Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Preface.--It is useless to attempt to benefit those who will not accept help. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Book I.57
57 This
first Book against Eunomius was not in the 1st Paris Edition
of Gregory’s works, 1615; but it was published three years later
from the ‘Bavarian Codex,’ i.e. that of Munich, by J.
Gretser, in an Appendix, along with the Summaries (i.e. the headings of
the sections, which appear to be not Gregory’s) and the two
Introductory Letters. These Summaries and the Letters, and nearly three
quarters of the 1st Book were found in J. Livineius’
transcript from the Codex Vaticanus made 1579, at Rome. This Appendix
was added to the 2nd Paris Edit. 1638. F. Oehler, whose text
has been followed throughout, has used for the 1st Book the
Munich Codex (on paper, xvith Cent.); the Venetian (on
cotton, xiiith Cent.); the Turin (on cotton,
xivth Cent.), and the oldest of all, the Florentine (on
parchment, xith Cent.). |
§1. Preface.—It is
useless to attempt to benefit those who will not accept
help.
It seems that the wish to
benefit all, and to lavish indiscriminately upon the first comer
one’s own gifts, was not a thing altogether commendable, or even
free from reproach in the eyes of the many; seeing that the gratuitous
waste of many prepared drugs on the incurably-diseased produces no
result worth caring about, either in the way of gain to the recipient,
or reputation to the would-be benefactor. Rather such an attempt
becomes in many cases the occasion of a change for the worse. The
hopelessly-diseased and now dying patient receives only a speedier end
from the more active medicines; the fierce unreasonable temper is only
made worse by the kindness of the lavished pearls, as the Gospel tells
us. I think it best, therefore, in accordance with the Divine command,
for any one to separate the valuable from the worthless when either
have to be given away, and to avoid the pain which a generous giver
must receive from one who ‘treads upon his pearl,’ and
insults him by his utter want of feeling for its beauty.
This thought suggests itself
when I think of one who freely communicated to others the beauties of
his own soul, I mean that man of God, that mouth of piety, Basil; one
who from the abundance of his spiritual treasures poured his grace of
wisdom into evil souls whom he had never tested, and into one among
them, Eunomius, who was perfectly insensible to all the efforts made
for his good. Pitiable indeed seemed the condition of this poor man,
from the extreme weakness of his soul in the matter of the Faith, to
all true members of the Church; for who is so wanting in feeling as not
to pity, at least, a perishing soul? But Basil alone, from the
abiding58
58 Reading,—
τὸ
μόνιμον…ἐπιτολμῶντα. This is the correction of Oehler for τὸν
μόνον…ἐπιτολμῶν which the text presents. The Venetian ms. has ἐπιτολμῶντι | ardour of his love, was moved to undertake his
cure, and therein to attempt impossibilities; he alone took so much to
heart the man’s desperate condition, as to compose, as an
antidote of deadly poisons, his refutation of this heresy59
59 his
refutation of this heresy. This is
Basil’s ᾽Ανατρεπτικὸς
τοῦ
ἀπολογητικοῦ
τοῦ
δυοσεβοῦς
Εὐνομίου. ‘Basil,’ says Photius, ‘with difficulty got
hold of Eunomius’ book,’ perhaps because it was written
originally for a small circle of readers, and was in a highly
scientific form. What happened next may be told in the words of
Claudius Morellius (Prolegomena to Paris Edition of 1615): ‘When
Basil’s first essay against the fœtus of Eunomius had been
published, he raised his bruised head like a trodden worm, seized his
pen, and began to rave more poisonously still as well against Basil as
the orthodox faith.’ This was Eunomius’ ‘Apologia
Apologiæ:’ of it Photius says, ‘His reply to Basil was
composed for many Olympiads while shut up in his cell. This, like
another Saturn, he concealed from the eyes of Basil till it had grown
up, i.e. he concealed it, by devouring it, as long as Basil
lived.’ He then goes on to say that after Basil’s death,
Theodore (of Mopsuestia), Gregory of Nyssa, and Sophronius found it and
dealt with it, though even then Eunomius had only ventured to show it
to some of his friends. Philostorgius, the ardent admirer of Eunomius,
makes the amazing statement that Basil died of despair after reading
it. | , which aimed at saving its author, and
restoring him to the Church.
He, on the contrary, like one
beside himself with fury, resists his doctor; he fights and struggles;
he regards as a bitter foe one who only put forth his strength to drag
him from the abyss of misbelief; and he does not indulge in this
foolish anger only before chance hearers now and then; he has raised
against himself a literary monument to record this blackness of his
bile; and when in long years he got the requisite amount of leisure, he
was travailling over his work during all that interval with mightier
pangs than those of the largest and the bulkiest beasts; his threats of
what was coming were dreadful, whilst he was still secretly moulding
his conception: but when at last and with great difficulty he brought
it to the light, it was a poor little abortion, quite prematurely born.
However, those who share his ruin nurse it and coddle it; while we,
seeking the blessing in the prophet (“Blessed shall he be who
shall take thy children, and shall dash them against the stones60 ”) are only eager, now that it has got
into our hands, to take this puling manifesto and dash it on the rock,
as if it was one of the children of Babylon; and the rock must be
Christ; in other words, the enunciation of the truth. Only may that
power come upon us which strengthens weakness, through the prayers of
him who made his own strength perfect in bodily weakness61
61 ‘He
asks for the intercession of Saint Paul’ (Paris Edit. in
marg.). | .E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|