Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Whether It is Reasonable in the Platonists to Determine that the Celestial Gods Decline Contact with Earthly Things and Intercourse with Men, Who Therefore Require the Intercession of the Demons. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
16.—Whether It is Reasonable in the Platonists to Determine that
the Celestial Gods Decline Contact with Earthly Things and
Intercourse with Men, Who Therefore Require the Intercession of the
Demons.
That opinion, which the same
Platonist avers that Plato uttered, is not true, “that no god
holds intercourse with men.”352 And this, he says, is the chief
evidence of their exaltation, that they are never contaminated by
contact with men. He admits, therefore, that the demons are
contaminated; and it follows that they cannot cleanse those by whom
they are themselves contaminated, and thus all alike become impure,
the demons by associating with men, and men by worshipping the
demons. Or, if they say that the demons are not contaminated by
associating and dealing with men, then they are better than the
gods, for the gods, were they to do so, would be contaminated.
For this, we are told, is the glory of the gods, that they are so
highly exalted that no human intercourse can sully them. He
affirms, indeed, that the supreme God, the Creator of all things,
whom we call the true God, is spoken of by Plato as the only God
whom the poverty of human speech fails even passably to describe;
and that even the wise, when their mental energy is as far
as
possible delivered from the trammels of connection with
the body, have only such gleams of insight into His nature as may
be compared to a flash of lightning illumining the darkness. If,
then, this supreme God, who is truly exalted above all things, does
nevertheless visit the minds of the wise, when emancipated from the
body, with an intelligible and ineffable presence, though this be
only occasional, and as it were a swift flash of light athwart the
darkness, why are the other gods so sublimely removed from all
contact with men, as if they would be polluted by it? as if it were
not a sufficient refutation of this to lift up our eyes to those
heavenly bodies which give the earth its needful light. If the
stars, though they, by his account, are visible gods, are not
contaminated when we look at them, neither are the demons
contaminated when men see them quite closely. But perhaps it is
the human voice, and not the eye, which pollutes the gods; and
therefore the demons are appointed to mediate and carry men’s
utterances to the gods, who keep themselves remote through fear of
pollution? What am I to say of the other senses? For by smell
neither the demons, who are present, nor the gods, though they were
present and inhaling the exhalations of living men, would be
polluted if they are not contaminated with the effluvia of the
carcasses offered in sacrifice. As for taste, they are pressed by
no necessity of repairing bodily decay, so as to be reduced to ask
food from men. And touch is in their own power. For while it
may seem that contact is so called, because the sense of touch is
specially concerned in it, yet the gods, if so minded, might mingle
with men, so as to see and be seen, hear and be heard; and where is
the need of touching? For men would not dare to desire this, if
they were favored with the sight or conversation of gods or good
demons; and if through excessive curiosity they should desire it,
how could they accomplish their wish without the consent of the god
or demon, when they cannot touch so much as a sparrow unless it be
caged?
There is, then, nothing to hinder
the gods from mingling in a bodily form with men, from seeing and
being seen, from speaking and hearing. And if the demons do thus
mix with men, as I said, and are not polluted, while the gods, were
they to do so, should be polluted, then the demons are less liable
to pollution than the gods. And if even the demons are
contaminated, how can they help men to attain blessedness after
death, if, so far from being able to cleanse them, and present them
clean to the unpolluted gods, these mediators are themselves
polluted? And if they cannot confer this benefit on men, what
good can their friendly mediation do? Or shall its result be, not
that men find entrance to the gods, but that men and demons abide
together in a state of pollution, and consequently of exclusion
from blessedness? Unless, perhaps, some one may say that, like
sponges or things of that sort, the demons themselves, in the
process of cleansing their friends, become themselves the filthier
in proportion as the others become clean. But if this is the
solution, then the gods, who shun contact or intercourse with men
for fear of pollution, mix with demons who are far more polluted.
Or perhaps the gods, who cannot cleanse men without polluting
themselves, can without pollution cleanse the demons who have been
contaminated by human contact? Who can believe such follies,
unless the demons have practised their deceit upon him? If seeing
and being seen is contamination, and if the gods, whom Apuleius
himself calls visible, “the brilliant lights of the world,”353 and the
other stars, are seen by men, are we to believe that the demons,
who cannot be seen unless they please, are safer from
contamination? Or if it is only the seeing and not the being seen
which contaminates, then they must deny that these gods of theirs,
these brilliant lights of the world, see men when their rays beam
upon the earth. Their rays are not contaminated by lighting on
all manner of pollution, and are we to suppose that the gods would
be contaminated if they mixed with men, and even if contact were
needed in order to assist them? For there is contact between the
earth and the sun’s or moon’s rays, and yet this does not
pollute the light.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|