Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Violent and Uncanonical Intrusion of Gregory. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
§2. Violent and Uncanonical Intrusion of Gregory.
Now the outrages which have been committed
against us and against the Church are these. While we were holding our
assemblies in peace, as usual, and while the people were rejoicing in
them, and advancing in godly conversation, and while our
fellow-ministers in Egypt, and the Thebais, and Libya, were in love and
peace both with one another and with us; on a sudden the Prefect of
Egypt puts forth a public letter, bearing the form of an edict, and
declaring that one Gregory from Cappadocia was coming to be my
successor from the court. This announcement confounded every one, for
such a proceeding was entirely novel, and now heard of for the first
time. The people however assembled still more constantly in the
churches450
450 Assembling in the Churches seems to have been a sort of protest or
demonstration, sometimes peaceably, but sometimes in a more
exceptionable manner;—peaceably, during Justina’s
persecution at Milan, Ambros. Ep. i. 20. August. Confess. ix.
15, but at Ephesus after the third Ecumenical Council the Metropolitan
shut up the Churches, took possession of the Cathedral, and succeeded
in repelling the imperial troops. Churches were asylums, vid. Cod.
Theodos. ix. 45. §4. &c.; at the same time arms were
prohibited. | , for they very well knew that neither
they themselves, nor any Bishop or Presbyter, nor in short any one had
ever complained against me; and they saw that Arians only were on his
side, and were aware also that he was himself an Arian, and was sent by
Eusebius and his fellows to the Arian party. For you know, brethren,
that Eusebius and his fellows have always been the supporters and
associates of the impious heresy of the Arian madmen451
451 ἀρειομανιτῶν, vid. note on de Syn. 13. | ,
by whose means they have ever carried on their designs against me, and
were the authors of my banishment into Gaul.
The people, therefore, were justly indignant and
exclaimed against the proceeding, calling the rest of the magistrates
and the whole city to witness, that this novel and iniquitous attempt
was now made against the Church, not on the ground of any charge
brought against me by ecclesiastical persons, but through the wanton
assault of the Arian heretics. For even if there had been any complaint
generally prevailing against me, it was not an Arian, or one professing
Arian doctrines, that ought to have been chosen to supersede me; but
according to the ecclesiastical Canons, and the direction of Paul, when
the people were ‘gathered together, and the spirit’ of them
that ordain, ‘with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ452 ’ all things ought to have been enquired
into and transacted canonically, in the presence of those among the
laity and clergy who demanded the change; and not that a person brought
from a distance by Arians, as if making a traffic of the title of
Bishop, should with the patronage and strong arm of heathen
magistrates, thrust himself upon those who neither asked for nor
desired his presence, nor indeed knew anything of what had been done.
Such proceedings tend to the dissolution of all the ecclesiastical
Canons, and compel the heathen to blaspheme, and to suspect that our
appointments are not made according to a divine rule, but as a result
of traffic and patronage453 .E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|