Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Other Beings Besides God are in Scripture Called God. This Objection Frivolous, for It is Not a Question of Names. The Divine Essence is the Thing at Issue. Heresy, in Its General Terms, Thus Far Treated. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter VII.—Other
Beings Besides God are in Scripture Called God. This Objection
Frivolous, for It is Not a Question of Names. The Divine Essence is the
Thing at Issue. Heresy, in Its General Terms, Thus Far
Treated.
But this argument you will try to shake with an
objection from the name of God, by alleging that that name is a
vague2400 one, and applied to other beings also; as it
is written, “God standeth in the congregation of the
mighty;2401
2401 לא”־תרַעַבְּ.
Tertullian’s version is: In ecclesia deorum. The Vulgate:
In synagoga deorum. | He judgeth among
the gods.” And again, “I have said, Ye are
gods.”2402 As therefore the
attribute of supremacy would be inappropriate to these, although they
are called gods, so is it to the Creator. This is a foolish objection;
and my answer to it is, that its author fails to consider that quite as
strong an objection might be urged against the (superior) god of
Marcion: he too is called god, but is not on that account proved to be
divine, as neither are angels nor men, the Creator’s
handiwork. If an identity of names affords a presumption in
support of equality of condition, how often do worthless menials strut
insolently in the names of kings—your Alexanders, Cæsars,
and Pompeys!2403
2403 The now less obvious
nicknames of “Alex. Darius and Olofernes,” are in the
text. | This fact,
however, does not detract
from the real attributes of the royal persons. Nay more, the very
idols of the Gentiles are called gods. Yet not one of them is divine
because he is called a god. It is not, therefore, for the name of god,
for its sound or its written form, that I am claiming the supremacy in
the Creator, but for the essence2404 to which the
name belongs; and when I find that essence alone is unbegotten and
unmade—alone eternal, and the maker of all things—it is not
to its name, but its state, not to its designation, but its condition,
that I ascribe and appropriate the attribute of the supremacy.
And so, because the essence to which I ascribe it has come2405 to be called god, you suppose that I ascribe
it to the name, because I must needs use a name to express the essence,
of which indeed that Being consists who is called God, and who is
accounted the great Supreme because of His essence, not from His name.
In short, Marcion himself, when he imputes this character to his god,
imputes it to the nature,2406 not to the word.
That supremacy, then, which we ascribe to God in consideration of His
essence, and not because of His name, ought, as we maintain, to be
equal2407 in both the beings who consist of that
substance for which the name of God is given; because, in as far as
they are called gods (i.e. supreme beings, on the strength, of
course, of their unbegotten and eternal, and therefore great and
supreme essence), in so far the attribute of being the great Supreme
cannot be regarded as less or worse in one than in another great
Supreme. If the happiness, and sublimity, and perfection2408 of the Supreme Being shall hold good of
Marcion’s god, it will equally so of ours; and if not of ours, it
will equally not hold of Marcion’s. Therefore two supreme
beings will be neither equal nor unequal: not equal, because the
principle which we have just expounded, that the Supreme Being admits
of no comparison with Himself, forbids it; not unequal, because another
principle meets us respecting the Supreme Being, that He is capable of
no diminution. So, Marcion, you are caught2409 in
the midst of your own Pontic tide. The waves of truth overwhelm
you on every side. You can neither set up equal gods nor unequal ones.
For there are not two; so far as the question of number is
properly concerned. Although the whole matter of the two gods is at
issue, we have yet confined our discussion to certain bounds, within
which we shall now have to contend about separate
peculiarities.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|