Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter VII PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
VII.
Yet let
no one ask, “How was it that, if God foresaw the misfortune that
would happen to man from want of thought, He came to create him, since
it was, perhaps, more to his advantage not to have been born than to be
in the midst of such evils?” This is what they who have been
carried away by the false teaching of the Manichees put forward for the
establishment of their error, as thus able to show that the Creator of
human nature is evil. For if God is not ignorant of anything that is,
and yet man is in the midst of evil, the argument for the goodness of
God could not be upheld; that is, if He brought forth into life the man
who was to be in this evil. For if the operating force which is in
accordance with the good is entirely that of a nature which is
good, then this painful and perishing life, they say, can never be
referred to the workmanship of the good, but it is necessary to suppose
for such a life as this another author, from whom our nature derives
its tendency to misery. Now all these and the like assertions seem to
those who are thoroughly imbued with the heretical fraud, as with some
deeply ingrained stain, to have a certain force from their superficial
plausibility. But they who have a more thorough insight into the truth
clearly perceive that what they say is unsound, and admits of speedy
demonstration of its fallacy. In my opinion, too, it is well to put
forward the Apostle as pleading with us on these points for their
condemnation. In his address to the Corinthians he makes a distinction
between the carnal and spiritual dispositions of souls; showing, I
think, by what he says that it is wrong to judge of what is morally
excellent, or, on the other hand, of what is evil, by the standard of
the senses; but that, by withdrawing the mind from bodily phenomena, we
must decide by itself and from itself the true nature of moral
excellence and of its opposite. “The spiritual man,” he
says, “judgeth all things1961 .” This,
I think, must have been the reason of the invention of these deceptive
doctrines on the part of those who propound them, viz. that when they
define the good they have an eye only to the sweetness of the
body’s enjoyment, and so, because from its composite nature and
constant tendency to dissolution that body is unavoidably subject to
suffering and sicknesses, and because upon such conditions of suffering
there follows a sort of sense of pain, they decree that the formation
of man is the work of an evil deity. Since, if their thoughts had taken
a loftier view, and, withdrawing their minds from this disposition to
regard the gratifications of the senses, they had looked at the nature
of existing things dispassionately, they would have understood that
there is no evil other than wickedness. Now all wickedness has its form
and character in the deprivation of the good; it exists not by itself,
and cannot be contemplated as a subsistence. For no evil of any kind
lies outside and independent of the will; but it is the non-existence
of the good that is so denominated. Now that which is not has no
substantial existence, and the Maker of that which has no substantial
existence is not the Maker of things that have substantial existence.
Therefore the God of things that are is external to the causation of
things that are evil, since He is not the Maker of things that are
non-existent. He Who formed the sight did not make blindness. He Who
manifested virtue manifested not the deprivation thereof. He Who has
proposed as the prize in the contest of a free will the guerdon of all
good to those who are living virtuously, never, to please Himself,
subjected mankind to the yoke of a strong compulsion, as if he would
drag it unwilling, as it were his lifeless tool, towards the right. But
if, when the light shines very brightly in a clear sky, a man of his
own accord shuts his eyelids to shade his sight, the sun is clear of
blame on the part of him who sees not.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|