Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| There Were Two Embassies to John the Baptist; The Different Characters of These. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
5. There Were Two
Embassies to John the Baptist; The Different Characters of
These.
Here the enquiry suggests itself whether the second
testimony is concluded, and whether there is a third, addressed to
those who were sent from the Pharisees. They wished to know why
he baptized, if he was neither the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the prophet;
and he said:4835 “I
baptize with water; but there standeth one among you whom you know not,
He that cometh after me, the latchet of whose shoe I am not worthy to
unloose.” Is this a third testimony, or is this which they
were to report to the Pharisees a part of the second? As far as
the words allow me to conjecture I should say that the word to the
emissaries of the Pharisees was a third testimony. It is to be
observed, however, that the first testimony asserts the divinity of the
Saviour, while the second disposes of the suspicion of those who were
in doubt whether John could be the Christ, and the third declares one
who was already present with men although they saw Him not, and whose
coming was no longer in the future. Before going on to the
subsequent testimonies in which he points out Christ and witnesses to
Him, let us look at the second and third, word for word, and let us, in
the first place, observe that there are two embassies to the Baptist,
one “from Jerusalem” from the Jews, who send priests and
levites, to ask him, “Who art thou?” the second sent by the
Pharisees,4836 who were in doubt
about the answer which had been made to the priests and levites.
Observe how what is said by the first envoys is in keeping with the
character of priests and levites, and shows gentleness and a
willingness to learn. “Who art thou?” they say, and
“What then? art thou Elijah?” and “Art thou that
prophet?” and then, “Who art thou, that we may give an
answer to them that sent us? What sayest thou of
thyself?” There is nothing harsh or arrogant in the
enquiries of these men; everything agrees well with the character of
true and careful servants of God; and they raise no difficulties about
the replies made to them. Those, on the contrary, who are sent
from the Pharisees assail the Baptist, as it were, with arrogant and
unsympathetic words: “Why then baptizest thou if thou be
not the Christ nor Elijah nor the prophet?” This mission is
sent scarcely for the sake of information, as in the former case of the
priests and levites, but rather to debar the Baptist from baptizing, as
if it were thought that no one was entitled to baptize but Christ and
Elijah and the prophet. The student who desires to understand the
Scripture must always proceed in this careful way; he must ask with
regard to each speech, who is the speaker and on what occasion it was
spoken. Thus only can we discern how speech harmonizes with the
character of the speaker, as it does all through the sacred
books.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|