Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| About Eusebius, Bishop of Samosata. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter XXVIII.—About Eusebius, Bishop of
Samosata.
The admirable Eusebius mentioned above, who was entrusted with the
common resolution, when he beheld the violation of the covenant,
returned to his own see. Then certain men who were uneasy about the
written document, persuaded Constantius to dispatch a messenger to
recover it. Accordingly the emperor sent one of the officers who ride
post with relays of horses, and bring communications with great speed.
On his arrival he reported the imperial message, but, “I
cannot,” said the admirable Eusebius, “surrender the deed
deposited with me till I am directed so to do by the whole assembly who
gave it me.” This reply was reported to the emperor. Boiling with
rage he sent to Eusebius again and ordered him to give it up, with the
further message that he had ordered his right hand to be cut off if he
refused. But he only wrote this to terrify the bishop, for the courier
who conveyed the dispatch had orders not to carry out the threat. But
when the divine Eusebius opened the letter and saw the punishment which
the emperor had threatened, he stretched out his right hand and his
left, bidding the man cut off both. “The decree,” said he,
“which is a clear proof of Arian wickedness, I will not give
up.”
When Constantius had been
informed of this courageous resolution he was struck with astonishment,
and did not cease to admire it; for even foes are constrained by the
greatness of bold deeds to admire their adversaries success.
At this time Constantius learned
that Julian, whom he had declared Cæsar of Europe, was aiming at
sovereignty, and mustering an army against his master. Therefore he set
out from Syria, and died in Cilicia.594
594 Constantius died at Mopsucrene, on the Cydnus, according to
Socrates and the Chron. Alex., on Nov. 3, 361. Socrates (ii. 47)
ascribes his illness to chagrin at the successes of Julian, and says
that he died in the 46th year of his age and 39th of his reign, having
for thirteen years been associated in the empire with his Father.
Ammianus (xxi. 15, 2) writes, “Venit Tarsum, ubi leviore febri
contactus, ratusque itinerario motu imminutae valetudinis excuti posse
discrimen, petiit per vias difficiles Mopsucrenas, Cillciae ultimam
hinc pergentibus stationem, sub Tauri montis radicibus positam:
egredique sequuto die conatus, invalenti morbi gravitate detentus est:
paulatimque urente calore nimio venas, ut ne tangi quidem corpus eius
posset in modum foculi fervens, cum usus deficeret medelarum, ultimum
spirans deflebat exitium; mentisque sensu tum etiam integro,
successorem suae potestatis statuisse dicitur Julianum. Deinde anhelitu
iam pulsatus letali conticuit diuque cum anima colluctatus iam
discessura, abiit e vita III. Non. Octobrium, (i.e. Oct. 5—a
different date from that given by others) imperii vitaeque anno
quadragesimo et mensibus paucis.” His Father having died in 337,
Constantius really reigned 24 years alone, and if we include the 13
years which Socrates reckons in the lifetime of Constantine, we only
reach 37. He was born on Aug. 6, 317, and was therefore a little over
44 at his death.
“Constantius was
essentially a little man, in whom his father’s vices took a
meaner form.” “The peculiar repulsiveness of Constantius is
not due to any flagrant personal vice, but to the combination of
cold-blooded treachery with the utter want of any inner nobleness of
character. Yet he was a pious emperor, too, in his way. He loved the
ecclesiastical game, and was easily won over to the Eusebian
side.”
Gwatkin. “The
Arian Controversy.” p. 63. | Nor had he the
helper whom his Father had left him; for he had not kept intact the inheritance of
his Father’s piety, and so bitterly bewailed his change of
faith.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|