Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter VI.—Explanation of the words of Christ, “No man knoweth the Father, but the Son,” etc.; which words the heretics misinterpret. Proof that, by the Father revealing the Son, and by the Son being revealed, the Father was never unknown. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter VI.—Explanation of the words
of Christ, “No man knoweth the Father, but the Son,” etc.; which words the
heretics misinterpret. Proof that, by the Father revealing the Son, and by the
Son being revealed, the Father was never unknown.
1. For the Lord, revealing Himself to His
disciples, that He Himself is the Word, who imparts knowledge of the
Father, and reproving the Jews, who imagined that they, had [the
knowledge of] God, while they nevertheless rejected His Word, through
whom God is made known, declared, “No man knoweth the Son, but the
Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whom
the Son has willed to reveal [Him].”3857 Thus hath Matthew set it
down,
and Luke in like manner, and Mark3858
3858 Not now to be found in Mark’s Gospel. |
the very same; for John omits this passage. They, however, who would be
wiser than the apostles, write [the verse] in the following manner:
“No man knew the Father, but the Son; nor the Son, but the
Father, and he to whom the Son has willed to reveal [Him];” and
they explain it as if the true God were known to none prior to our
Lord’s advent; and that God who was announced by the prophets, they
allege not to be the Father of Christ.
2. But if Christ did then [only] begin to have
existence when He came [into the world] as man, and [if] the Father did
remember [only] in the times of Tiberius Cæsar to provide for [the wants
of] men, and His Word was shown to have not always coexisted with His
creatures; [it may be remarked that] neither then was it necessary that
another God should be proclaimed, but [rather] that the reasons for so
great carelessness and neglect on His part should be made the subject of
investigation. For it is fitting that no such question should arise, and
gather such strength, that it would indeed both change God, and destroy
our faith in that Creator who supports us by means of His creation. For
as we do direct our faith towards the Son, so also should we possess a
firm and immoveable love towards the Father. In his book against Marcion,
Justin3859
3859 Photius, 125,
makes mention of Justin Martyr’s work, λόγοι
κατὰ Μαρκίωνος. See also
Eusebius’s Ecclesiastical History, book iv. c. 18, where
this passage of Irenæus is quoted. [The vast importance of
Justin’s startling remark is that it hinges on the words of Christ
Himself, concerning His antecedents and notes as set forth in the
Scriptures, St. John v. 30–39.] |
does well say: “I would not have believed the Lord Himself, if He
had announced any other than He who is our framer, maker, and nourisher.
But because the only-begotten Son came to us from the one God, who both
made this world and formed us, and contains and administers all things,
summing up His own handiwork in Himself, my faith towards Him is
stedfast, and my love to the Father immoveable, God bestowing both upon
us.”
3. For no one can know the Father,
unless through the Word of God, that is, unless by the Son revealing
[Him]; neither can he have knowledge of the Son, unless through the good
pleasure of the Father. But the Son performs the good pleasure of the
Father; for the Father sends, and the Son is sent, and comes. And His
Word knows that His Father is, as far as regards us, invisible and
infinite; and since He cannot be declared [by any one else], He does
Himself declare Him to us; and, on the other hand, it is the Father alone
who knows His own Word. And both these truths has our Lord declared.
Wherefore the Son reveals the knowledge of the Father through His own
manifestation. For the manifestation of the Son is the knowledge of the
Father; for all things are manifested through the Word. In order,
therefore, that we might know that the Son who came is He who imparts to
those believing on Him a knowledge of the Father, He said to His
disciples:3860
3860 [A most
emphatic and pregnant text which Irenæus here expounds with great
beauty. The reference (St. Matt. xi. 27) seems to
have been inadvertently omitted in this place where the repetition is
desirable.] | “No man knoweth the Son but the Father, nor
the Father but the Son, and those to whomsoever the Son shall reveal
Him;” thus setting Himself forth and the Father as He [really] is,
that we may not receive any other Father, except Him who is revealed by
the Son.
4. But this [Father] is the Maker of heaven and earth,
as is shown from His words; and not he, the false father, who has been
invented by Marcion, or by Valentinus, or by Basilides, or by
Carpocrates, or by Simon, or by the rest of the “Gnostics,”
falsely so called. For none of these was the Son of God; but Christ Jesus
our Lord [was], against whom they set their teaching in opposition, and
have the daring to preach an unknown God. But they ought to hear [this]
against themselves: How is it that He is unknown, who is known by them?
for, whatever is known even by a few, is not unknown. But the Lord did
not say that both the Father and the Son could not be known at all (in
totum), for in that case His advent would have been superfluous. For
why did He come hither? Was it that He should say to us, “Never
mind seeking after God; for He is unknown, and ye shall not find
Him;” as also the disciples of Valentinus falsely declare that
Christ said to their Æons? But this is indeed vain. For the Lord taught
us that no man is capable of knowing God, unless he be taught of God;
that is, that God cannot be known without God: but that this is the
express will of the Father, that God should be known. For they shall
know3861
3861 The ordinary text
reads cognoscunt, i.e., do know; but Harvey thinks it should be
the future—cognoscent. | Him to whomsoever the
Son has revealed Him.
5. And for this purpose did the Father reveal the Son,
that through His instrumentality He might be manifested to all, and might
receive those righteous ones who believe in Him into incorruption and
everlasting enjoyment (now, to believe in Him is to do His will); but He
shall righteously shut out into the darkness which they have chosen for
themselves, those who do not believe, and who do consequently avoid His
light. The Father therefore has revealed Himself to all, by making His
Word visible to all; and, conversely, the Word has declared to all the
Father and the Son, since He has become visible to all. And therefore the
righteous judgment of God [shall fall] upon all who, like
others, have seen, but have not, like others, believed.
6. For by means of the creation itself, the Word
reveals God the Creator; and by means of the world [does He declare] the
Lord the Maker of the world; and by means of the formation [of man] the
Artificer who formed him; and by the Son that Father who begat the Son:
and these things do indeed address all men in the same manner, but all do
not in the same way believe them. But by the law and the prophets did the
Word preach both Himself and the Father alike [to all]; and all the
people heard Him alike, but all did not alike believe. And through the
Word Himself who had been made visible and palpable, was the Father shown
forth, although all did not equally believe in Him; but all saw the
Father in the Son: for the Father is the invisible of the Son, but the
Son the visible of the Father. And for this reason all spake with Christ
when He was present [upon earth], and they named Him God. Yea, even the
demons exclaimed, on beholding the Son: “We know Thee who Thou art,
the Holy One of God.”3862 And the
devil looking at Him, and tempting Him, said: “If Thou art the Son
of God;”3863 —all thus indeed seeing and speaking of the Son and the
Father, but all not believing [in them].
7. For it was fitting that the truth should receive
testimony from all, and should become [a means of] judgment for the
salvation indeed of those who believe, but for the condemnation of those
who believe not; that all should be fairly judged, and that the faith in
the Father and Son should be approved by all, that is, that it should be
established by all [as the one means of salvation], receiving testimony
from all, both from those belonging to it, since they are its friends,
and by those having no connection with it, though they are its enemies.
For that evidence is true, and cannot be gainsaid, which elicits even
from its adversaries striking3864
3864 Singula, which with Massuet we here understand in
the sense of singularia. | testimonies in its behalf;
they being convinced with respect to the matter in hand by their own
plain contemplation of it, and bearing testimony to it, as well as
declaring it.3865
3865 Some,
instead of significantibus, read signantibus,
“stamping it as true.” | But after a while they
break forth into enmity, and become accusers [of what they had approved],
and are desirous that their own testimony should not be [regarded as]
true. He, therefore, who was known, was not a different being from Him
who declared “No man knoweth the Father,” but one and the
same, the Father making all things subject to Him; while He received
testimony from all that He was very man, and that He was very God, from
the Father, from the Spirit, from angels, from the creation itself, from
men, from apostate spirits and demons, from the enemy, and last of all,
from death itself. But the Son, administering all things for the Father,
works from the beginning even to the end, and without Him no man can
attain the knowledge of God. For the Son is the knowledge of the Father;
but the knowledge of the Son is in the Father, and has been revealed
through the Son; and this was the reason why the Lord declared: “No
man knoweth the Son, but the Father; nor the Father, save the Son, and
those to whomsoever the Son shall reveal [Him].”3866
3866 Matt. xi. 27;
Luke x. 22. Harvey observes here, that “it is
remarkable that this text, having been correctly quoted a short time
previously in accordance with the received Greek text, ᾧ ἐὰν βούλητας ὁ υἱὸς ἀποκαλύψαι, the
translator now not only uses the single verb revelaverit, but says
pointedly that it was so written by the venerable author.” It is
probable, therefore, that the previous passage has been made to harmonize
with the received text by a later hand; with which, however, the Syriac
form agrees. | For “shall reveal” was said not with
reference to the future alone, as if then [only] the Word had begun to
manifest the Father when He was born of Mary, but it applies
indifferently throughout all time. For the Son, being present with His
own handiwork from the beginning, reveals the Father to all; to whom He
wills, and when He wills, and as the Father wills. Wherefore, then, in
all things, and through all things, there is one God, the Father, and one
Word, and one Son, and one Spirit, and one salvation to all who believe
in Him.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|