11:1 {He departed thence to teach and preach} (metebe ekeiqen tou didaskein kai kerussein). In five instances (#7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; 26:1) after great discourses by Jesus "the transition to what follows is made with the formula, 'And it came to pass when Jesus had ended'" (McNeile). this is a wrong chapter division, for #11:1 belongs with the preceding section. "{Commanding}" (diatass"n, complementary participle with etelesen), means giving orders in detail (dia-) for each of them. Note both "teach and preach" as in #4:23. Where did Jesus go? Did he follow behind the twelve as he did with the seventy "whither he himself was about to come" (#Lu 10:1)? Bruce holds with Chrysostom that Jesus avoided the places where they were, giving them room and time to do their work. But, if Jesus himself went to the chief cities of Galilee on this tour, he would be compelled to touch many of the same points. Jesus would naturally follow behind at some distance. At the end of the tour the apostles come together in Capernaum and tell Jesus all that they had done and that they had taught (#Mr 6:30). Matthew follows the general outline of Mark, but the events are not grouped in chronological order here.

11:2 {John heard in the prison} (ho de iwanes akousas en twi desmwteriwi). Probably (#Lu 7:18) the raising of the son of the widow of Nain. The word for prison here is the place where one was kept bound (#Ac 5:21,23; 16:26). See #Mt 4:12. It was in Machaerus east of the Dead Sea which at this time belonged to the rule of Herod Antipas (Jos. _Ant_. XVIII. v.2). John's disciples had access to him. So he sent word by (dia, not duo as in #Lu 7:19) them to Jesus.

11:3 {He that cometh} (ho ercomenos). this phrase refers to the Messiah (#Mr 11:9; Lu 13:35; 19:38; Heb 10:37; Ps 118:26; Da 7:13). Some rabbis applied the phrase to some forerunner of the kingdom (McNeile). Was there to be "another" (heteron) after Jesus? John had been in prison "long enough to develop a _prison mood_" (Bruce). It was once clear enough to him, but his environment was depressing and Jesus had done nothing to get him out of Machaerus (see chapter IX in my _John the Loyal_). John longed for reassurance.

11:4 {The things which ye do hear and see} (ha akouete kai blepete). this symbolical message was for John to interpret, not for them.

11:5 {And the dead are raised up} (kai nekroi egeirontai). Like that of the son of the widow of Nain. Did he raise the dead also on this occasion? "Tell John your story over again and remind him of these prophetic texts, #Isa 35:5; 61:1" (Bruce). The items were convincing enough and clearer than mere eschatological symbolism. "The poor" in particular have the gospel, a climax.

11:6 {Whosoever shall find none occasion of stumbling in me} (hos an me skandalisqei en emoi). Indefinite relative clause with first aorist passive subjunctive. this beatitude is a rebuke to John for his doubt even though in prison. Doubt is not a proof of superior intellect, scholarship, or piety. John was in the fog and that is the time not to make serious decisions. "In some way even the Baptist had found some occasion of stumbling in Jesus" (Plummer).

11:7 {As these went their way} (toutwn poreuomenwn). Present participle genitive absolute. The eulogy of Jesus was spoken as the two disciples of John were going away. Is it a matter of regret that they did not hear this wondrous praise of John that they might cheer him with it? "It may almost be called the funeral oration of the Baptist, for not long afterwards Herodias compassed his death" (Plummer). {A reed shaken by the wind} (kalamon hupo anemou saleuomenon). Latin _calamus_. Used of the reeds that grew in plenty in the Jordan Valley where John preached, of a staff made of a reed (#Mt 27:29), as a measuring rod (#Re 11:1), of a writer's pen (#3Jo 1:13). The reeds by the Jordan bent with the wind, but not so John.

11:9 {And much more than a prophet} (kai perissoteron profetou). Ablative of comparison after perissoteron itself comparative though meaning exceeding (surrounded by, overflowing). John had all the great qualities of the true prophet: "Vigorous moral conviction, integrity, strength of will, fearless zeal for truth and righteousness" (Bruce). And qen he was the Forerunner of the Messiah (#Mal 3:1).

11:11 {He that is but little} (ho mikroteros). The Authorized Version here has it better, "he that is least." The article with the comparative is a growing idiom in the vernacular _Koin‚_ for the superlative as in the modern Greek it is the only idiom for the superlative (Robertson, _Grammar of the Greek N.T._, p. 668). The papyri and inscriptions show the same construction. The paradox of Jesus has puzzled many. He surely means that John is greater (meizwn) than all others in character, but that the least in the kingdom of heaven surpasses him in privilege. John is the end of one age, "until John" (#11:14), and the beginning of the new era. All those that come after John stand upon his shoulders. John is the mountain peak between the old and the new.

11:12 {Suffereth violence} (biazetai). this verb occurs only here and in #Lu 16:16 in the N.T. It seems to be middle in Luke and Deissmann (_Bible Studies_, p. 258) quotes an inscription "where biazomai is without doubt reflexive and absolute" as in #Lu 16:16. But there are numerous papyri examples where it is passive (Moulton and Milligan, _Vocabulary_, etc.) so that "there seems little that promises decisive help for the difficult logion of #Mt 11:12; Lu 16:16." So qen in #Mt 11:12 the form can be either middle or passive and either makes sense, though a different sense. The passive idea is that the kingdom is forced, is stormed, is taken by men of violence like "men of violence take it by force" (biastai harpazousin autˆn) or seize it like a conquered city. The middle voice may mean "experiences violence" or "forces its way" like a rushing mighty wind (so Zahn holds). These difficult words of Jesus mean that the preaching of John "had led to a violent and impetuous thronging to gather round Jesus and his disciples" (Hort, _Judaistic Christianity_, p. 26).

11:14 { this is Elijah} (autos estin eleias). Jesus here endorses John as the promise of Malachi. The people understood #Mal 4:1 to mean the return of Elijah in person. this John denied as to himself (#Joh 1:21). But Jesus affirms that John is the Elijah of promise who has come already (#Mt 17:12). He emphasizes the point: "He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

11:17 {Children sitting in the market places} (paidiois kaqemenois en tais agorais). this parable of the children playing in the market place is given also in #Lu 7:31f. Had Jesus as a child in Nazareth not played games with the children? He had certainly watched them often since. The interest of Christ in children was keen. He has really created the modern child's world out of the indifference of the past. They would not play wedding or funeral in a peevish fret. These metaphors in the Gospels are vivid to those with eyes to see. The agora was originally the assembly, qen the forum or public square where the people gathered for trade or for talk as in Athens (#Ac 17:17) and in many modern towns. So the Roman Forum. The oriental bazaars today are held in streets rather than public squares. Even today with all the automobiles children play in the streets. In English the word "cheap" (Cheapside) meant only barter and price, not cheap in our sense. The word for mourn (ekopsasthe) means to beat the heart, direct middle, after the fashion of eastern funeral lamentations.

11:19 {Wisdom is justified by her works} (edikaiwqe apo twn ergwn autes). A timeless aorist passive (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 836f.). The word "justified" means "set right" Luke (#Lu 7:35) has "by all her children" as some MSS. have here to make Matthew like Luke. These words are difficult, but understandable. God's wisdom has planned the different conduct of both John and Jesus. He does not wish all to be just alike in everything. " this generation" (verse #16) is childish, not childlike, and full of whimsical inconsistencies in their faultfinding. They exaggerate in each case. John did not have a demon and Jesus was not a glutton or a winebibber. "And, worse than either, for filos is used in a sinister sense and implies that Jesus was the comrade of the worst characters, and like them in conduct. A malicious nickname at first, it is now a name of honor: the sinner's lover" (Bruce). Cf. #Lu 15:2. The plan of God is justified by results.

11:20 {Most of his mighty works} (hai pleistai dunameis autou). Literally, "His very many mighty works" if elative as usual in the papyri (Moulton, _Prolegomena_, p. 79; Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 670). But the usual superlative makes sense here as the Canterbury translation has it. this word dunamis for miracle presents the notion of _power_ like our _dynamite_. The word teras is wonder, portent, _miraculum_ (miracle) as in #Ac 2:19. It occurs only in the plural and always with semeia. The word semeion means sign (#Mt 12:38) and is very common in John's Gospel as well as the word ergon (work) as in #Joh 5:36. Other words used are paradoxon, our word _paradox_, strange (#Lu 5:26), endoxon, glorious (#Lu 13:17), thaumasion, wonderful (#Mt 21:15).

11:21 {Chorazin} (corazein). Mentioned only here and in #Lu 10:13. Proof of "the meagreness of our knowledge of Judaism in the time of Christ" (Plummer) and of the many things not told in our Gospels (#Joh 21:25). We know something of beqsaida and more about Capernaum as places of privilege. But (plen, however) neither of these cities repented, changed their conduct. Note condition of the second class, determined as unfulfilled in verses #21 and #23.

11:25 {At that season Jesus answered and said} (en ekeinwi twi kairwi apokriqeis eipen). Spoke to his Father in audible voice. The time and place we do not know. But here we catch a glimpse of Jesus in one of his moods of worship. "It is usual to call this golden utterance a prayer, but it is at once prayer, praise, and self-communing in a devout spirit" (Bruce). Critics are disturbed because this passage from the logia of Jesus or Q of Synoptic criticism (#Mt 11:25-30; Lu 10:21-24) is so manifestly Johannine in spirit and very language, "the Father" (ho pater), "the son" (ho huios), whereas the Fourth Gospel was not written till the close of the first century and the logia was written before the Synoptic Gospels. The only satisfying explanation lies in the fact that Jesus did have this strain of teaching that is preserved in John's Gospel. Here he is in precisely the same mood of elevated communion with the Father that we have reflected in John 14 to 17. Even Harnack is disposed to accept this logion as a genuine saying of Jesus. The word "thank" (homologoumai) is better rendered "praise" (Moffatt). Jesus praises the Father "not that the sofoi were ignorant, but that the nepioi knew" (McNeile).

11:26 {Wellpleasing in thy sight} (eudokia emprosqen sou). "For such has been thy gracious will" (Weymouth).

11:27 {All things have been delivered unto me of my Father} (panta moi paredoqe hupo tou patros mou). this sublime claim is not to be whittled down or away by explanations. It is the timeless aorist like edothˆ in #28:18 and "points back to a moment in eternity, and implies the pre-existence of the Messiah" (Plummer). The Messianic consciousness of Christ is here as clear as a bell. It is a moment of high fellowship. Note epiginwskei twice for "fully know." Note also boulˆtai =wills, is willing. The Son retains the power and the will to reveal the Father to men.

11:28 {Come unto me} (deute pros me). Verses 28 to 30 are not in Luke and are among the special treasures of Matthew's Gospel. No sublimer words exist than this call of Jesus to the toiling and the burdened (pephortismenoi, perfect passive participle, state of weariness) to come to him. He towers above all men as he challenges us. "I will refresh you" (k'ago anapaus" h-mas). Far more than mere rest, rejuvenation. The English slang expression "rest up" is close to the idea of the Greek compound ana-pauw. It is causative active voice.