Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Section 11 PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
11. These things,
since they are asserted upon the warrant of the Prophetical Scriptures,
may possibly silence the Jews, infidel and incredulous though they be.
But the Pagans are wont to ridicule us when they hear us speak of a
Virgin-birth. We must, therefore, say a few words in reply to their
cavils. Every birth, I suppose, depends upon three conditions. There
must be a woman of mature age, she must have intercourse with a man,
her womb must not be barren. Of these three conditions, in the birth of
which we are speaking, one was wanting, the man. And this, forasmuch as
He of Whose birth we speak was not an earthly but a heavenly man, was
supplied by the Heavenly Spirit, the virginity of the mother being
preserved inviolate. And yet why should it be thought marvellous for a
virgin to conceive, when it is well known that the Eastern bird, which
they call the Phœnix, is in such wise born, or born again, without
the intervention of a mate, that it remains continually one, and
continually by being born or born again succeeds itself?3282
3282 The fable of the Phœnix was very generally believed in the
ancient Church, and was used as an illustration both of the
Virgin-birth, as here, and of the Resurrection. Cyril of Jerusalem
(xviii. 8), whom Rufinus evidently had in view, refers to it as a
providentially designed confirmation of the latter. Possibly the
Septuagint translation of Ps. xcii. 12, “The
righteous shall flourish as a palm tree,” ὡς φοίνιξ may have been thought to sanction the fable. On the
Literature connected with the Phœnix, see Bp. Jacobson’s
edition or the Apostolical Fathers, Clemens Romanus, Ep. i. §25,
note, p. 104. | That bees know no wedlock, and no
bringing forth of young, is notorious. There are also other things
which are found to be subject to some such law of birth. Shall it be
thought incredible, then, that was done by divine power, for the
renewal and restoration of the whole world, of which instances
are observed in
the nativity of animals? And yet it is strange that the Gentiles should
think this impossible, who believe their own Minerva to have been born
from the brain of Jupiter. What is more difficult to believe, or what
more contrary to nature? Here, there is a woman, the order of nature is
kept, there is conception, and in due time birth; there, there is no
female, but a man alone, and—birth! Why does he who believes the
one marvel at the other? Again, they say that Father Bacchus was born
from Jupiter’s thigh. Here is another portent, yet it is
believed. Venus also, whom they call Aphrodite, was born, they believe,
of the foam of the sea, as her compounded name shews. They affirm that
Castor and Pollux were born of an egg, the Myrmidons of ants. There are
a thousand other things which, though contrary to nature, find credit
with them, such as the stones thrown by Deucalion and Pyrrha, and the
crop of men sprung from thence. And when they believe such myths and so
many of them, does one thing seem impossible to them, that a woman of
mature age, not defiled by man but impregnated by the Holy Ghost,
should conceive a divine progeny? who, forsooth, if they are hard of
belief, ought in no wise to have given credence to those prodigies,
being, as they are, so many and so degrading; but if they do believe
them, they ought much more readily to receive these beliefs of ours, so
honourable and so holy, than theirs so discreditable and so
vile.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|