Marcion's Object in Adulterating the Gospel. No Difference Between the Christ of the Creator and the Christ of the Gospel. No Rival Christ Admissible. The Connection of the True Christ with the Dispensation of the Old Testament Asserted. - ANF03. Latin Christianity: Its Founder, Tertullian

Bad Advertisement?

Are you a Christian?

Online Store:

Visit Our Store

Marcion's Object in Adulterating the Gospel. No Difference Between the Christ of the Creator and the Christ of the Gospel. No Rival Christ Admissible. The Connection of the True Christ with the Dispensation of the Old Testament Asserted.
PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP

Chapter VI.—Marcion’s Object in Adulterating the Gospel. No Difference Between the Christ of the Creator and the Christ of the Gospel. No Rival Christ Admissible. The Connection of the True Christ with the Dispensation of the Old Testament Asserted.

But we now advance a step further on, and challenge (as we promised to do) the very Gospel of Marcion, with the intention of thus proving that it has been adulterated. For it is certain³⁶²⁰

³⁶²⁰ Certe, for certo.
that the whole aim at which he has strenuously laboured even in the drawing up of his Antitheses, centres in this, that he may establish a diversity between the Old and the New Testaments, so that his own Christ may be separate from the Creator, as belonging to this rival god, and as alien from the law and the prophets. It is certain, also, that with this view³⁶²¹

³⁶²¹ Propterea.
he has erased everything that was contrary to his own opinion and made for the Creator, as if it had been interpolated by His advocates, whilst everything which agreed with his own opinion he has retained. The latter statements we shall strictly examine;³⁶²²

³⁶²² Conveniemus.
and if they shall turn out rather for our side, and shatter the assumption of Marcion, we shall embrace them. It will then become evident, that in retaining them he has shown no less of the defect of blindness, which characterizes heresy, than he displayed when he erased all the former class of subjects. Such, then, is to be³⁶²³

³⁶²³ Sic habebit.
the drift and form of my little treatise; subject, of course, to whatever condition may have become requisite on both sides of the question.³⁶²⁴

³⁶²⁴ This seems to be the sense of the words, “sub illa utique conditione quæ ex utraque parte condicta sit.”
Marcion has laid down the position, that Christ who in the days of Tiberius was, by a previously unknown god, revealed for the salvation of all nations, is a different being from Him who was ordained by God the Creator for the restoration of the Jewish state, and who is yet to come. Between these he interposes the separation of³⁶²⁵

³⁶²⁵ Scindit.
a great and absolute difference—as great as lies between what is just and what is good;³⁶²⁶

³⁶²⁶ That is, between what is severe and judicial and punitive on one side, that is, the Creator’s; and what is mild, merciful, and forgiving, on the other, that is, the Redeemer’s side (Rigalt.).
as great as lies between the law and the gospel; as great, (in short,) as is the difference between Judaism and Christianity. Hence will arise also our rule,³⁶²⁷

³⁶²⁷ Præscriptio.
by which we determine³⁶²⁸

³⁶²⁸ Defigimus.
that there ought to be nothing in common between the Christ of the rival god and the Creator; but that (Christ) must be pronounced to belong to the Creator,³⁶²⁹

³⁶²⁹ Creatoris pronunciandum.
if He has administered His dispensations, fulfilled His prophecies, promoted³⁶³⁰

³⁶³⁰ Adjuverit.
His laws, given reality to³⁶³¹

³⁶³¹ Repræsentaverit.
His promises, revived His mighty power,³⁶³²

³⁶³² Restauraverit virtutes ejus.
remoulded His determinations,³⁶³³

³⁶³³ Sententias reformaverit.
expressed His attributes, His properties. This law and this rule I earnestly request the reader to have ever in his mind, and so let him begin to investigate whether Christ be Marcion’s or the Creator’s.
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH