Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| The Earthy Material of Which Flesh is Created Wonderfully Improved by God's Manipulation. By the Addition of the Soul in Man's Constitution It Became the Chief Work in the Creation. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter VII.—The
Earthy Material of Which Flesh is Created Wonderfully Improved by
God’s Manipulation. By the Addition of the Soul in Man’s
Constitution It Became the Chief Work in the Creation.
But perhaps the dignity of the flesh may seem to
be diminished, because it has not been actually manipulated by the hand
of God, as the clay was at first. Now, when God handled the clay
for the express purpose of the growth of flesh out of it afterwards, it
was for the flesh that He took all the trouble. But I want you,
moreover, to know at what time and in what manner the flesh flourished
into beauty out of its clay. For it cannot be, as some will have
it, that those “coats of skins”7332
which Adam and Eve put on when they were stripped of paradise, were
really themselves the forming of the flesh out of clay,7333
7333 A Valentinian
notion. | because long before that Adam had already
recognised the flesh which was in the woman as the propagation of his
own substance (“This is now bone of my bone, and flesh of my
flesh”7334 ), and the very
taking of the woman out of the man was supplemented with flesh; but it
ought, I should suppose, to have been made good with clay, if Adam was
still clay. The clay, therefore, was obliterated and absorbed into
flesh. When did this happen? At the time that man became a
living soul by the inbreathing of God—by the breath indeed which
was capable of hardening clay into another substance, as into some
earthenware, so now into flesh. In the same way the potter, too, has it
in his power, by tempering the blast of his fire, to modify his clayey
material into a stiffer one, and to mould one form after another more
beautiful than the original substance, and now possessing both a kind
and name of its own. For although the Scripture says, “Shall the
clay say to the potter?”7335 that is, Shall man
contend with God? although the apostle speaks of “earthen
vessels”7336 he refers to man,
who was originally clay. And the vessel is the flesh, because
this was made of clay by the breath of the divine
afflatus; and it was afterwards clothed with “the
coats of skins,” that is, with the cutaneous covering which was
placed over it. So truly is this the fact, that if you withdraw the
skin, you lay bare the flesh. Thus, that which becomes a spoil
when stripped off, was a vestment as long as it remained laid over.
Hence the apostle, when he call circumcision “a putting off (or
spoliation) of the flesh,”7337 affirmed the
skin to be a coat or tunic. Now this being the case, you have
both the clay made glorious by the hand of God, and the flesh more
glorious still by His breathing upon it, by virtue of which the flesh
not only laid aside its clayey rudiments, but also took on itself the
ornaments of the soul. You surely are not more careful than God,
that you indeed should refuse to mount the gems of Scythia and
India and the pearls of the Red Sea in lead, or brass, or iron, or even
in silver, but should set them in the most precious and most
highly-wrought gold; or, again, that you should provide for your finest
wines and most costly unguents the most fitting vessels; or, on the
same principle, should find for your swords of finished temper
scabbards of equal worth; whilst God must consign to some vilest
sheath the shadow of His own soul, the breath of His own Spirit, the
operation of His own mouth, and by so ignominious a consignment secure,
of course, its condemnation. Well, then, has He placed, or rather
inserted and commingled, it with the flesh? Yes; and so intimate is the
union, that it may be deemed to be uncertain whether the flesh bears
about the soul, or the soul the flesh; or whether the flesh acts as
apparitor to the soul, or the soul to the flesh. It is, however,
more credible that the soul has service rendered to it,7338 and has the
mastery,7339 as being more
proximate in character to God.7340 This circumstance
even redounds to the glory of the flesh, inasmuch as it both contains
an essence nearest to God’s, and renders itself a partaker of
(the soul’s) actual sovereignty. For what enjoyment of nature is
there, what produce of the world, what relish of the elements, which is
not imparted to the soul by means of the body? How can it be otherwise?
Is it not by its means that the soul is supported by the entire
apparatus of the senses—the sight, the hearing, the taste, the
smell, the touch? Is it not by its means that it has a sprinkling of
the divine power, there being nothing which it does not effect by its
faculty of speech, even when it is only tacitly indicated? And speech
is the result of a fleshly organ. The arts come through the flesh;
through the flesh also effect is given to the mind’s pursuits and
powers; all work, too, and business and offices of life, are
accomplished by the flesh; and so utterly are the living acts of the
soul the work of the flesh, that for the soul to cease to do living
acts, would be nothing else than sundering itself from the flesh. So
also the very act of dying is a function of the flesh, even as the
process of life is. Now, if all things are subject to the soul through
the flesh, their subjection is equally due to the flesh. That which is
the means and agent of your enjoyment, must needs be also the partaker
and sharer of your enjoyment. So that the flesh, which is accounted the
minister and servant of the soul, turns out to be also its associate
and co-heir. And if all this in temporal things, why not also in things
eternal?E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|