data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16dbb/16dbb649aaa25d1bb0206088712fde8078750e77" alt=""
Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Whether We are to Believe that God, as He Has Always Been Sovereign Lord, Has Always Had Creatures Over Whom He Exercised His Sovereignty; And in What Sense We Can Say that the Creature Has Always Been, and Yet Cannot Say It is Co-Eternal. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter 15.—Whether We are to
Believe that God, as He Has Always Been Sovereign Lord, Has Always
Had Creatures Over Whom He Exercised His Sovereignty; And in What
Sense We Can Say that the Creature Has Always Been, and Yet Cannot
Say It is Co-Eternal.
For my own part, indeed, as I dare
not say that there ever was a time when the Lord God was not
Lord,548 so I ought
not to doubt that man had no existence before time, and was first
created in time. But when I consider what God could be the Lord
of, if there was not always some creature, I shrink from making any
assertion, remembering my own insignificance, and that it is
written, “What man is he that can know the counsel of God? or who
can think what the will of the Lord is? For the thoughts of
mortal men are timid, and our devices are but uncertain. For the
corruptible body presseth down the soul, and the earthly tabernacle
weigheth down the mind that museth upon many things.”549 Many
things certainly do I muse upon in this earthly tabernacle, because
the one thing which is true among the many, or beyond the many, I
cannot find. If, then, among these many thoughts, I say that
there have always been creatures for Him to be Lord of, who is
always and ever has been Lord, but that these creatures have not
always been the same, but succeeded one another (for we would not
seem to say that any is co-eternal with the Creator, an assertion
condemned equally by faith and sound reason), I must take care lest
I fall into the absurd and ignorant error of maintaining that by
these successions and changes mortal creatures have always existed,
whereas the immortal creatures had not begun to exist until the
date of our own world, when the angels were created; if at least
the angels are intended by that light which was first made, or,
rather, by that heaven of which it is said, “In the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth.”550 The angels, at least did not
exist before they were created; for if we say that they have always
existed, we shall seem to make them co-eternal with the Creator.
Again, if I say that the angels were not created in time, but
existed before all times, as those over whom God, who has ever been
Sovereign, exercised His sovereignty, then I shall be asked
whether, if they were created before all time, they, being
creatures, could possibly always exist. It may perhaps be
replied, Why not always, since that which is in all time may
very properly be said to be “always?” Now so true is it that
these angels have existed in all time that even before time was
they were created; if at least time began with the heavens, and the
angels existed before the heavens. And if time was even before
the heavenly bodies, not indeed marked by hours, days, months, and
years,—for these measures of time’s periods which are commonly
and properly called times, did manifestly begin with the motion of
the heavenly bodies, and so God said, when He appointed them,
“Let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and for
years,”551 —if, I say,
time was before these heavenly bodies by some changing movement,
whose parts succeeded one another and could not exist
simultaneously, and if there was some such movement among the
angels which necessitated the existence of time, and that they from
their very creation should be subject to these temporal changes,
then they have
existed in all time, for time
came into being along with them. And who will say that what was
in all time, was not always?
But if I make such a reply, it will
be said to me, How, then, are they not co-eternal with the Creator,
if He and they always have been? How even can they be said to
have been created, if we are to understand that they have always
existed? What shall we reply to this? Shall we say that both
statements are true? that they always have been, since they have
been in all time, they being created along with time, or time along
with them, and yet that also they were created? For, similarly,
we will not deny that time itself was created, though no one doubts
that time has been in all time; for if it has not been in all time,
then there was a time when there was no time. But the most
foolish person could not make such an assertion. For we can
reasonably say there was a time when Rome was not; there was a time
when Jerusalem was not; there was a time when Abraham was not;
there was a time when man was not, and so on: in fine, if the
world was not made at the commencement of time, but after some time
had elapsed, we can say there was a time when the world was not.
But to say there was a time when time was not, is as absurd as to
say there was a man when there was no man; or, this world was when
this world was not. For if we are not referring to the same
object, the form of expression may be used, as, there was another
man when this man was not. Thus we can reasonably say there was
another time when this time was not; but not the merest simpleton
could say there was a time when there was no time. As, then, we
say that time was created, though we also say that it always has
been, since in all time time has been, so it does not follow that
if the angels have always been, they were therefore not created.
For we say that they have always been, because they have been in
all time; and we say they have been in all time, because time
itself could no wise be without them. For where there is no
creature whose changing movements admit of succession, there cannot
be time at all. And consequently, even if they have always
existed, they were created; neither, if they have always existed,
are they therefore co-eternal with the Creator. For He has always
existed in unchangeable eternity; while they were created, and are
said to have been always, because they have been in all time, time
being impossible without the creature. But time passing away by
its changefulness, cannot be co-eternal with changeless eternity.
And consequently, though the immortality of the angels does not
pass in time, does not become past as if now it were not, nor has a
future as if it were not yet, still their movements, which are the
basis of time, do pass from future to past; and therefore they
cannot be co-eternal with the Creator, in whose movement we cannot
say that there has been that which now is not, or shall be that
which is not yet. Wherefore, if God always has been Lord, He has
always had creatures under His dominion,—creatures, however, not
begotten of Him, but created by Him out of nothing; nor co-eternal
with Him, for He was before them though at no time without them,
because He preceded them, not by the lapse of time, but by His
abiding eternity. But if I make this reply to those who demand
how He was always Creator, always Lord, if there were not always a
subject creation; or how this was created, and not rather
co-eternal with its Creator, if it always was, I fear I may be
accused of recklessly affirming what I know not, instead of
teaching what I know. I return, therefore, to that which our
Creator has seen fit that we should know; and those things which He
has allowed the abler men to know in this life, or has reserved to
be known in the next by the perfected saints, I acknowledge to be
beyond my capacity. But I have thought it right to discuss these
matters without making positive assertions, that they who read may
be warned to abstain from hazardous questions, and may not deem
themselves fit for everything. Let them rather endeavor to obey
the wholesome injunction of the apostle, when he says, “For I
say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among
you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think;
but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the
measure of faith.”552 For if an infant receive
nourishment suited to its strength, it becomes capable, as it
grows, of taking more; but if its strength and capacity be
overtaxed, it dwines away in place of growing.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|