Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| General Note. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
General Note.
————————————
The Banquet appears
to me a genuine work, although, like other writings of this Father, it
may have been corrupted. Tokens of such corruptions are not
wanting, and there can be little doubt that Methodius the monkish
artist and missionary of the ninth century has been often copied into
the works of his earlier namesake.2981
2981
Murdock’s Mosheim, Eccles. Hist., ii. 51. |
In a fragment, for example, found on a preceding
page,2982
2982 P.
369, note 4, supra. | there is a
passage on God’s image in angels and men, which appears in its
more probable form in another fragment,2983
2983
The Jonah Fragment, p. 378, supra. | discovered by Combefis. As
quoted by St. John Damascene, it is enough to say of it, with the
candid Dupin, “I very much question whether the passage
belongs to Methodius; or, if it does, it must be taken in another
sense2984
2984
The sense, that is, of the golden image of God in angels, and
“in clay or brass, as ourselves.” See p.
378, supra. | than that in
which Damascene understood it, as the words which immediately precede
seem to intimate.” That it is a positive anachronism
in any other sense, is proved by the history of Images, on which see
Epiphanius, quoted by Faber, Difficulties of Romanism, p. 488,
ed. 1830. He gives St. Jerome, Opp., ii. p. 177. A
learned friend suggests that the Rev. J. Endell Tyler’s popular
work on Primitive Christian Worship may supply an accessible
reference.2985
2985 See
pp. 131, 132, edition of the London Society for the Promotion of
Christian Knowledge. | It is a
very good thought, for the whole book is worth reading, on other points
also.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|