Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter IV.—Opinions of Pythagoras and Epicurus. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter IV.—Opinions of Pythagoras
and Epicurus.
Then, in regular succession from
another starting-point, Pythagoras the Samian, son of Mnesarchus, calls
numbers, with their proportions and harmonies, and the elements composed
of both, the first principles; and he includes also unity and the
indefinite binary.2519
2519
μονάδα καὶ τὴν ἀόριστον δυάδα. One, or
unity, was considered by Pythagoras as the essence of number, and also as
God. Two, or the indefinite binary, was the equivalent of evil. So
Plutarch, De placit. philosoph., c. 7; from which treatise the
above opinions of the various sects are quoted, generally
verbatim. | Epicurus, an Athenian, the son of
Neocles, says that the first principles of the things that exist are
bodies perceptible by reason, admitting no vacuity,2520
2520 ἀμέτοχα
κενοῦ: the void being
that in which these bodies move, while they themselves are of a different
nature from it. | unbegotten, indestructible, which can
neither be broken, nor admit of any formation of their parts, nor
alteration, and are therefore perceptible by reason. Empedocles of
Agrigentum,
son of Meton, maintained that there were four
elements—fire, air, water, earth; and two elementary powers
—love and hate,2521
2521
Or, accord and discord, attraction and repulsion. | of which
the former is a power of union, the latter of separation. You see, then,
the confusion of those who are considered by you to have been wise men,
whom you assert to be your teachers of religion: some of them declaring
that water is the first principle of all things; others, air others,
fire; and others, some other of these fore-mentioned elements; and all of
them employing persuasive arguments for the establishment of their own
errors, and attempting to prove their own peculiar dogma to be the most
valuable. These things were said by them. How then, ye men of Greece, can
it be safe for those who desire to be saved, to fancy that they can learn
the true religion from these philosophers, who were neither able so to
convince themselves as to prevent sectarian wrangling with one another,
and not to appear definitely opposed to one another’s opinions?E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|