Chapter XXII.
74. Moreover, a certain strength and vigour in walking along the path of wisdom ties in good morals, which are made to extend as far as to purification and singleness of heart,—a subject on which He has now been speaking long, and thus concludes: “Therefore all good453
| 453 Bona; the Vulgate does not contain it.
|
things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the
law and the
prophets.” In the
Greek copies we find the passage runs thus: “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.” But I think the word “good” has been added by the Latins to make the sentence clear. For the thought occurred, that if any one should wish something
wicked to be done to him, and should
refer this clause to that,—as, for instance, if one should wish to be challenged to drink immoderately, and to get drunk over his
cups, and should first do this to the party by whom he wishes it to be done to himself,—it would be ridiculous to
imagine that he had fulfilled this clause. Inasmuch, therefore, as they were influenced by this consideration, as I suppose, one word was added to make the matter clear; so that in the statement, “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men
should do to you,” there was inserted the word “good.” But if this is wanting in the
Greek copies, they also ought to be corrected: but who would venture to do this? It is to be understood, therefore, that the clause is complete and altogether
perfect, even if this word be not added. For the expression used, “whatsoever ye would,” ought to be understood as used not in a customary and random, but in a
strict sense. For there is no will except in the good: for in the case of bad and
wicked deeds, desire is strictly spoken of, not will. Not that the Scriptures always speak in a
strict sense; but where it is necessary, they so keep a word to its perfectly
strict meaning, that they do not allow anything else to be understood.
75. Moreover, this precept seems to refer to the love of our neighbour, and not to the love of God also, seeing that in another passage He says that there are two precepts on which “hang all the law and the prophets.” For if He had said, All things whatsoever ye would should be done to you, do ye even so; in this one sentence He would have embraced both those precepts: for it would soon be said that every one wishes that he himself should be loved both by God
and by men; and so, when this precept was given to him, that what he wished done to himself he should himself do, that certainly would be equivalent to the precept that he should love God and men. But when it is said more expressly of men, “Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them,” nothing else seems to be meant than, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.”454
| 454 The nearest approach that any uninspired Jewish teacher came to the Golden Rule—the designation by which these words are known—was the saying of Hillel, “What is unpleasant to thyself, do not to thy neighbour. This is the whole law, and all the rest is commentary upon it.” Beautiful as the saying is, it falls behind Christ’s words, because it is merely negative, while they are a positive requirement. The Stoics and the Chinese ethics also have a similar
negative precept. It is strange that the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (i. 2) gives the negative form, and not the positive precept. Augustin says we ought to be glad when writers before Christ spoke things in the Gospel (En. in Ps. cxl. 6).
|
But we must carefully attend to what He has added here: “for this is the
law and the
prophets.” Now, in the case of these two
precepts, He not merely says, The
law and the
prophets hang; but He has also added, “all the
law and the
prophets,”
455
which is the same as the whole of
prophecy: and in not making the same addition here, He has kept a place for the other
precept, which refers to the
love of
God. Here, then, inasmuch as He is following out the
precepts with respect to a single
heart, and it is to be dreaded lest any one should have a double
heart toward those from whom the
heart can be hid,
i.e. toward men, a
precept with respect to that very thing was to be given. For there is almost nobody that
would wish that any one of double
heart should have dealings with himself. But no one can bestow anything upon a fellowman with a single
heart, unless he so bestow it that he expects no temporal
advantage from him, and does it with the intention which we have sufficiently discussed above, when we were speaking of the single
eye.
76. The eye, therefore, being cleansed and rendered single, will be adapted and suited to behold and contemplate its own inner light. For the eye in question is the eye of the heart. Now, such an eye is possessed by him who, in order that his works may be truly good, does not make it the aim of his good works that he should please men; but even if it should turn out that he pleases them, he makes this tend rather to their salvation and to the glory of God, not to
his own empty boasting; nor does he do anything that is good tending to his neighbour’s salvation for the purpose of gaining by it those things that are necessary for getting through this present life; nor does he rashly condemn a man’s intention and wish in that action in which it is not apparent with what intention and wish it has been done; and whatever kindnesses he shows to a man, he shows them with the same intention with which he wishes them shown to himself, viz. as not expecting
any temporal advantage from him: thus will the heart be single and pure in which God is sought. “Blessed,” therefore, “are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.”456
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
