The London Artifact is an iron hammer, surrounded by a solid mass of cretaceous rock. The handle was partially PETRIFIED. It was discovered in London, Texas. Notice the shiny spot on the metal part. The family who found the hammer, filed the metal to see if it was really metal; the spot has not rusted yet, even though it has been about forty-five years. Is it really iron? A test was done on the metal. This hammer contains 96% iron, 2.6% chlorine, and 0.74% sulfur. There are no bubbles in it at all. Yes, it is iron. The quality of which equals or exceeds the quality of any iron found today.

UPDATED— Wednesday, August 25, 2004   

Filled with scientific facts against evolution, a massive collection, one of the most complete anti-evolution websites on the internet. You have come to the right place. Stay awhile and learn the truth. Those fairy tales you were taught in school are excess baggage. What you want are scientific facts. This website is full of them.

This is a very large website, containing a fabulous amount of scientific data disproving evolutionary theory. And it is constantly growing. Book-mark this site; you will often want to return and visit us. There is information here that you need.
What is included here:

EVOLUTION CRUNCHER Table of Contents  Contents of the book: EVOLUTION CRUNCHER

The Cruncher is an updated digest of the 3-volume set and contains the best of it. Written over a 12-month period, the set is based on data in several hundred scientific papers and scholarly articles, as well as over 200 creationist books and journals. Secular scientists have a lot to say about evolutionary theory. Many of them thoroughly dislike it. The author collected thousands of statements by scientists (most of them non-creationists), arranged them in their logical categories, and connected them with comments.

The 3-VOLUME ENCYCLOPEDIA Table of Contents— Contents of the 3-volume CREATION -EVOLUTION ENCYCLOPEDIA. 

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: 

NEW — New Articles  

HIDING HUMANITY'S TRUE HISTORY - 'THE BRAIN POLICE'

PROTEIN: THE BRAINLESS WONDER   

NATURE — Wonders of Nature -Amazing things in nature, which could not possibly by produced by evolution, but which, instead, point to their Creator.

SEARCH — Go exploring and find what you want

RELATED AREAS —

GUIDES — Research and Study Guides; Bibliography - Helpful information which may assist you in your research work or as you teach these subjects. Includes bibliographies.

Creationists Organizations — Listing for many organizations  If you want to get in contact with other Creationist organizations, this is how to find them.

BOOKSTORE — Description of our books, plus how to order them.  Amazingly low bulk prices on Evolution Cruncher!

Further Information Links

A WORD OF CLARIFICATION:

In regard to origins, there are only two possibilities. Either someone made everything or everything made itself. There are no alternatives.

In our world today, evolutionary theory (of which there are three commonly accepted varieties: Darwinian, neo-Darwinian, and saltation) stands as the chief representative of one position. Creationism is the other position.

Someone may ask, “What about pantheism and Gaea?” Pantheism declares that everything is god, and the Gaea theory fancifully says that our world is a god. Since both teach that matter made itself, they are just forms of evolution. 

So there are two possible ways that matter, stellar objects, plants and animals came into existence. Only two.

How can we know which is correct? One way is by observing the things of nature. We call that science. That is what researchers do.

The Cruncher provides you with thousands of items of data from scientific research and observation. It clearly establishes that evolution cannot possibly be the causal agent of matter, objects, or life.

That leaves us with Creationism as the only means by which everything came into existence.

Someone will ask, “But what are the evidences that Creationism is true?” There are two. 

First, the only alternative is clearly disproved by a massive amount of findings.

Second,—and if possible —even more solid, we have the very existence of everything about us! Whether it be the whirling of electrons in the atom, the orbit of our world which mysteriously does not decay and crash us into the sun, or the existence of a living creature.

Can anyone, viewing a hummingbird in action and knowing that all its hundreds of organs are packed inside something the size of a marble, believe the myth that, way back, it originated when a lightning bolt hit some dirty seawater?

Come now, not even a four-year-old would believe that one.

Not evolution, but a creative act of God brought everything into existence.

However, the mountain of scientific data now available to us also narrows the range of that Creation act. It obviously occurred rather  recently, only within the last few thousand years. We know this because the condition and arrangement of sedimentary strata show it was rapidly laid down by a worldwide Flood only a few millenniums ago (chapter 12, Fossils and Strata). We also know it because of 58 dramatic findings that our world is youthful (chapter 4, Age of the Earth).

Other types of scientific evidence establish the fact that, contrary to what some Christians suggest, no evolving from one species to another has occurred. The original species remain intact, but they have produced many sub-species.

Although neither the book of Genesis nor any other part of the Bible is used in the Cruncher as scientific evidence, we should note that those Christians who choose to embrace evolutionary theory deny the reality of the Genesis accounts of the Creation and the Flood. If we cannot trust Genesis, what can we trust? 

In addition, according to the Bible, sin and death began after the fall of Adam and Eve. But that important truth would be negated by the theory that savagery, violence, and sudden killing reigned for millions of years on our planet before Adam and Eve came into existence.

So that brings us back to two views of origins, evolution or Creation—only two. By accepting the one, we reject the other. They cannot be blended.

 “I have often thought how little I should like to have to prove organic evolution in a court of law.”—*Errol White, Proceedings of the Linnean Society, London (1966) [an ichthyologist (expert on fish) in a 1988 address before a meeting of the Linnean Society in London].

“I doubt if there is any single individual within the scientific community who could cope with the full range of  [creationist] arguments without the help of an army of consultants in special fields.”—*David M. Raup, “Geology and Creation,” Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural History, Vol. 54, March 1983, p. 18.

“The evolutionary establishment fears creation science, because evolution itself crumbles when challenged by evidence. In the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of public debates were arranged between evolutionary scientists and creation scientists. The latter scored resounding victories, with the result that, today, few evolutionists will debate. Isaac Asimov, Stephen Jay Gould, and the late Carl Sagan, while highly critical of creationism, all declined to debate.”—James Perloff, Tornado in a Junkyard (1999), p. 241.

“No one has ever found an organism that is known not to have parents, or a parent. This is the strongest evidence on behalf of evolution.”—*Tom Bethell, “Agnostic Evolutionists,” Harper’s, February 1985, p. 61.

“As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of being, as we see them, well-defined species?”—*Charles Darwin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1866), p. 139.

“Evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to bend their observations to fit in with it.”—*H. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution,” Physics Bulletin 31 (1980), p. 138