Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| A criticism on Rufinus' Apology to Anastasius. His excuses for not coming to Rome are absurd. His parents are dead and the journey is easy. No one ever heard before of his being imprisoned or exiled for the faith. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
2. He professes in the first place to be replying to
insinuations made at Rome against his orthodoxy, he being a man most
fully approved in respect both of divine faith and of charity. He says
that he would have wished to come himself, were it not that he had
lately returned, after thirty years’ absence, to his parents, and
that it would have seemed harsh and inhuman to leave them after having
been so long in coming to them; and also if he had not become somewhat
less robust through his long and toilsome journey, and too infirm to
begin his labours again. As he had not been able to come himself, he
had sent his apology as a kind of literary cudgel which the bishop
might hold in his hand and drive away the dogs who were raging against
him. If he is a man approved for his divine faith and charity by all,
and especially by the Bishop to whom he writes; how is it that at Rome
he is assailed and reviled, and that the reports of the attacks upon
his reputation grow thicker. Further, what sort of humility is this,
that a man speaks of himself as approved for his divine faith and
charity? The Apostles prayed,3082
“Lord increase our faith,” and received for answer: “If ye
had faith as a grain of mustard seed;” and even to Peter it is
said:3083 “O thou of little faith,
wherefore didst thou doubt?” Why should I speak of charity, which
is greater than either faith or hope, and which Paul says he hopes for
rather than assumes: without which even the blood shed in martyrdom and
the body given up to the flames has no reward to crown it. Yet both of
these our friend claims as his own: in such a way, however, that there
still remain creatures who bark against him, and who will go on barking
unless the illustrious Pontiff drives them away with his stick. But how
absurd is this plea which he puts forward, of having returned to his
parents after thirty years. Why, he has got neither father nor mother!
He left them alive when he was a young man, and, now that he is old, he
pines for them when they are dead. But perhaps, he means by
“parents,” what is meant in the talk of the soldiers and
the common people, his kinsfolk and relations; well, he says he does
not wish to be thought so harsh and inhuman as to desert them; and
therefore he leaves his home3084
3084 This old home was at Concordia. Jer. Ep. V, 2; comp. with title of
Ep. X. | and goes to
live at Aquileia. That most approved faith of his is in great peril at
Rome, and yet he lies on his back, being a bit tired after thirty
years, and cannot make that very easy journey in a carriage along that
Flaminian Way. He puts forward his lassitude after his long journey, as
if he had done nothing but move about for thirty years, or as if, after
resting at Aquileia for two years, he was still worn out with the
labour of his past travels.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|