Chapter XLIII - ANF04. Fathers of the Third Century: Tertullian, Part Fourth; Minucius Felix; Commodian; Origen, Parts First and Second

Bad Advertisement?

Are you a Christian?

Online Store:

Visit Our Store

Chapter XLIII
PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP

Chapter XLIII.

Mark now, whether he who charges us with having committed errors of the most impious kind, and with having wandered away from the (true meaning) of the divine enigmas, is not himself clearly in error, from not observing that in the writings of Moses, which are much older not merely than Heraclitus and Pherecydes, but even than Homer, mention is made of this wicked one, and of his having fallen from heaven. For the serpent⁴⁴⁹⁰

⁴⁴⁹⁰ Cf. Gen. iii.
—from whom the Ophioneus spoken of by Pherecydes is derived—having become the cause of man’s expulsion from the divine Paradise, obscurely shadows forth something similar, having deceived the woman⁴⁴⁹¹

⁴⁴⁹¹ τὸ θηλύτερον γένος.
by a promise of divinity and of greater blessings; and her example is said to have been followed also by the man. And, further, who else could the destroying angel mentioned in the Exodus of Moses⁴⁴⁹²

⁴⁴⁹² Cf. Ex. xii. 23.
be, than he who was the author of destruction to them that obeyed him, and did not withstand his wicked deeds, nor struggle against them? Moreover (the goat), which in the book of Leviticus⁴⁴⁹³

⁴⁴⁹³ Cf. Lev. xvi. 8.
is sent away (into the wilderness), and which in the Hebrew language is named Azazel, was none other than this; and it was necessary to send it away into the desert, and to treat it as an expiatory sacrifice, because on it the lot fell. For all who belong to the “worse” part, on account of their wickedness, being opposed to those who are God’s heritage, are deserted by God.⁴⁴⁹⁴

⁴⁴⁹⁴ ἐναντίοι ὄντες τοῖς ἁπὸ τοῦ κλήρου τοῦ Θεοῦ, ἔρημοί εἰσι Θεοῦ.
Nay, with respect to the sons of Belial in the book of Judges,⁴⁴⁹⁵

⁴⁴⁹⁵ [Judg. xix. 22. S.]
whose sons are they said to be, save his, on account of their wickedness? And besides all these instances, in the book of Job, which is older even than Moses himself,⁴⁴⁹⁶

⁴⁴⁹⁶ [See the elaborate articles on the book of Job, by Canon Cook, in Dr. Smith’s Dictionary of the Bible, vol. i. pp. 1087–1100. S.]
the devil is distinctly described as presenting himself before God,⁴⁴⁹⁷

⁴⁴⁹⁷ Cf. Job i. 11.
and asking for power against Job, that he might involve him in trials⁴⁴⁹⁸

⁴⁴⁹⁸ περιστάσεσί.
of the most painful kind; the first of which consisted in the loss of all his goods and of his children, and the second in afflicting the whole body of Job with the so-called disease of elephantiasis.⁴⁴⁹⁹

⁴⁴⁹⁹ ἀγρίῳ ἐλέφαντι.
I pass by what might be quoted from the Gospels regarding the devil who tempted the Saviour, that I may not appear to quote in reply to Celsus from more recent writings on this question. In the last (chapter)⁴⁵⁰⁰

⁴⁵⁰⁰ Cf. Job xl. 20.
also of Job, in which the Lord utters to Job amid tempest and clouds what is recorded in the book which bears his name, there are not a few things referring to the serpent. I have not yet mentioned the passages in Ezekiel,⁴⁵⁰¹

⁴⁵⁰¹ Cf. Ezek. xxxii. 1–28.
where he speaks, as it were, of Pharaoh, or Nebuchadnezzar, or the prince of Tyre; or those in Isaiah,⁴⁵⁰²

⁴⁵⁰² Isa. xiv. 4 sqq.
where lament is made for the king of Babylon, from which not a little might be learned concerning evil, as to the nature of its origin and generation, and as to how it derived its existence from some who had lost their wings,⁴⁵⁰³

⁴⁵⁰³ πτεροῤῥυησάντων. Cf. supra, bk. iv. cap. xl. p. 516.
and who had followed him who was the first to lose his own.
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH