47. But, you say, if God is
not the parent and father of souls, by what sire have they been
begotten, and how have they been produced? If you wish to hear
unvarnished statements not spun out with vain ostentation of words, we,
too,3733
3733
So the ms. and all edd.; but Orelli would
change item into iterum, not seeing that the
reference is to the indicated preference of his opponents for the
simple truth. |
admit that
we are ignorant of this, do not know it;
3734
3734
Nescire Hildebrand, with good reason, considers a gloss. |
and we hold that, to know so great a
matter, is not only beyond the reach of our
weakness and frailty, but
beyond that also of all the powers which are in the
world, and
which have usurped the place of deities in men’s belief.
But are we bound to show whose they are, because we deny that they are
God’s? That by no means
3735
3735
Nihilfor the ms.
mihi which makes nonsense of the sentence. |
follows necessarily; for if we were to
deny that
flies, beetles, and bugs, dormice, weevils, and
moths,
3736
3736
This somewhat wide-spread opinion found an amusing counterpart in
the doctrines of Rorarius (mentioned by Bayle, Dict. Phil.), who
affirmed that the lower animals are gifted with reason and speech, as
we are. |
are made by
the Almighty King, we should not be required in consequence to say who
made and formed them; for without
incurring any censure, we may
not know who, indeed, gave them being, and
yet assert that not
by the Supreme
3737
Deity
were
creatures produced so useless, so needless, so
purposeless,
3738
3738
Lit., “tending to no reasons.” |
nay more,
at times even hurtful, and causing unavoidable
injuries.
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH