Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Heracleon's View that the Logos is Not the Agent of Creation. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
8. Heracleon’s
View that the Logos is Not the Agent of Creation.
It was, I consider, a violent and unwarranted procedure
which was adopted by Heracleon,4693
4693 On the fragments
of Heracleon in this work of Origen, see Texts and Studies, vol.
i. part iv. by A. E. Brooke, M.A. | the friend, as
it is said, of Valentinus, in discussing this sentence:
“All things were made through Him.” He excepted the
whole world and all that it contains, excluding, as far as his
hypothesis goes, from the “all things” what is best in the
world and its contents. For he says that the æon (age), and
the things in it, were not made by the Logos; he considers them to have
come into existence before the Logos. He deals with the
statement, “Without Him was nothing made,” with some degree
of audacity, nor is he afraid of the warning:4694 “Add not to His words, lest He
find thee out and thou prove a liar,” for to the
“Nothing” he adds: “Of what is in the world and
the creation.” And as his statements on the passage are
obviously very much forced and in the face of the evidence, for what he
considers divine is excluded from the all, and what he regards as
purely evil is, that and nothing else, the all things, we need not
waste our time in rebutting what is, on the face of it, absurd, when,
without any warrant from Scripture, he adds to the words,
“Without Him was nothing made,” the further words,
“Of what is in the earth and the creation.” In this
proposal, which has no inner probability to recommend it, he is asking
us, in fact, to trust him as we do the prophets, or the Apostles, who
had authority and were not responsible to men for the writings
belonging to man’s salvation, which they handed to those about
them and to those who should come after. He had, also, a private
interpretation of his own of the words: “All things were
made through Him,” when he said that it was the Logos who caused
the demiurge to make the world, not, however, the Logos from whom or by
whom, but Him through whom, taking the written words in a different
sense from that of common parlance.4695
4695 Accepting
Jacobi’s and Brook’s correction παρα τὴν. | For, if
the truth of the matter was as he considers, then the writer ought to
have said that all things were made through the demiurge by the Word,
and not through the Word by the demiurge. We accept the
“through whom,” as it is usually understood, and have
brought evidence in support of our interpretation, while he not only
puts forward a new rendering of his own, unsupported by the divine
Scripture, but appears even to scorn the truth and shamelessly and
openly oppose it. For he says: “It was not the Logos
who made all things, as under another who was the operating
agent,” taking the “through whom” in this sense,
“but another made them, the Logos Himself being the operating
agent.” This is not a suitable occasion for the proof that
it was not the demiurge who became the servant of the Logos and made
the world; but that the Logos became the servant of the demiurge and
formed the world. For, according to the prophet David,4696 “God spake and they came into being,
He commanded and they were created.” For the unbegotten God
commanded the first-born of all creation,4697
and they were created, not only the world and what is therein, but also
all other things, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or
powers, for all things were made through Him and unto Him, and He is
before all things.”E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|