There is a good amount of evidence that dinosaurs lived with man. Evidence that a few dinosaurs still exist today in remote locations, such as the Congo.
Eye witness, fresh fleshly remains of dinosaurs, human and dinosaur footprints together, artifacts showing humans interacting with dinosaurs, stories upon stories of dinosaurs being killed off in history, sightings of dinosaurs today. Potential skin of a dinosaur and other dinosaur artifacts.
Standard evolutionary geologists and biologists basically claim that \""IF\"" there was any dinosaurs in existence today, they were be a breading population of them.
And if that was the case, we should readily see such populations.
The problem with this argument is that only 4% of the Congo has been explored. Its like claiming to have looked for an item you lost in your room, while only looking in 4% of it.
Same is the case with the ocean. Only 5% of the ocean has been explored.
How is it they can claim there is no dinosaur when only 5% has been explored where they potentially live?
Same was the case with the Panda bear. For many years, geologists discounted its existence.
There were even expeditions to China to find this \""so called Panda bear\"". The first expedition was a failure. Many years later a second scientific expedition was sent and finally the Panda bear was considered to \""exist\"".
How could this not be the very same thing here? How is it our \""scientific community\"" can declare that dinosaurs died out millions of years ago when there are thousands of stories of them living in the time of man and even sightings today.
