Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Introductory Notice. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Introductory Notice
to
Methodius.
————————————
[a.d.
260–312]. Considering the strong language in which
Methodius is praised by ancient writers, as well as by the moderns, I
feel that our learned translator has too hastily dismissed his name and
works in the biographical introduction below. Epiphanius makes
great use of him in his refutations of Origen; and Dupin’s
critical and historical notice of him is prolonged and highly
discriminating, furnishing an abridgment of all his writings and of
those vulgarly attributed to him heretofore.2487
2487
[In Dr. Schaff’s History (vol. ii. p. 809) is just
such a notice and outline as would be appropriate here.] | I have made into an elucidation
some references which may be of use to the student. In like
manner, I have thrown into the form of notes and elucidations what
would be less pertinent and less useful in a preface. There are
no facts to be added to what is here given by the translator; and
remarks on the several works, which he has too sparingly annotated,
will be more conveniently bestowed, perhaps, on the pages to which they
immediately refer. The following is the translator’s brief
but useful
Introduction.
Methodius, who is also called Eubulius,2488
2488
St. Epiph. Hæres., 64, sec. 63. [But this seems
only his nom de plume, assumed in his fiction of the
Banquet.] | was, first
of all bishop, simultaneously of Olympus and Patara, in Lycia, as is
testified by several ancient writers.2489
2489
St. Hieronymus, De viris illustr., c. 83. | He was afterwards removed,
according to St. Jerome, to the episcopal See of Tyre in Phœnicia,
and at the end of the latest of the great persecutions of the Church,
about the year 312, he suffered martyrdom at Chalcis in Greece.
Some consider that it was at Chalcis in Syria, and that St.
Jerome’s testimony ought to be thus understood, as Syria was more
likely to be the scene of his martyrdom that Greece, as being nearer to
his diocese. Others affirm that he suffered under Decius and
Valerian; but this is incorrect, since he wrote not only against Origen
long after the death of Adamantius, but also against Porphyry, whilst
he was alive, in the reign of Diocletian.
Methodius is known chiefly as the antagonist of
Origen; although, as has been pointed out, he was himself influenced in
no small degree by the method of Origen, as may be seen by his tendency
to allegorical interpretations of Holy Scripture. The only
complete work of this writer which has come down to us is his
Banquet of the Ten Virgins, a dialogue of considerable power and
grace, in praise of the virginal life. His antagonism to Origen,
however, comes out less in this than in his works On the
Resurrection, and On Things Created. The treatise
On Free Will is, according to recent critics, of doubtful
authorship, although the internal evidence must be said to confirm the
ancient testimonies which assign it to Methodius. His writings
against Porphyry, with the exception of some slight fragments, are
lost, as are also his exegetical writings.2490
2490
For the larger fragments we are indebted to Epiphanius
(Hæres., 64) and Photius (Bibliotheca,
234–237). |
Combefis
published an edition of his works in 1644; but only so much of the
Banquet as was contained in the Bibliotheca of
Photius. In 1656 Leo Allatius published for the first time a
complete edition of this work at Rome from the Vatican ms. Combefis in 1672 published an edition founded
chiefly upon this; and his work has become the basis of all subsequent
reprints.
The following translation has been made almost
entirely from the text of Migne, which is generally accurate, and the
arrangement of which has been followed throughout. The edition of
Jahn in some places rearranges the more fragmentary works, especially
that On the Resurrection; but, although his text was
occasionally found useful in amending the old readings, and in
improving the punctuation, it was thought better to adhere in general
to the text which is best known.
A writer who was pronounced by St.
Epiphanius2491
2491
Epiph., Hær., 64, sec. 63. ἀνὴρ
λόγιος καὶ
σφόδρα περὶ
τῆς ἀληθείας
ἀγωνισάμενος.
[Petavius renders this: “vir apprime doetus acerrimusque
veritatis patronus.”] | to be “a
learned man and a most valiant defender of the truth,” and by St.
Jerome, disertissimus martyr,2492
2492
Hieron., Com. in Dan., c. 13. | who elsewhere speaks of him as one who
nitidi compositique sermonis libros confecit,2493
2493
Id., De vir. ill., c. 83. Many more such testimonies
will be found collected in the various editions of his works in
Greek. | cannot be altogether unworthy the
attention of the nineteenth century.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|