Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| That Man’s Transgression Did Not Annul the Blessing of Fecundity Pronounced Upon Man Before He Sinned But Infected It with the Disease of Lust. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter 21.—That Man’s
Transgression Did Not Annul the Blessing of Fecundity Pronounced
Upon Man Before He Sinned But Infected It with the Disease of
Lust.
Far be it, then, from us to suppose
that our first parents in Paradise felt that lust which caused them
afterwards to blush and hide their nakedness, or that by its means
they should have fulfilled the benediction of God, “Increase and
multiply and replenish the earth;”750 for it was after sin that lust
began. It was after sin that our nature, having lost the power it
had over the whole body, but not having lost all shame, perceived,
noticed, blushed at, and covered it. But that blessing upon
marriage, which encouraged them to increase and multiply and
replenish the earth, though it continued even after they had
sinned, was yet given before they sinned, in order that the
procreation of children might be recognized as part of the glory of
marriage, and not of the punishment of sin. But now, men being
ignorant of the blessedness of Paradise, suppose that children
could not have been begotten there in any other way than they know
them to be begotten now, i.e., by lust, at which even
honorable marriage blushes; some not simply rejecting, but
sceptically deriding the divine Scriptures, in which we read that
our first parents, after they sinned, were ashamed of their
nakedness, and covered it; while others, though they accept and
honor Scripture, yet conceive that this expression, “Increase and
multiply,” refers not to carnal fecundity, because a similar
expression is used of the soul in the words, “Thou wilt multiply
me with strength in my soul;”751 and so, too, in the words which
follow in Genesis, “And replenish the earth, and subdue it,”
they understand by the earth the body which the soul fills with its
presence, and which it rules over when it is multiplied in
strength. And they hold that children could no more then than now
be begotten without lust, which, after sin, was kindled, observed,
blushed for, and covered; and even that children would not have
been born in Paradise, but only outside of it, as in fact it turned
out. For it was after they were expelled from it that they came
together to beget children, and begot them.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|