists agree that it was of Jewish Christian provenance. Apart from several other things, we learn from this quote that, sometime in the beginning of the second century CE, the Jewish Christians of this Gospel spoke of the Holy Spirit as Mother (mētēr). The same is evident in another quote from Origen:…
From both quotes we may also learn that Origen himself accepted the concept of the Holy Spirit as Mother. Jerome and the 'Gospel according to the Hebrews' |