Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Introduction. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Introduction.
Twelve names of the Son of God are recounted, being
distributed into three classes. These names are so many proofs of
the eternity not only of the Son, but of the Father also.
Furthermore, they are compared with the twelve stones in the High
Priest’s breastplate, and their inseparability is shown by a new
distribution of them. Returning to the comparison with the High
Priest’s breastplate, the writer sets forth the beauty of the
woven-work and the precious stones of the mystic raiment, and the
hidden meaning of that division into woven-work and precious stones,
which being done, he expounds the comparison drawn by him, showing that
faith must be woven in with works, and adds a short summary of the same
faith, as concerning the Son.
1. Enough hath been
said, as I think, your sacred Majesty, in the book preceding to show
that the Son of God is an eternal being, not diverse from the Father,
begotten, not created: we have also proved, from passages of the
Scriptures, that God’s true Son is God,1894
1894 or “that
God’s Son is true God.” “very God.” | and is declared so to be by the evident
tokens of His Majesty.
2. Wherefore, albeit what hath already been
set forth is plentiful even to overflowing for maintaining the
Faith—seeing that the greatness of a river is mostly judged of
from the manner in which its springs rise and flow forth—still,
to the end that our belief may be the plainer to sight, the waters of
our spring ought, methinks, to be parted off into three channels.
There are, then, firstly, plain tokens declaring essential inherence in
the Godhead; secondly, the expressions of the likeness of the Father
and the Son; and lastly, those of the undoubtable unity of the Divine
Majesty. Now of the first sort are the names
“begetting,” “God,” “Son,”
“The Word;”1895
1895 Bible:Rom.1.3-Rom.1.4 Bible:John.1.1-John.1.3 Bible:John.1.14">S. John i. 14, 18; Heb. i. 5; Rom. ix.
5; i. 3–4; S. John i. 1–3, 14. | of the second,
“brightness,” “expression,”
“mirror,” “image;”1896
1896 Heb. i. 3; S. John xiv. 9; Col. i. 15. | and of the third, “wisdom,”
“power,” “truth,” “life.”1897
1897 1 Cor. i. 24; S. John xiv. 6; xi. 25. |
3. These tokens so declare the nature of the
Son, that by them you may know both that the Father is eternal, and
that the Son is not diverse from Him; for the source of generation is
He Who is,1898
1898 i.e.,
ὁ ὤν. Ex. iii. 14 (LXX.)—καῒ εἶπεν ὁ
Θεὸς πρὸς
Μωυσῆν, λέγων
᾽Εγώ εἰμι ὁ
῍Ων. Cf. S.
Bible:Rev.4.8">John viii. 58; xviii. 6; Rev.
i. 4, 8; iv. 8. | and as
begotten of the Eternal, He is God; coming forth from the Father, He is
the Son;1899 from God, He
is the Word; He is the radiance of the Father’s glory, the
expression of His substance,1900
1900 Heb. i. 3. ἀπαυγασμα
τῆς δόξης καὶ
χαρακτὴρ τῆς
ὑποστάσεως
αὐτοὑ. ᾽
ἱπόστασις
is rendered “person” in the A.V. The R.V. 1881
has “effulgence of His glory and very image of His
substance,” and in the margin “the impress of His
substance.” The Son does not reproduce the person of
the Father—otherwise there would be no distinction, but
confusion, of Persons, but He does reproduce or represent the
substance, or essence, of the Father—i.e., the
λόγος
τῆς οὐσίας is
the same for both Persons. | the counterpart of
God,1901
1901
“speculum Dei”—lit. “mirror of
God.” | the image of His majesty; the Bounty of Him
Who is bountiful, the Wisdom of Him Who is wise, the Power of the
Mighty One, the Truth of Him Who is true,1902
1902 Jer. x. 10; S. John xiv. 6; xvii. 3; 1 John v.
20. |
the Life of the Living One.1903
1903 Bible:1John.1.2 Bible:1John.5.20">Deut. v. 26; Rom. xiv. 11; S. John xi.
25; v. 26; 1 John i. 2; v. 20. | In
agreement, therefore, stand the attributes of Father and Son, that none
may suppose any diversity, or doubt but that they are of one
Majesty. For each and all of these names would we furnish
examples of their use were we not constrained by a desire to maintain
our discourse within bounds.
4. Of these twelve, as of twelve precious
stones, is the pillar of our faith built up. For these are the
precious stones—sardius, jasper, smaragd, chrysolite, and the
rest,—woven into the robe of holy Aaron,1904
even
of him who bears
the likeness of Christ,1905 that is, of the
true Priest; stones set in gold, and inscribed with the names of the
sons of Israel, twelve stones close joined and fitting one into
another, for if any should sunder or separate them, the whole fabric of
the faith falls in ruins.
5. This, then, is the foundation of our
faith—to know that the Son of God is begotten; if He be not
begotten, neither is He the Son. Nor yet is it sufficient to call
Him Son, unless you shall also distinguish Him as the Only-begotten
Son. If He is a creature, He is not God; if He is not God, He is
not the Life; if He is not the Life, then is He not the Truth.
6. The first three tokens, therefore, that is to
say, the names “generation,” “Son,”
“Only-begotten,” do show that the Son is of God originally
and by virtue of His own nature.
7. The three that follow—to wit, the
names “God,” “Life,” “Truth,”
reveal His Power, whereby He hath laid the foundations of, and upheld,
the created world. “For,” as Paul said, “in Him
we live and move and have our being;”1906
and therefore, in the first three the Son’s natural
right,1907
1907 sc. to the
name and title of God. | in the other
three the unity of action subsisting between Father and Son is made
manifest.
8. The Son of God is also called the
“image” and “effulgence” and
“expression” [of God], for these names have disclosed the
Father’s incomprehensible and unsearchable Majesty dwelling in
the Son, and the expression of His likeness in Him. These three
names, then, as we see, refer to [the Son’s] likeness [to the
Father].1908
1908 See Heb. i. 3. “Splendor” is St.
Ambrose’s rendering of ἀπαύγασμα.
Theodoret says: “The radiance” (or
“effulgence”) “of a fire comes from it and
accompanies it. The fire causes the radiance, but the radiance is
inseparable from the fire. Also the radiance of the fire is of
the same nature with it; so also is the Son of the same nature with the
Father.” Theophylact—“The sun is never seen
without his radiance, and we cannot think of a father without his
child.” Delitzsch—“It is no nimbus around God
that is here called His “glory,” but God’s own
inconceivable, spiritual fire and brightness (die übersinnliche
geistige Feuer und Lichtnatur Gottes selber), which He, in order to
reveal Himself to Himself, makes an object to Himself” (aus
sich heraussetzt). |
9. We have yet the operations of Power,
Wisdom, and Justice left, wherewith, severally, to prove [the
Son’s] eternity.1909
1909 “The act
of knowing and comprehending all things necessarily includes the
expression of mind-work or wisdom, that is, the Word, and without this
it cannot even be conceived of. Rightly, then, did the Fathers
deduce the eternity of the Word from the eternity of the
Father.”—Hurter, ad loc. |
10. This, then, is that robe, adorned with
precious stones; this is the amice of the true Priest; this the bridal
garment; here is the inspired weaver, who well knew how to weave that
work. No common woven work is it, whereof the Lord spake by His
Prophet: “Who gave to women their skill in
weaving?”1910
1910 St. Ambrose’s
rendering of this passage (Job
xxxviii. 36) agrees with the
LXX.—τίς
δὲ ἔδωκε
γυναιξὶν
ὑφάσματος
σοφίαν, ἤ
ποικιλτικὴν
ἐλιστήμην.
The A.V. 1611 has: “Who hath put wisdom in the inward
parts? or who hath given understanding to the heart?” R.V.
has “dark clouds” and “meteor” as marginal
substitutes for “inward parts” and
“heart.” Vulgate—Quis posuit in visceribus
hominis sapientiam? vel quis dedit gallo intelligentiam? | No common
stones again, are they—stones, as we find them called, “of
filling;”1911
1911 Ex. xxxv. 27. καὶ οἱ
ἄρχοντες
ἤνεγκαν τοὺς
λίθους τῆς
σμαράγδου
καί τοὺς
λίθους της
πληρωσεως
εἰς τὴν
ἐπωμίδα καὶ
τὸ
λογεῖον.—
LXX. Lapides onycninos et gemmas ad superhumerale et
rationale.—Vulg. “Stones to be
set.”—A.V. & R.V. The LXX. gives the closest
rendering of the Hebrew. | for all perfection
depends on this
condition,
that there be nought lacking. They are stones joined together and
set in gold—that is, of a spiritual kind; the joining of them by
our minds and their setting in convincing argument. Finally
Scripture teaches us how far from common are these stones, inasmuch as,
whilst some brought one kind, and others another, of less precious
offerings, these the devout princes brought, wearing them upon their
shoulders, and made of them the “breastplate of judgment,”
that is, a piece of woven work. Now we have a woven work, when
faith and action go together.
11. Let none suppose me to be misguided, in
that I made at first a threefold division, each part containing four,
and afterwards a fourfold division, each part containing three
terms. The beauty of a good thing pleases the more, if it be
shown under various aspects. For those are good things, whereof
the texture of the priestly robe was the token, that is to say, either
the Law, or the Church, which latter hath made two garments for her
spouse, as it is written1912
1912 Proverbs
xxxi. 21 (22). St.
Ambrose appears to follow the LXX., whose rendering of the passage is
different from the Vulgate, with which our English versions
agree. With what follows in the text, cf. Ex.
xxviii. 33, 34, also Ex. xxviii. 5, 6. | —the one of
action, the other of spirit, weaving together the threads of faith and
works. Thus, in one place, as we read, she makes a groundwork of
gold, and afterwards weaves thereon blue, and purple, with scarlet, and
white. Again, [as we read] elsewhere, she first makes little
flowerets of blue and other colours, and attaches gold, and there is
made a single priestly robe, to the end that adornments of diverse
grace and beauty, made up of the same bright colours, may gain fresh
glory by diversity of arrangement.
12. Moreover (to complete our interpretation
of these types), it is certain that by refined gold and silver are
designated the oracles of the Lord, whereby our faith stands
firm. “The oracles of the Lord are pure oracles, silver
tried in the fire, refined of dross, purified seven
times.”1913
1913 Ps. xii. (xi. Vulg.) 6, 7. Cf. Prov. xxx.
5. | Now blue
is like the air we breathe and draw in; purple, again, represents the
appearance of water; scarlet signifies fire; and white linen, earth,
for its origin is in the earth.1914
1914 These colours
entered into the fashioning of the High Priest’s Ephod
(Ex. xxviii. 5, 6) and the Vail of the
Tabernacle. Probably a little symbolism was attached to the
ornaments of Ahasuerus’ palace of Susa, “where were white,
green, and blue” (or violet) “hangings fastened with cords
of fine linen and purple to silver rings and pillars of marble:
the beds were of gold and silver upon a pavement of red and blue and
white and black marble.” White and green might represent
the earth, blue the air, purple the sea and water generally, in the
curtains: whilst in the variegated marble pavement, red would
naturally symbolize fire, blue the air, white water (as colourless when
pure), black earth (the soil). Notice “the air we
breathe,” etc.—“Aëris quem spiramus et cujus
carpimus flatum.” Compare Virgil, Æn. I.
387, 388. | Of
these four elements, again, the human body is composed.1915
1915 This was supposed by
some of the Ionic philosophers to be the explanation of
perception. We perceived earth, they supposed, by reason of the
earthly constituent of our organism. |
13. Whether, then, you join to faith already
present in the soul, bodily acts agreeing thereto; or acts come first,
and faith be joined as their companion, presenting them to
God—here is the robe of the minister of religion, here the
priestly vestment.
14. Faith is profitable, therefore, when her
brow is bright with a fair crown of good works.1916 This faith—that I may set the
matter forth shortly—is contained in the following principles,
which cannot be overthrown. If the Son had His origin in nothing,
He is not Son; if He is a creature, He is not the Creator; if He was
made, He did not make all things; if He needs to learn, He hath no
foreknowledge; if He is a receiver, He is not perfect; if He
progress,1917
1917 i.e. if it
is possible for Him to ascend to a higher plane of existence. | He is not
God. If He is unlike (the Father) He is not the (Father’s)
image; if He is Son by grace, He is not such by nature;1918
1918 i.e. He is
a son “by adoption,” as one of ourselves. | if He have no part in the Godhead, He
hath it in Him to sin.1919
1919 i.e.He
may not have as yet actually sinned, but it is within the range
of possibility for Him—He is, as Hurter expresses it in his note,
“auctor malitiæ si non actu, saltem
potentia.” |
“There is none good, but Godhead.”1920
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|