Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| The Son in Union with the Father in the Creation of All Things. This Union of the Two in Co-Operation is Not Opposed to the True Unity of God. It is Opposed Only to Praxeas' Identification Theory. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter XIX.—The Son in
Union with the Father in the Creation of All Things. This Union of the
Two in Co-Operation is Not Opposed to the True Unity of God. It is
Opposed Only to Praxeas’ Identification Theory.
But this very declaration of His they will hastily
pervert into an argument of His singleness. “I
have,” says He, “stretched out the heaven
alone.” Undoubtedly alone as regards all other
powers; and He thus gives a premonitory evidence against the
conjectures of the heretics, who maintain that the world was
constructed by various angels and powers, who also make the Creator
Himself to have been either an angel or some subordinate agent sent to
form external things, such as the constituent parts of the world, but
who was at the same time ignorant of the divine purpose. If,
now, it is in this sense that He stretches out the heavens alone, how
is it that these heretics assume their position so perversely, as to
render inadmissible the singleness of that Wisdom which says,
“When He prepared the heaven, I was present with
Him?”7989 —even though
the apostle asks, “Who hath known the mind of the Lord, or who
hath been His counsellor?”7990 meaning, of
course, to except that wisdom which was present with Him.7991 In Him, at any rate, and with Him, did
(Wisdom) construct the universe, He not being ignorant of what she was
making. “Except Wisdom,” however, is a phrase of the same
sense exactly as “except the Son,” who is Christ,
“the Wisdom and Power of God,”7992
according to the apostle, who only knows the mind of the Father.
“For who knoweth the things that be in God, except the Spirit
which is in Him?”7993 Not, observe,
without Him. There was therefore One who caused God to be not
alone, except “alone” from all other gods. But
(if we are to follow the heretics), the Gospel itself will have to be
rejected, because it tells us that all things were made by God through
the Word, without whom nothing was made.7994
And if I am not mistaken, there is also another passage in which it is
written: “By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made,
and all the hosts of them by His Spirit.”7995
Now this Word, the Power of God and the Wisdom of God, must be the very
Son of God. So that, if (He did) all things by the Son, He must
have stretched out the heavens by the Son, and so not have stretched
them out alone, except in the sense in which He is “alone”
(and apart) from all other gods. Accordingly He says, concerning the
Son, immediately afterwards: “Who else is it that frustrateth the
tokens of the liars, and maketh diviners mad, turning wise men
backward, and making their knowledge foolish, and confirming the
words7996 of His Son?”7997
7997 On this reading,
see our Anti-Marcion, p. 207, note 9. Edin. | —as, for instance, when He said,
“This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye
Him.”7998 By thus attaching
the Son to Himself, He becomes His own interpreter in what sense He
stretched out the heavens alone, meaning alone with His Son,
even as He is one with His Son. The utterance, therefore, will be in
like manner the Son’s, “I have stretched out the heavens
alone,”7999 because by the
Word were the heavens established.8000
Inasmuch, then, as the heaven was prepared when Wisdom was present in
the Word, and since all things were made by the Word, it is quite
correct to say that even the Son stretched out the heaven alone,
because He alone ministered to the Father’s work. It must also be
He who says, “I am the First, and to all futurity I
AM.”8001 The Word, no doubt,
was before all things. “In the beginning was the
Word;”8002 and in that
beginning He was sent forth8003 by the Father. The
Father, however, has no beginning, as proceeding from none; nor can He
be seen, since He was not begotten. He who has always been alone could
never have had order or rank. Therefore, if they have determined
that the Father and the Son must be regarded as one and the same, for
the express purpose of vindicating the unity of God, that unity of His
is preserved intact; for He is one, and yet He has a Son, who is
equally with Himself comprehended in the same Scriptures. Since they
are unwilling to allow that the Son is a distinct Person, second
from the Father, lest, being thus second, He should cause two Gods to
be spoken of, we have shown above8004
8004 See ch. xiii. p.
107. | that Two are
actually described in Scripture as God and Lord. And to
prevent their being offended
at this fact, we give a reason why they are not said to be two Gods and
two Lords, but that they are two as Father and Son; and this not by
severance of their substance, but from the dispensation wherein we
declare the Son to be undivided and inseparable from the
Father,—distinct in degree, not in state. And although, when
named apart, He is called God, He does not thereby constitute two Gods,
but one; and that from the very circumstance that He is entitled to be
called God, from His union with the Father.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|