Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| St. Luke's Gospel, Selected by Marcion as His Authority, and Mutilated by Him. The Other Gospels Equally Authoritative. Marcion's Terms of Discussion, However, Accepted, and Grappled with on the Footing of St. Luke's Gospel Alone. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter II.—St.
Luke’s Gospel, Selected by Marcion as His Authority, and
Mutilated by Him. The Other Gospels Equally Authoritative.
Marcion’s Terms of Discussion, However, Accepted, and Grappled
with on the Footing of St. Luke’s Gospel Alone.
You have now our answer to the Antitheses
compendiously indicated by us.3516 I pass on to give a
proof of the Gospel3517
3517 [The term εὐαγγέλιον
was often employed for a written book, says Kaye (p. 298), who
refers to Book i. cap. 1. supra, etc.] | —not, to be
sure, of Jewry, but of Pontus—having become meanwhile3518
3518 Interim, perhaps
“occasionally.” | adulterated; and this shall
indicate3519 the order by which
we proceed. We lay it down as our first position, that the evangelical
Testament3520
3520 Instrumentum.
[See cap. 1, supra. And, above, note 9. Also in cap. iii. and
the Apology, (cap. xlvii.) he calls the Testaments, Digests,
or Sancta Digesta.] | has apostles for
its authors,3521
3521 By this canon of his,
that the true Gospels must have for their authors either apostles or
companions and disciples of apostles, he shuts out the false Gospels of
the heretics, such as the Ebionites, Encratites, Nazarenes, and
Marcionites (Le Prieur). | to whom was
assigned by the Lord Himself this office of publishing the gospel.
Since, however, there are apostolic3522
3522 Apostolicos,
companions of the apostles associated in the authorship. | men
also,3523
3523 He means, of course,
St. Mark and St. Luke. | they are yet not alone, but appear with
apostles and after apostles; because the preaching of disciples might
be open to the suspicion of an affectation of glory, if there did not
accompany it3524 the authority of
the masters, which means that of Christ,3525
for it was that which made the apostles their masters. Of the apostles,
therefore, John and Matthew first instil3526
faith into us; whilst of apostolic men, Luke and Mark renew it
afterwards.3527 These all start
with the same principles of the faith,3528 so
far as relates to the one only God the Creator and His Christ, how that
He was born of the Virgin, and came to fulfil3529
the law and the prophets. Never mind3530 if there does
occur some variation in the order of their narratives, provided that
there be agreement in the essential matter3531 of
the faith, in which there is disagreement with Marcion. Marcion, on the
other hand, you must know,3532 ascribes no author
to his Gospel, as if it could not be allowed him to affix a title to
that from which it was no crime (in his eyes) to subvert3533 the very body. And here I might now make a
stand, and contend that a work ought not to be recognised, which holds
not its head erect, which exhibits no consistency, which gives no
promise of credibility from the fulness of its title and the just
profession of its author. But we prefer to join issue3534 on every point; nor shall we leave
unnoticed3535 what may fairly be
understood to be on our side.3536 Now, of the authors
whom we possess, Marcion seems to have singled out Luke3537
3537 Compare
Irenæus, Adversus Hæreses (Harvey), i. 25 and iii. 11;
also Epiphanius, Hær. xlii. See also the editor’s
notes on the passages in Irenæus, who quotes other authorities
also, and shows the particulars of Marcion’s mutilations.
[Vol. I. 429.] | for his mutilating process.3538 Luke, however, was not an apostle, but only
an apostolic man; not a master, but a disciple, and so inferior to a
master—at least as far subsequent to3539
him as the apostle whom he followed (and that, no doubt, was
Paul3540
3540 See Hieronymi,
Catal. Scriptt. Eccles. 7, and Fabricius’
notes. | ) was subsequent to the others; so that, had
Marcion even published his Gospel in the name of St. Paul himself, the
single authority of the document,3541 destitute of
all support from preceding authorities, would not be a sufficient basis
for our faith. There would be still wanted that Gospel which St. Paul
found in existence, to which he yielded his belief, and with which he so
earnestly wished his own to agree, that he actually on that account
went up to Jerusalem to know and consult the apostles, “lest he
should run, or had been running in vain;”3542 in
other words, that the faith which he had learned, and the gospel which
he was preaching, might be in accordance with theirs. Then, at last,
having conferred with the (primitive) authors, and having agreed with
them touching the rule of faith, they joined their hands in fellowship,
and divided their labours thenceforth in the office of preaching the
gospel, so that they were to go to the Jews, and St. Paul to the Jews
and the Gentiles. Inasmuch, therefore, as the enlightener of St.
Luke himself desired the authority of his predecessors for both his own
faith and preaching, how much more may not I require for Luke’s
Gospel that which was necessary for the Gospel of his master.3543
3543 [Dr. Holmes not
uniformly, yet constantly inserts the prefix St. before the name of
Paul, and brackets it, greatly disfiguring the page. It is not in
our author’s text, but I venture to dispense with the
ever-recurring brackets.] | E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|