11:1 {Unto Bethphage and Bethany} (eis beqfage kai beqanian). Both together as in #Lu 19:29, though #Mt 21:1 mentions only Bethphage. See discussion in Matthew for this and the Mount of Olives.

11:2 {As ye enter} (eisporeuomenoi). So also #Lu 19:30. Present middle participle. {Colt} (pwlon). So #Lu 19:30. #Mt 21:2 speaks of the ass (onon) also. {Whereon no one ever yet sat} (ef' hon oudeis anqrwpwn ekaqisen). So #Lu 19:30.

11:3 {The Lord} (ho kurios). So Matt. and Luke. See on ¯Mt 21:3 for discussion of this word applied to Jesus by himself. {He will send him back} (apostellei). Present indicative in futuristic sense. #Mt 21:3 has the future apostelei.

11:4 {A colt tied at the door without in the open street} (pwlon dedemenon pros quran exw epi tou amfodou). A carefully drawn picture. The colt was outside the house in the street, but fastened (bound, perfect passive participle) to the door. "The better class of houses were built about an open court, from which a passage way under the house led to the street outside. It was at this outside opening to the street that the colt was tied" (Gould). The word amfodos (from amfw, both, and hodos, road) is difficult. It apparently means road around a thing, a crooked street as most of them were (cf. Straight Street in #Ac 9:11). It occurs only here in the N.T. besides D in #Ac 19:28. It is very common in the papyri for _vicus_ or "quarter." {And they loose him} (kai luousin auton). Dramatic present tense. Perhaps Peter was one of those sent this time as he was later (#Lu 22:8). If so, that explains Mark's vivid details here.

11:5 {Certain of those that stood there} (tines twn ekei hestekotwn). Perfect active participle, genitive plural. Bystanders. #Lu 19:33 terms them "the owners thereof" (hoi kurioi autou). The lords or masters of the colt. They make a natural protest.

11:7 {They bring the colt unto Jesus} (ferousin ton pwlon pros ton iesoun). Vivid historical present. The owners acquiesced as Jesus had predicted. Evidently friends of Jesus.

11:8 {Branches} (stibadas). A litter of leaves and rushes from the fields. Textus Receptus spells this word stoibadas. #Mt 21:8 has kladous, from klaw, to break, branches broken or cut from trees. #Joh 12:13 uses the branches of the palm trees (ta baia twn foinikwn), "the feathery fronds forming the tufted crown of the tree" (Vincent). That is to say, some of the crowd did one of these things, some another. See on ¯Mt 21:4-9 for discussion of other details. The deliberate conduct of Jesus on this occasion could have but one meaning. It was the public proclamation of himself as the Messiah, now at last for his "hour" has come. The excited crowds in front (hoi proagontes) and behind (hoi akolouqountes) fully realize the significance of it all. Hence their unrestrained enthusiasm. They expect Jesus, of course, now to set up his rule in opposition to that of Caesar, to drive Rome out of Palestine, to conquer the world for the Jews.

11:11 {When he had looked round about upon all things} (peribleyamenos panta). Another Markan detail in this aorist middle participle. Mark does not give what #Lu 19:39-55 has nor what #Mt 21:10-17 does. But it is all implied in this swift glance at the temple before he went out to Bethany with the Twelve, {it being now eventide} (oye ede ouses tes hwras). Genitive absolute, the hour being already late. What a day it had been! What did the apostles think now?

11:12 {On the morrow} (tei epaurion). #Mt 21:18 has "early" (prwi), often of the fourth watch before six A.M. this was Monday morning. The Triumphal Entry had taken place on our Sunday, the first day of the week.

11:13 {If haply he might find anything thereon} (ei ara ti heuresei en autei). this use of ei and the future indicative for purpose (to see if, a sort of indirect question) as in #Ac 8:22; 17:27. Jesus was hungry as if he had had no food on the night before after the excitement and strain of the Triumphal Entry. The early figs in Palestine do not get ripe before May or June, the later crop in August. It was not the season of figs, Mark notes. But this precocious tree in a sheltered spot had put out leaves as a sign of fruit. It had promise without performance.

11:14 {No man eat fruit from thee henceforward forever} (meketi eis ton aiwna ek sou medeis karpon fagoi). The verb fagoi is in the second aorist active optative. It is a wish for the future that in its negative form constitutes a curse upon the tree. #Mt 21:19 has the aorist subjunctive with double negative ou meketi genetai, a very strong negative prediction that amounts to a prohibition. See on Matthew. Jesus probably spoke in the Aramaic on this occasion. {And his disciples heard it} (kai ekouon hoi maqetai autou). Imperfect tense, "were listening to it," and evidently in amazement, for, after all, it was not the fault of the poor fig tree that it had put out leaves. One often sees peach blossoms nipped by the frost when they are too precocious in the changeable weather. But Jesus offered no explanation at this time.

11:15 {Began to cast out} (erxato ekballein). Mark is fond of "began." See on ¯Mt 21:12f. for discussion of this second cleansing of the temple in its bearing on that in #Joh 2:14f. {Money-changers} (kollubistwn). this same late word in #Mt 21:12 which see for discussion. It occurs in papyri.

11:16 {Through the temple} (dia tou hierou). The temple authorities had prohibited using the outer court of the temple through the Precinct as a sort of short cut or by-path from the city to the Mount of Olives. But the rule was neglected and all sorts of irreverent conduct was going on that stirred the spirit of Jesus. this item is given only in Mark. Note the use of hina after efie (imperfect tense) instead of the infinitive (the usual construction).

11:17 {For all the nations} (pasin tois eqnesin). Mark alone has this phrase from #Isa 56:7; Jer 7:11. The people as well as the temple authorities were guilty of graft, extortion, and desecration of the house of prayer. Jesus assumes and exercises Messianic authority and dares to smite this political and financial abuse. Some people deny the right of the preacher to denounce such abuses in business and politics even when they invade the realm of morals and religion. But Jesus did not hesitate.

11:18 {Sought how they might destroy him} (ezetoun pws auton apoleswsin). Imperfect indicative, a continuous attitude and endeavor. Note deliberative subjunctive with pws retained in indirect question. Here both Sadducees (chief priests) and Pharisees (scribes) combine in their resentment against the claims of Jesus and in the determination to kill him. Long ago the Pharisees and the Herodians had plotted for his death (#Mr 3:6). Now in Jerusalem the climax has come right in the temple. {For they feared him} (efobounto gar). Imperfect middle indicative. Hence in wrath they planned his death and yet they had to be cautious. The Triumphal Entry had shown his power with the people. And now right in the temple itself "all the multitude was astonished at his teaching" (pas ho oclos exeplesseto epi tei didacei autou). Imperfect passive. The people looked on Jesus as a hero, as the Messiah. this verse aptly describes the crisis that has now come between Christ and the Sanhedrin.

11:19 {Every evening} (hotan oye egeneto). Literally, {whenever evening came on} or more exactly {whenever it became late}. The use of hotan (hote an) with the aorist indicative is like hopou an with the imperfect indicative (eiseporeueto) and hosoi an with the aorist indicative (heyanto) in #Mr 6:56. The use of an makes the clause more indefinite and general, as here, unless it renders it more definite, a curious result, but true. #Lu 21:37 has the accusative of extent of time, "the days,"the nights." The imperfect tense he (or they) would go (exeporeueto, exeporeuonto) out of the city suggests "whenever" as the meaning here.

11:20 {As they passed by in the morning} (paraporeuomenoi prwi). Literally, passing by in the morning. The next morning. They went back by the lower road up the Mount of Olives and came down each morning by the steep and more direct way. Hence they saw it. #Mt 21:20 does not separate the two mornings as Mark does. {From the roots} (ek rizwn). Mark alone gives this detail with exerammenen perfect passive predicate participle from xerainw.

11:21 {Peter calling to remembrance} (anamnesqeis ho petros). First aorist participle, being reminded. Only in Mark and due to Peter's story. For his quick memory see also #14:72. {Which thou cursedst} (hen katerasw). First aorist middle indicative second person singular from kataraomai. It almost sounds as if Peter blamed Jesus for what he had done to the fig tree.

11:22 {Have faith in God} (ecete pistin qeou). Objective genitive qeou as in #Gal 2:26; Ro 3:22,26. That was the lesson for the disciples from the curse on the fig tree so promptly fulfilled. See this point explained by Jesus in #Mt 21:21 which see for " this mountain" also.

11:23 {Shall not doubt in his heart} (me diakriqei en tei kardiai autou). First aorist passive subjunctive with hos an. The verb means a divided judgment (dia from duo, two, and krinw, to judge). Wavering doubt. Not a single act of doubt (diakriqei), but continued faith (pisteuei). {Cometh to pass} (ginetai). Futuristic present middle indicative.

11:24 {Believe that ye have received them} (pisteuete hoti elabete). That is the test of faith, the kind that sees the fulfilment before it happens. elabete is second aorist active indicative, antecedent in time to pisteuete, unless it be considered the timeless aorist when it is simultaneous with it. For this aorist of immediate consequence see #Joh 15:6.

11:25 {Whensoever ye stand} (hotan stekete). Late form of present indicative stekw, from perfect stem hesteka. In LXX. Note use of hotan as in #11:19. Jesus does not mean by the use of "stand" here to teach that this is the only proper attitude in prayer. {That your Father also may forgive you} (hina kai ho pater afei humin). Evidently God's willingness to forgive is limited by our willingness to forgive others. this is a solemn thought for all who pray. Recall the words of Jesus in #Mt 6:12,14f.

11:26 this verse is omitted by Westcott and Hort. The Revised Version puts it in a footnote.

11:27 {The chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders} (hoi arciereis kai hoi grammateis kai hoi presbuteroi). Note the article with each separate group as in #Lu 20:1 and #Mt 21:23. These three classes were in the Sanhedrin. Clearly a large committee of the Sanhedrin including both Sadducees and Pharisees here confront Jesus in a formal attack upon his authority for cleansing the temple and teaching in it.

11:28 {By what authority} (en poiai exousiai). this question in all three Gospels was a perfectly legitimate one. See on ¯Mt 21:23-27 for discussion. Note present subjunctive here (hina tauta poieis), that you keep on doing these things.

11:30 {Answer me} (apokriqete moi). this sharp demand for a reply is only in Mark. See also verse #29. Jesus has a right to take this turn because of John's direct relation to himself. It was not a dodge, but a home thrust that cleared the air and defined their attitude both to John and Jesus. They rejected John as they now reject Jesus.

11:31 {If we say} (ean eipwmen). Third-class condition with aorist active subjunctive. The alternatives are sharply presented in their secret conclave. They see the two horns of the dilemma clearly and poignantly. They know only too well what Jesus will say in reply. They wish to break Christ's power with the multitude, but a false step now will turn the laugh on them. They see it.

11:32 {But should we say} (alla eipwmen). Deliberative subjunctive with aorist active subjunctive again. It is possible to supply ean from verse #31 and treat it as a condition as there. So #Mt 21:26 and #Lu 20:6. But in Mark the structure continues rugged after "from menw with anacoluthon or even aposiopesis--"they feared the people" Mark adds. Matthew has it: "We fear the multitude." Luke puts it: "all the people will stone us." All three Gospels state the popular view of John as a prophet. Mark's "verily" is ontws really, actually. They feared John though dead as much as Herod Antipas did. His martyrdom had deepened his power over the people and disrespect towards his memory now might raise a storm (Swete).