Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Of the Revolution of the Ages, Which Some Philosophers Believe Will Bring All Things Round Again, After a Certain Fixed Cycle, to the Same Order and Form as at First. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter 13.—Of the Revolution of
the Ages, Which Some Philosophers Believe Will Bring All Things
Round Again, After a Certain Fixed Cycle, to the Same Order and
Form as at First.
This controversy some philosophers
have seen no other approved means of solving than by introducing
cycles of time, in which there should be a constant renewal and
repetition of the order of nature;543
543 Antoninus says (ii. 14): “All
things from eternity are of like forms, and come round in a
circle.” Cf. also ix. 28, and the references to more ancient
philosophical writers in Gataker’s notes in these
passages. | and they have therefore asserted
that these cycles will ceaselessly recur, one passing away and
another coming, though they are not agreed as to whether one
permanent world shall pass through all these cycles, or whether the
world shall at fixed intervals die out, and be renewed so as to
exhibit a recurrence of the same phenomena—the things which have
been, and those which are to be, coinciding. And from this
fantastic vicissitude they exempt not even the immortal soul that
has attained wisdom, consigning it to a ceaseless transmigration
between delusive blessedness and real misery. For how can that be
truly called blessed which has no assurance of being so eternally,
and is either in ignorance of the truth, and blind to the misery
that is approaching, or, knowing it, is in misery and fear? Or if
it passes to bliss, and leaves miseries forever, then there happens
in time a new thing which time shall not end. Why not, then, the
world also? Why may not man, too, be a similar thing? So that,
by following the straight path of sound doctrine, we escape, I know
not what circuitous paths, discovered by deceiving and deceived
sages.
Some, too, in advocating these
recurring cycles that restore all things to their original cite in
favor of their supposition what Solomon says in the book of
Ecclesiastes: “What is that which hath been? It is that which
shall be. And what is that which is done? It is that which
shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Who can
speak and say, See, this is new? It hath been already of old
time, which was before us.”544 This he said either of those
things of which he had just been speaking—the succession of
generations, the orbit of the sun, the course of rivers,—or else
of all kinds of creatures that are born and die. For men were
before us, are with us, and shall be after us; and so all living
things and all plants. Even monstrous and irregular productions,
though differing from one another, and though some are reported as
solitary instances, yet resemble one another generally, in so far
as they are miraculous and monstrous, and, in this sense, have
been, and shall be, and are no new and recent things under the
sun. However, some would understand these words as meaning that
in the predestination of God all things have already existed, and
that thus there is no new thing under the sun. At all events, far
be it from any true believer to suppose that by these words of
Solomon those cycles are meant, in which, according to those
philosophers, the same periods and events of time are repeated; as
if, for example, the philosopher Plato, having taught in the school
at Athens which is called the Academy, so, numberless ages before,
at long but certain intervals, this same Plato and the same school,
and the same disciples existed, and so also are to be repeated
during the countless cycles that are yet to be,—far be it, I say,
from us to believe this. For once Christ died for our sins; and,
rising from the dead, He dieth no more. “Death hath no more
dominion over Him;545 and we ourselves after the
resurrection shall be “ever with the Lord,”546 to whom we now say, as the sacred
Psalmist dictates, “Thou shall keep us, O Lord, Thou shall
preserve us from this generation.”547 And that too which follows, is, I
think, appropriate enough: “The wicked walk in a
circle,” not because their life is to recur by means of these
circles, which these philosophers imagine, but because the path in
which their false doctrine now runs is circuitous.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|