Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| The Dissension of the Arabians. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
XXXVII.—The Dissension of the
Arabians.2054
2054 The
exact nature of the heresy which is here described by Eusebius is
somewhat difficult to determine. It is disputed whether these heretics
are to be reckoned with the θνητοπσυχίται
(whom John of Damascus mentions in his de
Hæres. c. 90, and to whom Augustine refers, under the name of
Arabici, in his de Hæres, c. 83), that is, those who
taught the death of the soul with the body, or with the ὑπνοψυχίται, who taught that the soul slept between the death and the
resurrection of the body. Redepenning, in a very thorough discussion of
the matter (II. 105 sq.), concludes that the heresy to which Eusebius
refers grew up under Jewish influence, which was very strong in Arabia,
and that it did not teach the death (as Eusebius asserts), but only the
slumber of the soul. He reckons them therefore with the second, not the
first, class mentioned. But it seems to me that Redepenning is almost
hypercritical in maintaining that it is impossible that these heretics
can have taught that the soul died and afterward was raised again; for
it is no more impossible that they should have taught it than that
Eusebius and others should have supposed that they did. In fact, there
does not seem to be adequate ground for correcting Eusebius’
statement, which describes heretics who must distinctly be classed with
the θνητοπσυχίται
mentioned later by John of Damascus. We do not know
the date at which the synod referred to in this chapter was held. We
only know that it was subsequent to the one which dealt with Beryllus,
and therefore it must have been toward the close of Philip’s
reign. |
About the same time others arose in Arabia, putting forward a doctrine
foreign to the truth. They said that during the present time the human
soul dies and perishes with the body, but that at the time of the
resurrection they will be renewed together. And at that time also a
synod of considerable size assembled, and Origen, being again invited
thither, spoke publicly on the question with such effect that the
opinions of those who had formerly fallen were changed. E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|