Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter XLVIII PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
XLVIII.
In the next place, as if he had devoted himself
solely to the manifestation of his hatred and dislike of the Jewish and
Christian doctrine, he says: “The more modest of Jewish and
Christian writers give all these things an allegorical meaning;”
and, “Because they are ashamed of these things, they take refuge
in allegory.” Now one might say to him, that if we must
admit fables and fictions, whether written with a concealed meaning or
with any other object, to be shameful narratives when taken in their
literal acceptation,3908
3908 κατὰ τὴν
πρώτην
ἐκδοχήν. | of what histories
can this be said more truly than of the Grecian? In these
histories, gods who are sons castrate the gods who are their fathers,
and gods who are parents devour their own children, and a
goddess-mother gives to the “father of gods and men” a
stone to swallow instead of his own son, and a father has intercourse
with his daughter, and a wife binds her own husband, having as her
allies in the work the brother of the fettered god and his own
daughter! But why should I enumerate these absurd stories of the
Greeks regarding their gods, which are most shameful in themselves,
even though invested with an allegorical meaning? (Take the
instance) where Chrysippus of Soli, who is considered to be an ornament
of the Stoic sect, on account of his numerous and learned treatises,
explains a picture at Samos, in which Juno was represented as
committing unspeakable abominations with Jupiter. This reverend
philosopher says in his treatises, that matter receives the spermatic
words3909
3909 τοὺς
σπερματικοὺς
λόγους. | of the god, and retains them within herself,
in order to ornament the universe. For in the picture at Samos
Juno represents matter, and Jupiter god. Now it is on account of
these, and of countless other similar fables, that we would not even in
word call the God of all things Jupiter, or the sun Apollo, or the moon
Diana. But we offer to the Creator a worship which is pure, and
speak with religious respect of His noble works of creation, not
contaminating even in word the things of God; approving of the language
of Plato in the Philebus, who would not admit that pleasure was
a goddess, “so great is my reverence, Protarchus,” he says,
“for the very names of the gods.” We verily entertain
such reverence for the name of God, and for His noble works of
creation, that we would not, even under pretext of an allegorical meaning, admit any
fable which might do injury to the young.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|