Dr.
Hovind's $250,000 Offer
formerly $10,000, offered since 1990
I have a standing offer of $250,000 to anyone who
can give any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.* My
$250,000 offer demonstrates that the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more
than a religious belief.
Observed phenomena:
Most thinking people will agree that--
1. A highly ordered universe exists.
2. At least one planet in this complex universe contains an
amazing variety of life forms.
3. Man appears to be the most advanced form of life on this
planet.
Known options:
Choices of how the observed phenomena came into
being--
1. The universe was created by God.
2. The universe always existed.
3. The universe came into being by itself by purely natural
processes (known as evolution) so that no appeal to the supernatural is needed.
Evolution has been acclaimed as being the only process
capable of causing the observed phenomena.
Evolution is presented in our public school
textbooks as a process that:
1. Brought time, space, and matter
into existence from nothing.
2. Organized that matter into the galaxies, stars, and at
least nine planets around the sun. (This process is often referred to as cosmic
evolution.)
3. Created the life that exists on at least one of those
planets from nonliving matter (chemical evolution).
4. Caused the living creatures to be capable of and interested
in reproducing themselves.
5. Caused that first life form to spontaneously diversify into
different forms of living things, such as the plants and animals on the earth
today (biological evolution).
People believe in evolution; they do not know
that it is true. While beliefs are certainly fine to have, it is not fair to
force on the students in our public school system the teaching of one belief,
at taxpayers’ expense. It is my contention that evolutionism is a religious
worldview that is not supported by science, Scripture, popular opinion, or
common sense. The exclusive teaching of this dangerous, mind-altering
philosophy in tax-supported schools, parks, museums, etc., is also a clear
violation of the First Amendment.
How to collect the $250,000:
Prove beyond reasonable doubt that the process of
evolution (option 3 above, under "known options") is the only
possible way the observed phenomena could have come into existence. Only
empirical evidence is acceptable. Persons wishing to collect the $250,000 may
submit their evidence in writing or schedule time for a public presentation. A
committee of trained scientists will provide peer review of the evidence
offered and, to the best of their ability, will be fair and honest in their
evaluation and judgment as to the validity of the evidence presented.
If you are convinced that evolution is an
indisputable fact, may I suggest that you offer $250,000 for any empirical or
historical evidence against the general theory of evolution. This might include
the following:
1. The earth is not billions of
years old (thus destroying the possibility of evolution having happened as it
is being taught).
2. No animal has ever been observed changing into any
fundamentally different kind of animal.
3. No one has ever observed life spontaneously arising from
nonliving matter.
4. Matter cannot make itself out of nothing.
My suggestion:
Proponents of the theory of evolution would do well
to admit that they believe in evolution, but they do not know that it happened
the way they teach. They should call evolution their "faith" or
"religion," and stop including it in books of science. Give up faith
in the silly religion of evolutionism, and trust the God of the Bible (who is
the Creator of this universe and will be your Judge, and mine, one day soon) to
forgive you and to save you from the coming judgment on man’s sin.
* NOTE:
When I use the word evolution, I am not referring to the minor variations found
in all of the various life forms (microevolution). I am referring to the
general theory of evolution which believes these five major events took place
without God:
1.
Time, space, and matter
came into existence by themselves.
2.
Planets and stars
formed from space dust.
3.
Matter created life by
itself.
4.
Early life-forms
learned to reproduce themselves.
5.
Major changes occurred
between these diverse life forms (i.e., fish changed to amphibians, amphibians
changed to reptiles, and reptiles changed to birds or mammals).
Answers to Commonly Asked
Questions about the $250,000 Offer
Students in tax-supported schools are being taught that evolution is a fact. We
are convinced that evolution is a religion masquerading as science and should
not be part of any science curriculum. It has nothing to do with the subject of
science. There are at least six different and unrelated meanings to the word
“evolution” as used in science textbooks.
1.
Cosmic
evolution- the origin of time, space and matter. Big Bang
2.
Chemical
evolution- the origin of higher elements from hydrogen.
3.
Stellar
and planetary evolution- Origin of stars and planets.
4.
Organic
evolution- Origin of life from inanimate matter.
5.
Macroevolution
Origin of major kinds.
6.
Microevolution
Variations within kinds. Only this one has been observed, the first five are
religious. They are believed, by faith, even though there is no empirical
evidence to prove them in any way. While I admire the great faith of the
evolutionists who accept the first five I object to having this religious
propaganda included in with legitimate science at taxpayer’s expense.
Even a quick review of a typical public school textbook will show that students
are being deceived into thinking all six types of evolution above have been
proven because evidence is given for minor variations called micro-evolution.
The first five are smuggled in when no one is watching.
This deception is a classic case of bait and switch. One definition of
evolution (such as “descent with modification”) is given and the others are
assumed to be true by association. The first five meanings are believed by
faith, have never been observed and are religious. Only the last one is
scientific. It is also what the Bible predicted would happen. The animals and
plants would bring forth “after their kind” in Genesis 1.
Many have responded to my offer of $250,000 for scientific proof for evolution.
The terms and conditions of the offer are detailed very clearly on my web site www.drdino.com. Here are
some answers to some commonly asked questions.
1.
The
offer is legitimate. A wealthy friend of mine has the money in the bank. If the
conditions of the offer are met, the money will be paid out immediately. My
word is good.
2.
The
members of the committee of scientists that will judge the evidence are all
highly trained, have advanced degrees in science as well as many years of
experience in their field. For example: there is a zoologist, a geologist, an
aerospace engineer, a professor of radiology and biophysics, and an expert in radio
metric dating to name a few. They are busy people and do not wish to waste time
on foolish responses. Nor do they wish to waste time arguing with skeptics and
scoffers who seem to have nothing else to do than ask silly questions when they
really don’t want answers (so far this has been the typical response to the
offer). I will not reveal their names for this reason. Any legitimate evidence
will be forward to them and they will respond. At that time they may identify
themselves if they choose. The merit of the evidence presented and the
reasonableness of their response does not depend on who they are.
3.
Evidence
of minor changes within the same kind of plant or animal does not qualify as
evidence and will not be sent to the committee to waste their time. For
example, doubling the chromosome number of a sterile hybrid does not add
additional genetic information; it duplicates what is already present in the
parent plant. Because of the absence of additional genetic information the
resultant plant can't be classified as different or new species. The plant may
differ in a number of ways - bigger, vigorous as observed in any polyploid
plants. Such easily recognizable phenotypic changes have confused many. Some
evolutionists have jumped to the conclusion that a new species has been
evolved. The key is that no new genetic information has been added. Even a new
“species” is not proof for evolution as the offer calls for. See the conditions
of the $250,000 offer on the web site. Some have insisted on a precise definition
of the word “kind”. The Bible defines “kind” as those that are able to “bring
forth” or reproduce. Those animals that were originally able to reproduce were
of the same kind. There may be diversity now, 6000 years later, that could
cause some varieties of the original kind to not be able to reproduce now. For
example, I understand that rabbits from Alaska cannot breed with rabbits from
Florida yet they are still the same kind of animal. It is obvious that a dog
and a wolf are the same “kind” of animal (they are currently classed as
different “species” yet are inter-fertile-- hmmm, what is the precise
definition of “species”?) where a dog and a fish are not. While there may be
some blurry areas that would be worthy of research in defining the original kinds,
rather than muddy the issue with these type questions it would be wise to focus
on the obvious cases like the dog/fish comparison. These are obviously
different “kinds” of animals. So, for the sake of clarity, prove the dog and
the fish evolved from a common ancestor. The honest scientist would be wise to
admit that no evidence exists that could begin to prove the dog and the fish
have a common ancestor. He may believe that they are related but that is not
science and that is my point in the offer. Some believe this type of evolution
happens but it should not be presented to innocent students as a “fact”.
Further, it certainly is not evidence that the other four definitions of
evolution have occurred.
4.
The
idea that the majority of scientists believe in the theory is not evidence
either. Majority opinion is often wrong and must be corrected. History is full
of examples.
5.
Anonymous
letters will be ignored.
Rather than simply sending in scientific evidence for evolution, some have
wasted lots of their time and mine sending letters demanding to know who is on
the committee, what bank account the money is in, asking Bill Clinton type
questions about the definition of words like “is”, etc. When I do not respond
the way they want me to they post notices on their web sites claiming that I
owe them the money or that the offer is a sham! It is obvious they are using
the Red Herring tactic to draw attention away from the fact that they have no
evidence to support the religion of evolution. I tell everyone who inquires, if
you have some evidence, send it in, don’t beat around the bush. Give us the
best you have on the first try please to save time.
Many have offered evidence of microevolution and assumed that the other 5
meanings of the word are somehow magically connected. They don’t seem to
realize that they are blinded to the obvious. Treat the $250,000 offer as a
lawyer would treat a ‘who-done-it’ case. It is your job to prove that what is
being taught to our kids as fact (all six meanings of the word evolution
above), is indeed a fact. If this cannot be done then it should be admitted
that evolution is a religion but not a science. Some say it is unfair to define
evolution including the origin of the universe. They say it only has to do with
“change in gene frequency over time.” All you need to do is read your local
textbook and see that all 6 meanings of the word are part of what is taught as
evolution theory. If these nay Sayers are agreeing that it should not be
included then they should help me get it out of the books, if they are genuine.
Over the years I have heard many evolutionists say, “Evolution is a theory like
gravity is a theory. Don’t you believe in gravity?” They repeat this mantra as
if repetition will make it true. Their example is silly of course. We can all
observe gravity every moment of our lives. We can do tests and experiments to
verify the theory of gravity. No one has ever seen an exception to it. By the
same token, no one has ever observed evolution nor been able to demonstrate any
evolution beyond minor variations within the kind. To try to make evolution
science by associating it with theories like gravity is ridiculous.
Nearly all responses to my $250,000 offer go something like this: “Of course no
one can prove evolution, can you prove creation?” This response is what I
expected and wanted. Neither theory of origins can be proven. Both involve a
great deal of faith in the unseen. So my next logical question is: “Why do I
have to pay for the evolution religion to be taught to all the students in the
tax supported school system?” Since all taxpayers are being forced to pay for
evolution to be taught exclusively in public schools and evolutionists have had
the last 130 years and billions of dollars in research grants to prove their religion,
the burden of proof is on them to supply proof of their theory.
I do not have time or interest in getting involved in long e-mail debates, but
I will talk to anyone by phone or debate with any qualified scientist (even a
panel of evolutionists) in a public forum at a university, on radio or TV, as
long as there is equal time for each position not each person. If you call,
please have a list of topics to discuss or questions to ask and feel free to
record the conversation if you like. Just inform me that you are recording
please. I hope this response is satisfactory.
I have taught for years that evolution is nothing but a religion mixed in with
real science. Many have been duped into believing in it. There is no evidence
that any plant or animal ever can or did change to any other kind or creature.
It is time that intelligent people the world over began to admit that the king
has no clothes! There is no evidence for changes between kinds of animals. The
Bible teaches that God made them to “bring forth after their kind.” This is all
that has ever been observed. The same Bible teaches that everyone will face the
Creator one day to be judged for everything they have said, done or thought. I
recommend that everyone prepare for that day by taking advantage of God’s mercy
and forgiveness afforded through the free salvation offered to any who will
confess their sin and receive Jesus Christ as their Lord. If you are interested
in learning more about becoming a Christian, please call me. I travel a lot but
always take time for calls when I am in the office. I am most often in
Wednesday through Friday at 850-479-3466. Check my itinerary on my web site for
my location if you need to talk with me while I am out speaking. If possible,
attend a seminar. Seminars are free and we always have a question answer time
for those who attend.
Sincerely,
Kent Hovind