Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter XXXII PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
XXXII.
Celsus next assails the doctrine of the
resurrection, which is a high and difficult doctrine, and one which
more than others requires a high and advanced degree of wisdom to set
forth how worthy it is of God; and how sublime a truth it is which
teaches us that there is a seminal principle lodged in that which
Scripture speaks of as the “tabernacle” of the soul, in
which the righteous “do groan, being burdened, not for that they
would be unclothed, but clothed upon.”4749 Celsus ridicules this doctrine because
he does not understand it, and because he has learnt it from ignorant
persons, who were unable to support it on any reasonable grounds.
It will be profitable, therefore, that in addition to what we have said
above, we should make this one remark. Our teaching on the
subject of the resurrection is not, as Celsus imagines, derived from
anything that we have heard on the doctrine of metempsychosis; but we
know that the soul, which is immaterial and invisible in its nature,
exists in no material place, without having a body suited to the nature
of that place. Accordingly, it at one time puts off one body
which was necessary before, but which is no longer adequate in its
changed state, and it exchanges it for a second; and at another time it
assumes another in addition to the former, which is needed as a better
covering, suited to the purer ethereal regions of heaven. When it
comes into the world at birth, it casts off the integuments which it
needed in the womb; and before doing this, it puts on another body
suited for its life upon earth. Then, again, as there is “a
tabernacle” and “an earthly house” which is in some
sort necessary for this tabernacle, Scripture teaches us that
“the earthly house of this tabernacle shall be dissolved,”
but that the tabernacle shall “be clothed upon with a house not
made with hands, eternal in the heavens.”4750 The men of God say also that
“the corruptible shall put on incorruption,”4751 which is a different thing from “the
incorruptible;” and “the mortal shall put on
immortality,” which is different from “the
immortal.” Indeed, what “wisdom” is to
“the wise,” and “justice” to “the
just,” and “peace” to “the peaceable,”
the same relation does “incorruption” hold to “the
incorruptible,” and “immortality” to “the
immortal.” Behold, then, to what a prospect Scripture
encourages us to look, when it speaks to us of being clothed with
incorruption and immortality, which are, as it were, vestments which
will not suffer those who are covered with them to come to corruption
or death. Thus far I have taken the liberty of referring to this
subject, in answer to one who assails the doctrine of the resurrection
without understanding it, and who, simply because he knew nothing about
it, made it the object of contempt and ridicule.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|