Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| The Wickedness of Decius and Gallus. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter
I.—The Wickedness of Decius and
Gallus.
When Decius had reigned not quite two years,2161
2161 Decius reigned about thirty months, from the summer of 249 until
almost the close of the year 251 (see Tillemont, Hist. des Emp.
III. p. 285). His son Herennius Etruscus was slain with his father in a
battle fought against the Goths in Thrace; another son, Hostilianus,
was associated in the purple with Decius’ successor, Gallus, but
died soon afterwards, probably by the plague, which was at that time
raging; possibly, as was suspected, by the treachery of Gallus. There
has been some controversy as to whether Hostilianus was a son, or only
a nephew, or a son-in-law of Decius. Eusebius in speaking of more than
one son becomes an independent witness to the former alternative, and
there is really little reason to doubt it, for Zosimus’
statements are explicit (see Zosimus, I. 25, and cf. Tillemont,
ibid. p. 506). Two other sons are mentioned in one inscription
but its genuineness is doubtful. Eusebius, however, may be urged as a
witness that he had more than two (cf. Tillemont,
ibid.). |
he was slain with his children, and Gallus succeeded him. At this time
Origen died, being sixty-nine years of age.2162
2162 ἑνὸς
δέοντα τῆς
ζωῆς
ἑβδομήκοντα
ἀποπλήσας
žτη
τελευτŽ.
Upon the date of Origen’s birth and upon his life in general, see
above, Bk. VI. chap. 2, note 1, and below, p. 391 sq. |
Dionysius, writing to Hermammon,2163
2163 Of this Hermammon we know nothing. The words of Eusebius at the
close of chap. 22, below, lead us to think that he was probably a
bishop of some church in Egypt. Fragments of the epistle addressed to
him are preserved in this chapter and in chapters 10 and 23, below. It
is possible that Dionysius wrote more than one epistle to Hermammon and
that the fragments which we have are from different letters. This,
however, is not probable, for Eusebius gives no hint that he is quoting
from more than one epistle, and, moreover, the three extracts which we
have correspond excellently with one another, seeming to be drawn from
a single epistle which contained a description of the conduct of
successive emperors toward the Christians. The date of the epistle is
given at the close of chap. 23; namely, the ninth year of the Emperor
Gallienus (i.e. August, 261–August, 262), reckoning from the time
of his association with his father Valerian in the purple. | speaks as
follows of Gallus:2164
2164 Gallus succeeded Decius toward the close of the year 251 and
reigned until the summer of 253 (some with less ground say 254), when
he was slain, with his son, by his own soldiers. His persecution of the
Christians (under him, for instance, Cornelius, bishop of Rome, was
banished, see above, Bk. VI. chap. 39, note 3), seems to have been less
the result of a deeply rooted religious conviction and a fixed
political principle (such as Decius possessed) than of the terrible
plague which had begun during the reign of Decius and was ravaging the
empire during the early part of Gallus’ reign (see
Tillemont’s Hist. des Emp. III. p. 288). He persecuted,
therefore, not so much as a matter of principle as because he desired
either to appease the populace or to propitiate the Gods, whom he
superstitiously believed, as the people did, to be the authors of the
terrible scourge. |
“Gallus neither recognized
the wickedness of Decius, nor considered what had destroyed him; but
stumbled on the same stone, though it lay before his eyes. For when his
reign was prosperous and affairs were proceeding according to his mind,
he attacked the holy men who were interceding with God for his peace
and welfare. Therefore with them he persecuted also their prayers in
his behalf.” So much concerning him. E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|