Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Clement of Alexandria. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
VI.—Clement of
Alexandria.
Clement1803
1803 This chapter has no connection with the preceding, and its
insertion at this point has no good ground, for Clement has been
already handled in the fifth book; and if Eusebius wished to refer to
him again in connection with Origen, he should have done so in chap. 3,
where Origen’s appointment as head of the catechetical school is
mentioned. (Redepenning, however, approves the present order; vol. I.
p. 431 sqq.) Rufinus felt the inconsistency, and hence inserted chaps.
6 and 7 in the middle of chap. 3, where the account of Origen’s
appointment by Demetrius is given. Valesius considers the occurrence of
this mention of Clement at this point a sign that Eusebius did not give
his work a final revision. Chap. 13 is inserted in the same abrupt way,
quite out of harmony with the context. Upon the life of Clement of
Alexandria, see Bk. V. chap. 11, note 1. The catechetical school was
vacant, as we learn from chap. 2, in the year 203, and was then taken
in charge by Origen, so that the “that time” referred to by
Eusebius in this sentence must be carried back of the events related in
the previous chapters. The cause of Clement’s leaving the school
was probably the persecution begun by Severus in 202 (“all were
driven away by the threatening aspect of persecution,” according
to chap. 3, §1); for since Origen was one of his pupils he can
hardly have left long before that time. That it was not unworthy
cowardice which led Clement to take his departure is clear enough from
the words of Alexander in chaps. 11 and 14, from the high reputation
which he continued to enjoy throughout the Church, and from his own
utterances on the subject of martyrdom scattered through his
works. | having succeeded
Pantænus,1804
1804 On
Pantænus, see Bk. V. chap. 10, note 2. | had charge at
that time of the catechetical instruction in Alexandria, so that Origen
also, while still a boy,1805
1805 Stephanus, Stroth, Burton, Schwegler, Laemmer, and Heinichen,
following two important mss. and the
translation of Rufinus, omit the words παῖδα ὄντα
“while a boy.” But the words are found in
all the other codices (the chief witnesses of two of the three great
families of mss. being for them) and in
Nicephorus. The manuscript authority is therefore overwhelmingly in
favor of the words, and they are adopted by Valesius, Zimmermann, and
Crusè. Rufinus is a strong witness against the words but, as
Redepenning justly remarks, having inserted this chapter, as he did, in
the midst of the description of Origen’s early years (see note
1), the words παῖδα ὄντα
would be quite superfluous and even out of place, and
hence he would naturally omit them. So far as the probabilities of the
insertion or omission of the words in the present passage are
concerned, it seems to me more natural to suppose that a copyist,
finding the words at this late stage in the account of Origen’s
life, would be inclined to omit them, than that not finding them there
he should, upon historical grounds (which he could have reached only
after some reflection), think that they ought to be inserted. The
latter would be not only a more difficult but also a much graver step
than the former. There seems, then, to be no good warrant for omitting
these words. We learn from chap. 3 that he took charge of the
catechetical school when he was in his eighteenth year, within a year
therefore after the death of his father. And we learn that before he
took charge of the school, all who had given instruction there had been
driven away by the persecution. Clement, therefore, must have left
before Origen’s eighteenth year, and hence the latter must have
studied with him before the persecution had broken up the school, and
in all probability before the death of Leonides. In any case,
therefore, he was still a boy when under Clement, and even if we omit
the words—“while a boy”—here, we shall not be
warranted in putting his student days into the period of his maturity,
as some would do. Upon this subject, see Redepenning, I. p. 431 sqq.,
who adduces still other arguments for the position taken in this note
which it is not necessary to repeat here. | was one of his
pupils. In the first book of the work called Stromata, which Clement wrote, he
gives a chronological table,1806
1806 In
Stromata, Bk. I. chap. 21. On this and the other works of
Clement, see chap. 13. | bringing events
down to the death of Commodus. So it is evident that that work was
written during the reign of Severus, whose times we are now
recording.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|