CHAPTER - Ft1 Cf. Mohler, Athanasius, Bd. ii. S. 280; and Dorner, Lehre von der Person Christi, 2 Auff. Bd. i. S. 1072. That fu>iv is frequently employed in the fourth century, e.g. by Apollinaris, in the sense of Person, is maintained by Munscher, Lehrb. d. Dogmeng . i. S. 278.

Ft2 Munseher, Lehrb. i. S. 274, 8, and 276, 9, and 298. [Cf. Hagenbach, § 99, Eng. Tr. i. pp. 386-389.] Ft3 Of his writings only fragments remain, particularly in the Acts of the fifth Oecumenical Synod, Collat. iv. et v.; in Hardouin, Coll. Concil. t. iii. p. 72 sqq., 92 sqq.; in Mansi, Coll. Concil t. ix. p. 203 sqq.; also in Galland. Bibl. Patrum, t. xii. p. 690; and Munteri, Fragm. P.P. Graec., Hafniae 1788. Cf. Fritsche, De Theodori Mopsuest. vita et Scriptis, Halae 1887. Theodore’s Commentary on the Twelve Prophets was unknown until it was discovered by Angelo Mai, and published in his Nova Collectio Script. vet. t. vi. pp. 1-298.

Ft4 Compare Hardouin and Mansi, II. cc. §§ 59, 60, 2, 3, 10, 27; and the account of the teaching of Theodore of Mopsuestia, by Gengler, in the Tubing. theol. Quartalschrift, 1835, Heft 2, S. 226 f., and Dorner, l.c.

Bd. ii. S. 33 ff.

Ft5 Dorner, 1.c. S. 52, and § 19 in Hardouin and Mansi, ll. cc Ft6 Hardouin and Mansi, ll. cc. § 29; Dorner, 1. c. p. 52.

Ft7 [It is used of dancers joining hand in hand.] Ft8 Origen expressed himself with remarkable beauty in his Commentary on the Epistle to the.Romans on the Communicatio idiomatum: Per indissolubilem unitatem Verbi et carnis, omnia quae carnis sunt, adscribuntur et Verbo, et quae Verbi sunt, praedicantur de carne.

Ft9 Compare above, vol. i. p. 252. Also Munscher, Lehrb. i. S. 286; Socrates, vii. 82.

Ft10 Gregor. Nyss. Contra Eunomium, i. iv. t. ii. p. 161, ed. Paris, 1615; Munscher, Lehrb. der Dogmeng. i. 276.

Ft11 Epiph. Ancorat. c. 36 and 95, t. ii. pp. 42 and 96, ed. Patav. Similarly Hoeres. 69, n. 24 and 42; and Hoeres. 72, n. 23.

Ft12 Hardouin and Mansi, ll. cc.§ i.; Dorner, l.c.S. 50.

Ft13 It is not absolutely certain that Theodore of Mopsuestia was the teacher of Nestorius, but it is highly probable, as Petavius (Dogm. Theolog. t. iv. lib. i. c. 7) and Walch (Ketzerhist. Thl. v. S. 315 ff.) have shown.

Ft14 Socrat. Hist . Eccl. lib. vii. c. 29; Theodoret, Hoeret. Fabul. lib. iv. c. 12; Evagrius, Hist . Eccl. i. 7; Gennad. De Scrip. eccl. 53; Vincent.

Lirin. c. 16.

Ft15 Socrat. Hist. Eccl. vii. 29.

Ft16 Marius Mercator, ed Garnier, republ, by Migne, Paris, 1846, pp. 61, 174, 179, 181, 185, 187, 203 (note).

Ft17 In his Works, ed. Garnier-Migne, p. 63 sqq.

Ft18 This is dear from the title of the memorial.

Ft19 In Marius Merc. l.c. p. 182.

Ft20 Ibid. 1.c. p. 176.

Ft21 In Mansi, t. v. p. 573; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1331.

Ft22 According to Cyril of Alexandria (Ep. vi. p. 30, Ep. ix. p. 37, Opp. t. v. ed. Aubert.; and in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1014), the first attack on qeoto>cov was made by Bishop Dorotheus (apparently of Marcianople), a friend of Nestorius.

Ft23 Several Protestants lay stress upon the fact that Luther, in his time, had remarked upon the injustice of the last reproach. Quite true; but more than a thousand years before, Socrates (vii. 32), in the very place where he mentions the accusation, asserts its groundlessness.

Ft24 In Marius Mercat. ed. Garnier-Migue, p. 757 sqq.

Ft25 Marius Mere. 1.c. 763 sqq.

Ft26 Marius Mere. 1.c. p. 770; Cyrill. Opp. t. iv. p. 20; Tillemont, t. xiv. p. 318.

Ft27 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1336; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1102.

Ft28 His discourse is given in a Latin translation by Marius Mercator, l.c. p. sqq.; in Greek by Mansi, t. iv. p. 578 sqq. Hardouin has not given it. On Proclus, of. Assemani, Biblioth. jur. orient, t. iii. p. 42 sqq.

Ft29 In Marius Mercator, l.c. p. 782.

Ft30 Ibid. p. 785.

Ft311bid. p. 787.

Ft32 In Marius Merc. 1.c. pp. 789-801.

Ft33 Cyrill. Alex. Opp. t. v. p. ii. p. 222.

Ft34 Opp. 1.c. Epist. i. pp. 1-19; also in Mansi, t. iv. pp. 587-618. It is not given by Hardouin.

Ft35 Ibid. c. 12, p. 599; in Mansi, l.c.

Ft36 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 883 sq.; and in the Works of Cyril, l.c. Epist. ii. p. sq.It is wanting in Hardouin.

Ft37 Cyrill. Opp. 1.c. Ep. iii. p. 21; and in Mansi, 1.c. p. 886.

Ft38 Given in Latin by Marius Merc. I.c . p. 174; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1307; Mansi, l.c. p. 1021. In Germany by Fuchs, Biblioth. der Kitchenvers.

Bd. iii. S. 503.

Ft39 In Marius Merc. l .c . p. 178; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1809; Mansi, 1.c. p. 1023; in German by Fuchs, l.c . S. 507.

Ft40 Cyrilli Opp. l.c. Epist . iv. p. 22; in Mansi, I.c. p. 887 sqq., and t. iv. p. 659; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1273 and t. ii. p. 115; in German by Fuchs, l.c.

S. 479 ff.

Ft41 Cyrilli Opp. 1.c. Epist. v. p. 25. In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1277, and Mansi, t. iv. p. 891 sqq. In German by Fuchs, l.c. S. 489.

Ft42 These two letters are preserved in Cyrilli Opp. l.c., and in Mansi, t. iv. pp. 618-679, 679-803, and 803-883. They are wanting in Hardouin.

Ft43 In Mansi, t. v. p. 517.

Ft44 In Mansi, t. v. p. 518.

Ft45 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1110; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1341.

Ft46 Best in the Latin translation in Marius Merc. l.c. p. 808 sqq., and Mansi, t. v. p. 722; less accurate in Greek, in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1003 sqq.

In German in Fuchs, I.c. S. 495.

Ft47 This is clear from the letter of Cyril to Acacius of Berrhoea, in Mansi, t. v. p. 517.

Ft48 Cf. the third letter of Nestorius to Pope Coelestine, in Mansi, t. v. See note in § 130.

Ft49 Cf. the letter of the Pope to Nestorius, etc. p. 25.

Ft50 Cyrilli Opp. 1.c. Epist. ix. p. 36. In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1011 sqq. In German by Fuchs, 1.c. S. 508 ff. Hardouin has not given this document.

Ft51 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1319; Mansi, t. iv. p. 547. In German, by Fuchs, l.c.

S. 516.

Ft52 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1130; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1355.

Ft53 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 550 (wanting in Hardouin).

Ft54 In Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1017, 1025, 1035, and 1047; Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1299, 1311, 1321, 1323. Cf. Garnier’s treatise, De Synodis habitis in cause, Nestoriana, in his edition of the works of Marius Mercator (ed.

Migne, p. 1167 sqq.). Garnier here, as frequently, makes two synods out of one.

Ft55 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1025; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1299. In German by Fachs, 1.c.

S. 534.

Ft56 Mansi, l.c . p. 1035; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1311. German by Fucks, 1.c. S. 541.

Ft57 In Mansi, 1.c. p. 1047. Hardouin, t. i. p. 1323. German by Fuchs, l.c. S. 547.

Ft58 In Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1049 and 1055.

Ft59 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1017; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1321. In German by Fuchs, 1. c. S. 528.

Ft60 In Mansi, t. v. p. 725. In the Lat`in translation of Marins Mercator. In German by Fuchs, l.c. S. 526 (wanting in Hardouin).

Ft61 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1061; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1327. German by Fuchs, l.c.S. 554.

Ft62 Mansi, t. v. p. 752; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1331. German by Fuchs, l.c. S. 561.

Ft63 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1067; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1283. Merely in Latin, Mansi, v. p. 502 sqq. German, Fuchs, l.c. Bd. in. S. 564 ff.

Ft64 Cf. on this point, above, p. 3, and below, p. 31 f.

Ft65 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1082; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1291; Fuchs, l.c. S. 578 f.

Ft66 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1093; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1295.

Ft67 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1097; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1297.

Ft68 We learn this from the account which these ambassadors subsequently gave at the Synod of Ephesus. Cf. also Baronius, ad ann. 430, n. and 59.

Ft69 They are found best in Marius Mercator, ed. Migne, p. 909, together with the criticisms of Marius Mercator. Also in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1099; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1298. German, Fuchs, 1. c. S. 588.

Ft70 This has no reference to Cyril; but is a hyper-Nestorianism, which Nestorius here rejects.

Ft71 This was asserted by some Apollinarists; and Nestorius accused S. Cyril of Apollinarianism.

Ft72 [This is the reference in the original; but the Editor is unable to say to what it refers.] Ft73 On this point Marius Mercator ,already remarked with justice that no Catholic had ever asserted anything of the kind.

Ft74 The part enclosed in brackets is certainly a spurious addition, and is wanting in many MSS. Cf. Marius Mercator, ed. Migne, p. 919.

Ft75 In Mansi, t. v. p. 756; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1347. German by Fuchs, l.c. S. 595 ff.

Ft76 Cyrilli Apologetlcus adv. Orientales, Opp. t. vi. p. 159 sqq.

Ft77 Theodoret, Reprehensio xii. Anathematismatorum Cyrilli, Opp. edit.

Schulze, t. v. pp. 1-68; Theodoreti Epist. ad Joann. Antioch. ibid. t. iv. p. 1288; and in Cyrilli Opp. ed. Aubert, t. vi. p. 203 sqq.

Ft78 Kirchengesch. Bd. 18, S. Ft79 Biblioth. d. Kirchenvers. Bd. in. S. 565, Anm. 627, and S. 587, Anm. 654.

CHAPTER - Ft80 In the Tubing. theol. Quartalschrift, 1835, Heft 2, S. 216.

Ft81 Evagrius, Hist. Eccl. i. 7.

Ft82 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1102; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1335. German in Fuchs, Bibl. der Kirchenvers. Bd. in. S. 592.

Ft83 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1111; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1343. German in Fuchs, l.c.

Bd. ii. S. 603.

Ft84 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1109; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1342. German in Fuchs, l.c. S. 599 ff.

Ft85 Cf. Liberati Breviar. causae Nestorianorum et Eutych. c. 5, and the letter of Capreolus, Archbishop of Carthage, to the Synod of Ephesus, in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1207; in Hardouin, t. i. p. 1419.

Ft86 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1292; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1474.

Ft87 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1291; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1478.

Ft88 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1347; Mansi, t. iv. p. 556.

Ft89 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1467; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1283 sqq.

Ft90 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1346; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1118. German in Fuchs, l.c. S. 605.

Ft91 Hardouin, t. i. p. 1435; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1230.

Ft92 Socrates, 7 34. Ft93 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1115 sqq.

Ft94 Hardouin, t. i. p. 1541; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1381.

Ft95 Socrates, 1. c.; Schrockh, in his Kirchengesch. (Bd. 18, S. 235), has perverted and misunderstood this and many other passages in the original authorities in a partial manner, to the disadvantage of Cyril.

Ft96 Evagrius, Hist. Eccl. i. c. 3.

Ft97 This date is evident from the fact that the Synod says that they had already waited for John of Antioch sixteen days. And Cyril remarks that they had waited for sixteen days after receiving intelligence of the approach of John. Cf. Mansi, t. iv. p. 1230 with 1331, and Hardouin, t. i. p, 1435 with 1506.

Ft98 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1347; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1121.

Ft99 Cyril says they waited sixteen days after receiving this message, in Hardouin, t. i. p. 1435; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1230.

Ft100 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1330 sq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1506. These two Alexanders afterwards signed, with Nestorius, the protest against the first session of Ephesus; see below, p. 54.

Ft101 Cf. Cyril’s Letters in Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1242 and 1230.

Ft102 Cf. Acta Synodi Ephes. Actio i., Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1358 sqq. Cf. pp. 1435 and 1506; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1131 sqq. Cf. p. 1230 sq. and p. 1131.

In German by Fuchs, Bibl. d. Kirchenv. Bd. iv. S. 50 ff.

Ft103 Hardouin, t. i. p. 1350;. Mansi, t. v. p. 765.

Ft104 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1351; Mansi, t. v. p. 770.

Ft105 That Cyril presided as Pope’s vicar is asserted also by Mennas of Constantinople and other Greek bishops in their letter to Pope Vigilius, in Mansi, t. ix. p. 62; Hardouin, t. iii. p. 10.

Ft106 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1123 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1354. More exactly, there were 159 bishops and one deacon, Bessula of Carthage, as representative of his bishop.

Ft107 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1211 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1423.

Ft108 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1211 sqq., cf. with t. v. p. 766; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1423, cf. with p. 1350.

Ft109 Cf. Mansi, t. iv. p. 1127 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1355 sqq.

Ft110 There is no reference in the Acts to what was said or transacted in the Synod in the intermediate times during which the envoys came back from Nestorius.

Ft111 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1123 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1354 sqq.

Ft112 In Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1139-1.170; Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1363-1387.

Ft113 Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1170-1178; Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1387-1395.

Ft114 This is the synodal letter to which the twelve anathematisms were appended. We were formerly of opinion that these anthematisms were read at Ephesus, but not expressly confirmed, as there is hardly anything on the subject in the Acts. But in the fifth Oecumenical Council (Collatio vi.) it is said “Chalcedonensis saneta Synodus Cyrillure sanetae memoriae doctorem sibi adscribit et suscipit synodicas ejus epistolas, quarum uni 12 capitula supposita sunt” (Mansi, t. ix. p. 341; Hardouin, t. in. p. 167). If, however, the anathematisms of Cyril were expressly confirmed at Chalcedon, there was even more reason for doing so at Ephesus. And Ibas, in his well-known letter to Maris, says expressly that the Synod of Ephesus confirmed the anathematisms of Cyril, and the same was asserted even by the bishops of Antioch at Ephesus in a letter to the Emperor, of which mention will hereafter be made in sec. 145 (Hardouin, t. ii. p. 530).

Ft115 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1182; Hardouin, t. i, p. 1398; Fuchs, 1. c. S. 59.

Ft116 All these passages are given by Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1183-1195, and by Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1399-1410. German by Fuchs, 1. c. S. 61 ff.

Ft117 In Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1198-1207; Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1410-1419. German in Fuchs, 1. c. S. 69 ff.

Ft118 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1207 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1419 sqq.; Fuchs, I.e . S. 76.

Ft119 Mansi t. vi. p. 1211; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1431.

Ft120 In Mansi, t. vi. p. 1226; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1431.

Ft121 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1242 sq.

Ft122 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1227; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1434; Fuchs, 1. c. S. 79.

Ft123 In Mansi, t. iv. pp. 1227 and 1242; Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1434 and 1443.

Ft124 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1230 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1434. Such a complete report, provided with the Acts of the Synod, certainly needed longer time to prepare, for during the session the notaries made only short remarks, notes (hence their name), respecting what was spoken; and it was only afterwards that the matter was regularly committed to paper, and the Acts of the Synod prepared. Cf. Tillemont, t. i.4 p. 405.

Ft125 Cf. his own relation in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1263; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1451.

Ft126 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1447; Mansi, t. v. p. 772.

Ft127 [See s.v. Martyrium in Smith and Cheetham’s Dictionary of Antiquities .] Ft128 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1234; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1438. in the Latin translation of this document (in the Synodicon Irenaei, in Mansi, t. v. p. 766) six other bishops are found subscribing (e.g. Julian of Sardica), and it is added at the end “Et omnes alii, qui erant pariter, subseripserunt similiter.”

Ft129 Their homilies are given by Mansi, t. iv. p. 1246 sqq., t. v. p. 218 sqq., Hardouin, t. i. pp. 1443 and 1663, 1666. One of Cyril’s two sermons was delivered when seven additional bishops of the synodal party gave in their adhesion, and were present at divine service in the Church of Maria Deipara. Others are described as having been delivered “on the day of S. John the Evangelist,” but we should probably read “at the Church of S. John the Evangelist” instead. Cf. Tillemont, t. xiv. p. sq.

Ft130 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1235 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1439 sqq. German in Fuchs, l.c . Bd. iv. S. 80 ff.

Ft131 This date is clear from the Acts of the Conciliabulum which was held by John of Antioch. See the following pages. The only question is, whether the 22d of June should be reckoned among the five days of which the Conciliabulum speaks or not. In the one case, John would have arrived on the 26th (Friday); in the other, not until Saturday the 27th. Cf. Tillemont, Memoires, t. xiv. note 45, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft132 In his letter in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1438; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1595.

Ft133 This is confirmed by the remarks of Tillemont, t. xiv. note 46, Sur St.

Cyrille.

Ft134 Cf. Epistola Memnonis, ll. cc.

Ft135 Epist. Synodi in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1334; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1507.

Ft136 The Conciliabulum said nothing respecting Nestorius. Cyril and his friends therefore accused the Antiochenes of being adherents of Nestorius. They certainly were so negatively, since they did not accept the sentence against Nestorius put forth by the Ephesine Synod. But they were not so positively, since they did not sanction the doctrine of Nestorius, and afterwards they agreed to his deposition. Cf. Tillemont, Memoires, t. xiv. p. 415 sq.

Ft137 The Acts are given in Mansi, t. iv. 10. 1259 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. 10. 1447 sq. German (abridged) by Fuchs, 1.c. Bd. iv. S. 92 ff.

Ft138 In Mansi, t. iv. P. 1271-1280; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1458 sqq.

Ft139 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1270; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1458.

Ft140 If John arrived at Ephesus on Friday the 26th of June, then this Saturday was the next day. If, however, he arrived on the 27th, then that which is here related took place on the evening of the day on which he arrived.

Ft141 Mansi, t. v. p. 774 sq.

Ft142 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1439; Hardonin, t. i. p. 1595.

Ft143 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1431; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1590.

Ft144 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1378 sq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1538 sq.

Ft145 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1422; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1582.

Ft146 Tillemont, Memoires, t. i.4 note 47, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft147 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1379 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1539 sqq.

Ft148 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1439; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1595.

Ft149 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1356 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1546 sq.

Ft150 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1422 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1582 sqq. German by Fuchs, 1.c. Bd. 4 S. 107.

Ft151 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1279 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1465 sqq.

Ft152 The Katholik (1872, S. 29) thinks that this examination of the doctrine of Nestorius was not intended to enlighten the Fathers as to its heretical character, as they had before declared Nestorius to be heretical, but that it was intended as an act of approval. But, in fact, the reading of the passages brought forward was intended to prove that Nestorius was heretical, and it was only after the reading of some of the passages that many Fathers exclaimed, “Anathema.” See p. 47.

Ft153 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1287 sq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1471.

Ft154 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1290; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1474.

Ft155 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1299; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1482.

Ft156 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1302; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1482.

Ft157 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1303; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1483.

Ft158 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1306 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1486 sqq.

Ft159 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1310-1315; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1487 sq.

Ft160 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1318-1326; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1493-1500. German in Fuchs, l.c. S. 135 ff.

Ft161 In the imperial edict of convocation it was said that whoever should not be at Ephesus by Pentecost, should be in a high degree responsible before God and the Emperors. See above, p. 40.

Ft162 In the letter to the Pope, to be noticed presently, the Synod adds, that “many of these so-called bishops had no churches, others had been expelled from Thessaly” (perhaps Italy).

Ft163 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1326 sq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1502 sqq.

Ft164 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1330-1338; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1503-1510. The words relating to the Pelagians are the following: jjAnagnwsqe>ntwn de< ejn th~| aJgi>a| suno>dw| tw~n uJpomnha>twn tw~n pepragme>nwn ejpi> th~| caqaire>sei tw~n ajnosi>wn Pelagiavw~n kai< Kelestianw~n, Kelesti>ou, Pelagi>ou, jIoulavi>ou, Persidi>ou, Flw>rou, Marcelli>nou, jOrenti>ou, kai< ta< aujta< tou>toiv fronou>ntwn, ejdikaiw>samen kai< hJmei~~v ijscura< kai< be>baia me>nein ta< ejp j aujtoi~v wJrisme>na para< th~v sh~v Qeosebei>av kai< su>myhfoi pa>ntev ejsme>n, kaqh|rhme>nouv e]contev aujtou>uv .

Ft165 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1338 sqq.

Ft166 The Acts of this session are no longer preserved entire in Greek (Mansi, t. iv. p. 1342 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1520 sqq.); but we possess several Latin translations and extracts in Mansi, t. v. p. 602 sqq., and the still more complete Latin translation of Marius Mercator, ibid. p. 686 sqq.

Ft167 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1347; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1515.

Ft168 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1347 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1515 sqq. German in Fuchs, l.c. S. 143 ff. Partly in Tubing. theol. Quartalschr. 1835, S. ff.

Ft169 Cf. Walch, Ketzergesch. Bd. 5 S. 354.

Ft170 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1358; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1523.

Ft171 In his edition of the works of Marius Mercator, in the preface to Pars ii. p. 729, edit. Migne.

Ft172 Dupin, Nouvelle Biblioth. t. iv. p. 300; Tillemont, Memoires, t. xiv. p. 444, edit. Venise; Fleury, Hist. Eccl. Liv. 25 § 57; Remi Ceillier, Histoire des Auteurs Sacres, t. xiii. p. 746; Walch, Ketzergesch. Bd. S. 511 f.

Ft173 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1465; Hardouin, t. i. p. 167.

Ft174 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1468; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1620.

Ft175 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1466-1470; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1617-1620; Fuchs, l.c . S. 149-153. Cf., on the Cypriote controversy, also Maassen, Der Primat desBischofs you Romans S. 50 ff.

Ft176 This is the comment of the old scholiast Zonaras on this passage. See Bevereg. Synodicon, t. i. p. 102.

Ft177 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1471 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1622 sqq.; Fuchs, S. ff. Beveridge gives a commentary on some of the Ephesine canons, Synodicon, t. ii. Appendix, p. 103 sqq.

Ft178 Mansi, Hardouin, and Fuchs, ll. cc.

Ft179 In the superscription of the synodal letter he is called metropolitan; but the two metropolitan sees of Pamphylia, Perga and Side, were then occupied by Berinian and Amphilochius (eft the signatures of the bishops present at Ephesus, in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1214 and 1226; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1423 and 1481); on the other hand, we find among the Fathers of the Ephesine Synod a Theodore of Attalia, and Tillemont has suggested (note 55, , Sur St. Cyrille) that this was the successor of Eustathius.

Ft180 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1475; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1626. Cf. Hergenrother, Photius, etc., Bd. ii. S. 339.

Ft181 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1477; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1627. Cf. Tillemont, t. xiv. note 56, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft182 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1478; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1628.

Ft183 From a letter of the Antiochene deputies (see § 148) we see that Juvenal also laid claim to Phoenicia and Arabia.

Ft184 Cf. on this subject our commentary on the seventh Nicene canon, in vol. i. p. 404 ff., and what was said there (p. 393) on the extent of the Patriarchate of Antioch.

Ft185 That the last point was contained in this letter, is clear from the Apologia Dalmatic. (tou~to oujn ejge>neto, i[na pemfqh~|, kai< e]lqwsin oiJ ejrco>mevoi . . . oiJ aJgiw>tatoi ejpi>skopoi, oiJ ejrco>menoi para< th~v aJgi>av suno>dou ), Mansi, t. iv. p. 1429; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1588 sq.

Ft186 Before this, as he indicates himself (Mansi, Hardouin, ll. cc.), he had advised the Emperor, when the latter visited him, how he should write to Ephesus. The Emperor appeared at first disposed to agree with his advice, but was turned from it by means of an intrigue, and then wrote what Palladius arranged (see above, p. 59) .

Ft187 The documents referring to these events are in Mansi, t. iv. p. and 1430; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1586 sqq. Some historians refer this occurrence to a somewhat later period, when Cyril and Memnon were already arrested, and the need of the Synod had become greater. But the documents just referred to give not the slightest hint that the arrest had as yet taken place, and that which Dalmatius requested, namely, the admission of envoys from the Synod, followed about the same time, when Irenaeus went to Constantinople, and a considerable time before the arrival of Count John, and before the arrest of Cyril and Memnon.

Cf. Walch, Ketzergesch. 58. 522.

Ft188 Their names are, indeed, never definitely mentioned, but they may be inferred from the fact that these two bishops, who were among those who previously subscribed at Ephesus, are from this time mentioned as being present at Constantinople.

Ft189 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1258; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1447. Frequently, but erroneously, the letter, which we still possess, from Dalmatius to the Synod (Mansi, t. iv. p. 1258; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1446), is referred to this time. It is evidently later, and mentions earlier services which Dalmatius rendered to the Council.

Ft190 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1374; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1585.

Ft191 Thus each side complained of the misdeeds of the other. Both might have occasion for this. The possessors of power on the side of the Schismatics (Candidian, etc.) oppressed the Synod; the people of Ephesus, on the other hand, threatened and insulted the Schismatics.

Ft192 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1390; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1547.

Ft193 In our copies the letter of the Antiochenes no longer has the Nicene Creed. Garnier and others believed, therefore, that the document with the superscription De Schismaticis, which is printed in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1375, and in Hardouin, t. i. p. 1585, and contains the Nicene Creed, was originally a portion of the letter of the Antiochenes in question.

This is not so. That document is evidently later, for there is a reference in it to the third imperial letter, which Count John conveyed.

Ft194 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1371 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1534 sqq.

Ft195 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1383 and 1386; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1543. The last of these two letters to the Praepositus and the Scholasticus seems,, besides, to have been composed somewhat later, after the arrival of Count John; for there is a reference there, as in the note above, to three letters of the Emperor.

Ft196 In Theodoreti Opp. ed. Schnlze, t. iv. p. 1335, and more complete, t. v. p. 649. See also the remarks of Garnier, \bid. p. 368. Further, in Mansi, t. v. p. 787, and t. 9 p. 293, and Hardouin, t. in. p. 136, under the Acts of the fifth Oecumenical Council, cellat, v.

Ft197 Nestorius wrote to him somewhat later, in order to gain his favor again, and explained in what sense he consented to call Mary God- bearer. At the same time he misrepresented the doctrine of Cyril, as if the latter ascribed a beginning in time and death to the divine nature of Christ, Mansi, t. v. p. 777; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1552.

Ft198 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1391 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1547 sqq.

Ft199 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1395; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1554.

Ft200 Isidor. Pelus. lib. 1 epist. iii.10, 323, 370; Baron. ad ann. 431, n. 85; Mansi, t. v. p. 758, where thirteen Latin letters of lsidore are printed.

Ft201 Irenaeus, as we have seen, had arrived at Constantinople on the 20th of July. The conferences between him and his opponents, and- before the Emperor, may have Lasted until towards the end of the month of July. The consequence of them was the despatch of Count John; and since the latter, as he himself remarks, made uncommon haste, but was yet detained through various hindrances (Mansi, t. iv. p. 1397; Hardonin, t. i. p. 1555), his arrival in Ephesus may have taken place at the beginning of August.

Ft202 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1367 sqq.

Ft203 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1397 sq., and with a somewhat different text in t. v. p. 779; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1555.

Ft204 In Mansi, t. v. p. 784 and 786; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1559 and 1560.

Ft205 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1434; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1591.

Ft206 Tillemont, Memoires, t. xiv. note 60, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft207 Walch thinks (Ketzergesch. v. 518) that John was accused of having sent false reports from Ephesus to the Emperor. But this is not suggested here. Cyril has here rather in view the imperial Sacra brought by John, and writes (politely) on account of John, what he has to find fault with in it.

Ft208 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1435; Hardouin , t. i. p. 1593. The letter of Memnon to the clergy of Constantinople (Mansi, 1. c. p. 1438; and Hardouin, 1.c. p. 1595) is earlier, and was composed before the arrival of Count John.

Ft209 The bishops referred to are not mentioned by name here, as they are later (see p. 90 f.), perhaps because their names were not yet known at Ephesus.

Ft210 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1443 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1599 sqq.

Ft211 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1450; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1603.

Ft212 We assume that this letter of the Synod to the bishops was the second which they sent to them, and so later than that mentioned p. 89, although the reverse is possible.

Ft213 I think the words of the text must be understood to mean that it was at this time that the second account was addressed to the Emperor, and that it was sent on this occasion. Accordingly I assign a different chronological position to this second account from that which is commonly given, e.g. by Walch, Ketzergesch. Bd. v. S. 519.

Ft214 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1450 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1606.

Ft215 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1441; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1597.

Ft216 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1447; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1601.

Ft217 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1453; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1607.

Ft218 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1258; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1446. It is certainly erroneous to suppose that Dalmatius had not sooner sided with the Synod; and that now he went for the first time with his monks in front of the imperial palace. He speaks himself, in the letter mentioned above, of earlier services.

Ft219 In Mansi, t. iv p. 1463; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1614.

Ft220 In Mansi, t. v. p. 1 sqq., and Cyrilli Opp. ed. Aubert, t. vi. p. 145 sqq.

Ft221 Cf. below, sec. 155, where the same creed appears again, and where the Greek text is also given.

Ft222 In Mansi, t. v. p. 781 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1557.

Ft223 In Mansi, t. v. p. 874.

Ft224 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1375; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1535.

Ft225 In Mansi, t. v. p. 784; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1559.

Ft226 Mansi, t. v. t3. 785; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1560.

Ft227 This is the meaning of the Greek text crhsta< ta< para< tou~ qesfilesta>tou basile>wv hJmi~n ajgge>lletai , where hJmi~n is to be connected with ajgge>lletai (it is told us). The Latin translation has altered the sense Imperator meliora de uobis cogitate dicitur. Mansi, t. iv. p. 1450; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1603.

Ft228 Baron. ad ann. 431, n. 137 sqq.; Tillemont, Memoires, t. xiv. note 61, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft229 It is remarkable that in the synodal documents relating to this subject (in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1458; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1610) the Roman priest Philip is named primo loco, before the other papal legate Arcadins, although he was a bishop, and before Juvenal, etc. Peter de Marca (De concordia, etc., lib. 5 e. 4, § 8) would explain this as merely an error of the transcriber; but Tillemont long ago saw (Mem. t. i.4 p. 471) the, weakness of this argument, without, however, supplanting it by another. It may suffice to remember that on several former occasions, as we saw above (p. 64), Philip stood primo loco among the papal legates. In the next document, however, he appears again ultimo loco.

Ft230 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1399; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1562.

Ft231 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1457 sqq.; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1609 sqq.

Ft232 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1462, t. v. p. 651; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1611.

Ft233 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1399, t. v. p. 791; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1562.

Ft234 The Syrian month Gorpiaeus is exactly the same as the Roman month September. Cf. Ideler, Lehrbuch der Chronol. 1831, S. 180f. Petavius maintained the same. Usher, on the contrary, and others, think that Gorpiaeus began with the 25th of August, and that the 11th Gorp. is therefore = September 4. Cf. Tillemont, l.c. note 63, Sur St. Cyrille.

Ft235 Hardouin, t. i. p. 1568; Mansi, t. iv. p. 1406; still better, t. v. p. 794, with the notes of Baluzius ibid.

Ft236 He had asked for this permission when the Emperor summoned the deputies and he now regarded his cause as lost. Evagrius, i. 7.

Ft237 Mansi, t. v. p. 792; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1631.

Ft238 Epistola Nestorii ad eundem Praefectum praetorium Antiochenum (probably Antiochium), in Mansi, t. v. p. 793; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1631.

Ft239 We no longer possess the original Greek text of this letter, but two Latin translations, in no considerable degree divergent from each other, in Mansi, t. iv. p. 1411, and t. v. p. 795. The former is also in Hardouin, t. i. p. 1572.

Ft240 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1577, and Mansi, t. iv. p. 1417; and in the Synodicon, ibid. t. v. p. 795-797.

Ft241 These signatures are given in only one of the two translations in Mansi, t. v. p. 797, and Hardouin, t. i. p. 1578.

Ft242 In Hardouin, t. i. p. 1579, and Mansi, t. iv. p. 1419; and in the Synodicon, ibid. t. v. p. 797.

Ft243 In Schulze’s edition of the works of Theodoret, t. v. p. 104 f.; and in Hardouin, t. in. p. 136; and Mansi, t. 9 p. 292 sq. Among the Acts of the fifth Oecumenical Synod, Collat. v.

Ft244 Julian signed the letter to the deputies, mentioned at p. 101 f. (Mansi, t. v. p. 797; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1578); and also, at the beginning of the Ephesine Synod, the protest against their opening before the arrival of John of Antioch. See above, p. 45.

Ft245 In opposition to this, cf. the remark of Baluzius in Mansi, t. v. p. 807, note a. He suggests that Bishop Martin of Milan could as yet have known nothing of a division in the Synod of Ephesus, but might have written to the Synod generally, and his letter, during the oppression of the orthodox, might have come into the hands of the Antiochenes.

Apart from this, it is stated generally, even by Theodoret, that the Latins were on the anti-Nestorian side.

Ft246 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1411-1418; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1571.

Ft247 The passage, “et vulnerarentur multi ex laicis et falsis monachis, qui nobiscum erant,” according to the corresponding passage in the second memorial of the Antiochene deputies to the Emperor (see below, p. 108; and Mansi, t. iv. p. 1404; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1566), must be corrected to “et vulnerarentur multi qui aobiscum erant, a laicis et falsis monachis.” In the second memorial it is “A servis, monachorum habitu indutis.” Ft248 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1407, t. v. p. 799; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1568.

Ft249 See below, pp. 108, 110, and 116.

Ft250 That it was sent to the Emperor after his departure from Constantinople is declared by the superscription, in Hardouin, t. i. p. 1563; and Mansi, t. v. p. 802. Cf. ibid. t. iv. p. 1401, note 1.

Ft251 In Mansi, t. v. p. 802 sqq.

Ft252 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1401; and Hardouin, t. i. p. 1563.

Ft253 As is shown by what follows, this refers chiefly to Jerusalem. The Antiochenes accused the party of Cyril of having promised Juvenal of Jerusalem, in reward for his assistance, their support in his endeavour to obtain a higher hierarchical position. In fact, however, as we saw above, p. 77, Cyril did the reverse.

Ft254 The same thing is asserted in the only notice which we possess from the orthodox side, in Mansi, t. v. pp. 255 and 659; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1667.

Ft255 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1403, t. v. p. 805; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1565.

Ft256 Mansi, t. v. p. 798. According to a letter of Acacius of Beroca, to be mentioned hereafter, the Emperor had confirmed the deposition of Cyril and Memnon anew, because it was shown that the eunuch Scholasticus had received presents from Cyril. See below, p. 112.

Tillemont (Memoires etc., t. xiv. p. 448) supposes that this new edict was speedily recalled, because the Antiochene deputies never boasted of it.

Ft257 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1405; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1566.

Ft258 We learn this from the single document, already noticed, which we possess from the orthodox side, in Mansi, t. v. pp. 255 and 659; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1667.

Ft259 Formerly this edict was known only in Latin in the Synodicon, in Mansi, t. v. p. 805. Cotelerius was the first to publish it in Greek, in his Monim. eccl. Graecae, t. i. p. 41, from which it was taken by Hardouin, t. i. p. 1615, and Mansi, t. iv. p. 1465.

Ft260 Mansi, t. v. p. 805.

Ft261 Mansi, t. v. p. 258 and 659; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1667.

Ft262 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1420, t. v. p. 801; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1579.

Ft263 In Mansi, t. iv. p. 1408, t. v. p. 810; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1569. In several copies this discourse of Theodoret has the superscription “Dicta in Chalcedone, dum essent abituri.” That this indication of time is correct, is clear from the subsequent discourse of John of Antioch. — Entirely without foundation was the doubt of Lupus whether this discourse really belonged to Theodoret. Cf. on the other side Garnier in his edition of the works of Theodoret (re-edited by Schulze), t. v. p. 106.

Ft264 Mansi, t. iv. p. 1410, t. v. p. 812; Hardouin, t. i. p. 1571; Theodoret, Opp. ed. Sehulze, t. v. p. 110.

Ft265 He was not a brother’s son, but the son of a sister of Cyril’s named Isidora. Cf. the paper which his brother Athanasius, a priest of Alexandria, presented to the Council of Chalcedon. Hardouin, t. ii. p. 331; Mansi, t. vi. p. 1022 sqq.

Ft266 Mansi, t. v. p. 819.

Ft267 S. Leonis, ep. 79 (59), ed. Ballet, t. i. p. 1035.

Ft268 Suidas, Lexic. s.v. “Puleheria;” Baron. ad ann. 431, n. 162; Walch, Ketzergesch. Bd. 5 S. 551.

Ft269 Cf. my treatise on Cyril Lucar etc., in the Tubing. theol.

Quartalschrift, 1843, 553 f., and 563, and in the Beitrage zur Kirchengesch. etc., Tubing. 1864, Bd. i. S. 452 and 458.

CHAPTER - Fta1 Socrates, Hist. Eccl. 7:37.

Fta2 Socrates, l. c. 7:35. The Bollandists give a complete account of him, Acta SS. t. 2. April, p. 847 sq. (Commentar. de S. Maxim.). Cf.

Tillemont, Memoires etc., t. 14. p. 488.

Fta3 In Mansi, t. 5. p. 257; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1669.

Fta4 In Mansi, t. 5 pp. 258 and 259 sqq.

Fta5 Mansi, t. 5 p. 265; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1671.

Fta6 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 269 sqq.; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1674 sqq.

Fta7 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 266 sqq.; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1671.

Fta8 In Mansi, t. 5 pp. 813, 814; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1632 sq.

Fta9 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 920, c. 141, and p. 953, c. 174.

Fta10 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 843, c. 66, and p. 917, c. 136.

Fta11 Socrat. lib. 7 c. 34; Liberat. Breviar. c. 6; Mansi, t. 5 p. 986.

Fta12 Cf. the letter of Bishop Acacius in Mansi, t. 5 p. 819.

Fta13 Cf. Tillemont, l.c. p. 507 sqq.

Fta14 Cf. the letters on the subject in Mansi, t. 5 c. 45, p. 822; c. 48 and 49, p. 825 sq.; c. 70, p. 846, and c. 71, p. 847. On the difficulties which may be raised on this incidental point, especially the question of competence, cf. Tillemont, l. c. p. 496 sq.

Fta15 Mansi, t. 5 p. 821 sq., c. 43, 44; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1633 sq. Cf.

Tillemont, l. c. p. 504 sqq.

Fta16 Gennadius, De Script. eccl. in Vita Coelestini, c. 54 in Fabric. Biblioth. eccl. p. 26.

Fta17 Coustant, Epistolae Pontiffcum, p. 1231; Walch, Ketzergesch. Bd. S. 578.

Fta18 Compare the two letters of Sixtus in Mansi, t. 5 p. 374 sq., and Constant, Epist. Pontif. p. 1231 sq. The one of them is directed to Cyril; the other, on the contrary, is a circular letter, which was intended also for the Orientals, although the superscription here also names Cyril as the person to whom it is addressed.

Fta19 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 326.

Fta20 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 278; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1683.

Fta21 In Mansi, t. 5 pp. 281 and 828; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1685.

Fta22 In Mansi, t. 5 pp. 283 and 828; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1687.

Fta23 Cf. Cyrilli Epist. ad Acac. Melit. in Mansi, t. 5 p. 310.

Fta24 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 827.

Fta25 On these Synods compare the treatise of Mansi, t. 5 p. 1155 sqq.

Fta26 In Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1634; Mansi, t. 5 p. 829, c. 53; p. 830, c. 54, and p. 840, c. 60. John of Antioch speaks of ten propositions, in Mansi, l. c. c. 77, p. 855.

Fta27 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 830, c. 54; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1635. German in Fuchs, l. c. S. 204.

Fta28 Cf. the heading of c. 53, in Mansi, t. 5 p. 829, and Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1643; Propositiones etc.

Fta29 In Mansi, t. 5 pp. 309, 347, and 887.

Fta30 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 831 sqq.

Fta31 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 988.

Fta32 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 830, c. 55; p. 840, c. 61, and p. 988, c. 203.

Fta33 Acacius refers to this in Mansi, t. 5 p. 830, c. 55.

Fta34 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 831, c. 55.

Fta35 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 835, 837 sq.

Fta36 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 839.

Fta37 Mansi, t. 5 p. 840 sq. c. 60.

Fta38 Mansi, t. 5 p. 840, c. 61.

Fta39 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 841 sq. c. 62 and 63.

Fta40 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 842, c. 64, and p. 843, c. 65.

Fta41 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 843, c. 66.

Fta42 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 844, c. 67.

Fta43 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 845 sq. c. 68 and 69.

Fta44 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 846 sq. c. 70 and 71.

Fta45 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 849, c. 72.

Fta46 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 850 sqq. c. 73 and 74.

Fta47 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 856 sqq.

Fta48 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 988.

Fta49 Theodoret, Epist . 112, t. 4 Opp. p. 1186, ed. Schulze.

Fta50 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 853.

Fta51 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 916.

Fta52 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 855, c. 77.

Fta53 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 855, c. 78.

Fta54 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 303; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1703.

Fta55 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 291; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1691.

Fta56 The conclusion of this introduction resembles the shorter introduction of the earlier form of the same creed. See p. 93 f.

Fta57 To this point the creed is identical with that on p. 93 f. The remainder is a new addition.

Fta58 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 303 sqq.; Hardouin, t. 1. p. 1703. The original text of this creed is as follows: JJOmologou~men toigarou~n torion hJmw~n jIhsou~n Cristoleion kai< a]nqrwpon te>leion ejk yuch~v logikh~v kai< sw>matov pro aijw>nwn menta kata< ththat, ejp j ejsca>twn de< tw~n hJmerw~n to>n aujtoran swthri>an ejk Mari>av th~v parqe>nou kata< ththat oJmoou>sion tw~| patri< tothat, kai< oJmoou>sion hJmi~n kata< ththat du>o gasewn e[nwsiv ge>gone dio< e[na Cristorion oJmologou~men kata< tau>thn thtou ejnw>sewv e]nnoian oJmologou~men than parqe>non qeoto>kon, dia< to< togon sarkwqh~nai kai< ejnanqrwph~sai, kai< ejx aujth~v th~v sullh>yewv eJnw~sai eJautw~| tonta na>on taou fwnagouv a]ndrav tapou, tao fu>sewn kai< tapou, tao fu>sewn kai< tathat tou~ Cristou~, tathat aujtou~ paradido>ntav .

Fta59 Mansi, t. 5 p. 988 and 311.

Fta60 Cf. his Epist. ad Acac. Melet. in Mansi, t. 5 p. 311, and his Epist. ad Donat. ibid. p. 350.

Fta61 Mansi, l.c. pp. 313, 350.

Fta62 This document in Mansi, t. 5 p. 287; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1689.

Fta63 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 293 sqq.; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1693 sqq.

Fta64 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 350.

Fta65 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 859.

Fta66 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 938.

Fta67 In Mansi, l. c.

Fta68 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 987 sqq.

Fta69 Cyrilli Epist. ad Theognostum, etc., in Cyrilli Opp. t. 5 P. 2 p. 158, and his Epist. ad Donat. in Mansi, t. 5 p. 350.

Fta70 Cyrilli Epist. ad Theognostum, l. c.

Fta71 Compare the letter of John to Cyril among the letters of the latter, in Cyrilli Opp. t. 5 P. 2 div. 2, p. 153.

Fta72 Probably these terms proceed from the Antiochenes, and belong to the alterations in the text of Cyril of which we have spoken.

Fta73 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 285; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1687.

Fta74 In Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1691; Mansi, t. 5 p. 289 sqq. In Latin only, ibid. p. 667 sqq.

Fta75 In Cyrilli Opp. t. 5 P. 2 p. 153 sq.

Fta76 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 867, c. 86.

Fta77 So Facundus relates, lib. 1 c. 5.

Fta78 Mansi, t. 5 p. 301 sqq.; Hardouin, t. 2 p. 119 sqq.

Fta79 Mansi, t. 5 p. 289; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1689.

Fta80 Tillemont, Memoires, t. 14 p. 547, and note 76, Sur St. Cyrille, ibid. p. 782; Walch, Ketzerhist. Bd. 5 S. 617.

Fta81 Mansi, t. 5 pp. 347, 351; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1707.

Fta82 Mansi, t. 5 p. 871.

Fta83 Mansi, t. 5 p. 751.

Fta84 Mansi, t. 5 pp. 371, 379; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1707 sqq.; cf. Pagi, Critica in annal. Baron. ad ann. 433, n. 1-4.

Fta85 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 353 sqq.

Fta86 Isidor. Pehs. Epist. lib. 1 no. 324.

Fta87 Liberati Breviar. c. 8, p. 669.

Fta88 It is still extant in two Latin translations in Mansi, t. 5 pp. 860, 998.

Fta89 This is probably a later addition.

Fta90 Mansi, t. 5 p. 315, in Cyril’s letter to Bishop Acacius of Melitene.

Fta91 Mansi, t. 5 pp. 317 and 323, in the same letter.

Fta92 How Cyril understood this, see below, p. 142 f.

Fta93 Mansi, t. 5 p. 319, in the same letter, and p. 345 in the letter to Eulogius.

Fta94 Mansi, t. 5 p. 343, in the letter of Cyril to Eulogius.

Fta95 Mansi, t. 5 p. 319, in the letter to Acacius of Melitene.

Fta96 Mansi, t. 5 p. 319.

Fta97 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 320.

Fta98 E.g. Mansi, 1. c. p. 320: dierjrJi>fqw pou makragcutov . So at p. 345 in the letter to Eulogius, where he declares it to be a lie to ascribe to him the Apollinarian doctrine o[ti su>gkrasiv ejge>neto h] su>gcusiv .

Fta99 Mansi, t. 5 p. 319, in the letter to Acacius of Melitene.

Fta100 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 322, in the same letter, and p. 345 in the letter to Eulogius.

Fta101 The Arians, as is well known, had referred to the Logos those expressions of the Scriptures which implied subordination, and had reference to the manhood of Christ.

Fta102 Mansi, t. 5 p. 323 sq. in the same letter.

Fta103 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 309 sqq.

Fta104 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 343 sqq.

Fta105 In Opp. Cyrilli, t. 5 P. 2 p. 135 sqq. and p. 141 sqq., among the letters of Cyril.

Fta106 Cyrilli Opp. l.c. p. 138 sqq.

Fta107 Mansi, t. 5 p. 326.

Fta108 Ibid. p. 370.

Fta109 Ibid. p. 868.

Fta110 Ibid. pp. 870, 873, 892.

Fta111 Ibid. p. 874, c. 93.

Fta112 Mansi, t. 5 p. 874, c. 94.

Fta113 Ibid. p. 878, c. 96.

Fta114 Ibid. p. 879, c. 97.

Fta115 Ibid. p. 880, c. 98, 99.

Fta116 Ibid. p. 881, c. 100.

Fta117 Mansi, t. 5 p. 876, c. 95.

Fta118 Ibid. p. 882, c. 101, and p. 884, c. 103.

Fta119 Ibid. p. 883 sq. c. 102 and 104.

Fta120 Ibid. p. 885, c. 105.

Fta121 Ibid. p. 885, c. 105.

Fta122 Ibid. p. 898 sq. c. 120.

Fta123 Ibid. p. 869, c. 88.

Fta124 Ibid. p. 899, c. 121.

Fta125 Memoires, t. 14 p. 553, and note 78, Sur St. Gyrille.

Fta126 His last letter to John, in Mansi, t. 5 p. 916, c. 136.

Fta127 Mansi, t. 5 p. 884 sqq. c. 104.

Fta128 Mansi, t. 5 p. 893 sqq.

Fta129 Ibid. p. 892, c. 116, and p. 898, c. 118.

Fta130 Ibid. p. 890, c. 113, and 891, c. 114.

Fta131 Ibid. p. 904.

Fta132 Mansi, t. 5 p. 905.

Fta133 Ibid. p. 906.

Fta134 Ibid. p. 907, c. 126.

Fta135 Ibid. p. 907, c. 127.

Fta136 Mansi, t. 5 p. 821, c. 43; p. 885, c. 101; p. 885, c. 106.

Fta137 Ibid. p. 907, c. 128.

Fta138 Ibid. p. 908, c. 129.

Fta139 Ibid . p. 910, c. 130, and p. 911, c. 131.

Fta140 Ibid. p. 912 sqq. c. 133.

Fta141 Ibid. p. 914, c. 134.

Fta142 Ibid. p. 918, c. 137.

Fta143 Mansi, t. 5 p. 915, c. 135.

Fta144 Ibid. p. 920, c. 140.

Fta145 Cf. the answer of Meletius, ibid. p. 920 sq. c. 141.

Fta146 Ibid. p. 923, c. 143.

Fta147 Ibid. p. 922, c. 142.

Fta148 Ibid. p. 938, c. 160; p. 941, c. 164.

Fta149 Ibid. p. 923, c. 144.

Fta150 Ibid. p. 924, c. 145.

Fta151 Ibid. p. 941, c. 164.

Fta152 Ibid. p. 938, c. 160.

Fta153 Ibid. p. 925, c. 146.

Fta154 Mansi, t. 5 p. 926, c. 147.

Fta155 Ibid. p. 927, c. 148.

Fta156 Ibid. p. 928, c. 149.

Fta157 Ibid. p. 930, c. 151.

Fta158 Ibid. p. 931, c. 152.

Fta159 Ibid. p. 938, c. 160.

Fta160 Ibid. p. 944, c. 166, and p. 946, c. 168.

Fta161 Mansi, t. 5 p. 965, c. 190. The further documents on these irreconcilables are given ibid. p. 959 sqq. c. 180-187, and p. 951 sqq. c. 174-179.

Fta162 Ibid. p. 255, c. 15.

Fta163 Mansi, t. 5 p. 413; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1715. A decree put forth by the prefects to secure obedience to this imperial command is given in Mansi, t. 5 p. 415, and Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1717.

Fta164 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 967, c. 192; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1721.

Fta165 Ibid. p. 973, c. 197.

Fta166 Ibid. p. 969, c. 194, 195.

Fta167 Mansi, t. 5 p. 972, c. 197.

Fta168 Ibid. p. 996, c. 219.

Fta169 Ibid. t. 7 p. 241; Hardouin, t. 2 p. 527.

Fta170 Ibid. t. 5 p. 976, c. 200.

Fta171 Ibid. p. 421; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1723.

Fta172 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 383.

Fta173 Cyrilli Opp. t. 5 P. 2 Epist. ad Lampon. et Clericos, p. 198. Also in Mansi, t. 5 p. 993, c. 206.

Fta174 In Mansi, t. 5 p. 974, c. 198.

Fta175 Ibid. pp. 1182, 1183, 1185.

Fta176 Ibid. p. 1009, c. 219.

Fta177 The history is given with great completeness by Tillemont, t. 14 p. 624 sqq.; more briefly by Baluzius in Mansi, t. 5 p. 1181, and by Walch, Ketzerh. Bd. 5 S. 641-646.

Fta178 See above, p. 152, and Mansi, t. 5 p. 418; Hardouin, t. 1 p. 1719.

Fta179 Memoires, t. 14 p. 615 sqq.