Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter IV. As it has been shown that he who injures another for the sake of his own advantage will undergo terrible punishment at the hand of his own conscience, it is referred that nothing is useful to one which is not in the same way useful to all. Thus there is no place among Christians for the question propounded by the philosophers about two shipwrecked persons, for they must show love and humility to all. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter IV.
As it has been shown that he who injures another for the
sake of his own advantage will undergo terrible punishment at the hand
of his own conscience, it is referred that nothing is useful to one
which is not in the same way useful to all. Thus there is no
place among Christians for the question propounded by the philosophers
about two shipwrecked persons, for they must show love and humility to
all.
24. Hence we
infer625
625 Cic. de
Off. III. 5, § 25. | that a man who guides himself according to
the ruling of nature, so as to be obedient to her, can never injure
another. If he injures another, he violates nature, nor will he
think that what he has gained is so much an advantage as a
disadvantage. And what punishment is worse than the wounds of the
conscience within? What judgment harder than that of our hearts,
whereby each one stands convicted and accuses himself of the injury
that he has wrongfully done against his brother? This the
Scriptures speak of very plainly, saying: “Out of the mouth
of fools there is a rod for wrong-doing.”626 Folly, then, is condemned because it
causes wrong-doing. Ought we not rather to avoid this, than
death, or loss, or want, or exile, or sickness? Who would not
think some blemish of body or loss of inheritance far less than some
blemish of soul or loss of reputation?
25. It is clear, then,627 that all must consider and hold that the
advantage of the individual is the same as that of all, and that
nothing must be considered advantageous except what is for the general
good. For how can one be benefited alone? That which is
useless to all is harmful. I certainly cannot think that he who
is useless to all can be of use to himself. For if there is one
law of nature for all, there is also one state of usefulness for
all. And we are bound by the law of nature to act for the good of
all. It is not, therefore, right for him who wishes the interests
of another to be considered according to nature, to injure him against
the law of nature.
26. For if those who run in a race628
628 Cic. de
Off. III. 10, § 42. | are, as one hears, instructed and warned
each one to win the race by swiftness of foot and not by any foul play,
and to hasten on to victory by running as hard as they can, but not to
dare to trip up another or push him aside with their hand, how much
more in the course of this life ought the victory to be won by us,
without falseness to another and cheating?
27. Some ask629
629 Cic. de
Off. 23, § 89. |
whether a wise man ought in case of a shipwreck to take away a plank
from an ignorant sailor? Although it seems better for the common
good that a wise man rather than a fool should escape from shipwreck,
yet I do not think that a Christian, a just and a wise man, ought to
save his own life by the death of another; just as when he meets with
an armed robber he cannot return his blows, lest in defending his life
he should stain his love toward his neighbour. The verdict on
this is plain and clear in the books of the Gospel. “Put up
thy sword, for every one that taketh the sword shall perish with the
sword.”630 What robber
is more hateful than the persecutor who came to kill Christ? But
Christ would
not be defended
from the wounds of the persecutor, for He willed to heal all by His
wounds.
28. Why dost thou consider thyself greater than
another, when a Christian man ought to put others before himself, to
claim nothing for himself, usurp no honours, claim no reward for his
merits? Why, next, art thou not wont to bear thy own troubles
rather than to destroy another’s advantage? For what is so
contrary to nature as not to be content with what one has or to seek
what is another’s, and to try to get it in shameful ways.
For if a virtuous life is in accordance with nature—for God made
all things very good—then shameful living must be opposed to
it. A virtuous and a shameful life cannot go together, since they
are absolutely severed by the law of nature. E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|