Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter II. Since it has been proved that the Son is true God, and in that is not inferior to the Father, it is shown that by the word solus (alone) when used of the Father in the Scriptures, the Son is not excluded; nay, that this expression befits Him above all, and Him alone. The Trinity is alone, not amongst all, but above all. The Son alone does what the Father does, and alone has immortality. But we must not for this reason separate Him from the Father in our controversies. We may, however, understand that passage of the Incarnation. Lastly the Father is shut out from a share in the redemption of men by those who would have the Son to be separated from Him. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter II.
Since it has been proved that the Son is true God,
and in that is not inferior to the Father, it is shown that by the
word solus (alone) when used of the Father in the
Scriptures, the Son is not excluded; nay, that this expression befits
Him above all, and Him alone. The Trinity is alone, not amongst
all, but above all. The Son alone does what the Father does, and
alone has immortality. But we must not for this reason separate
Him from the Father in our controversies. We may, however,
understand that passage of the Incarnation. Lastly the Father is
shut out from a share in the redemption of men by those who would have
the Son to be separated from Him.
27. We have fully
demonstrated by passages of Scripture, in the earlier books, that
Christ is true, yea, very true God. Therefore if Christ, as it
has been taught, is true God, let us enquire why they desire to
separate the Son from the Father, when they read that the Father is the
only true God.
28. If they
say that the Father alone is true God, they cannot deny that God the
Son alone is the Truth; for Christ is the Truth. Is the Truth
then something inferior to Him that is true, seeing that according to
the use of terms a man is called true from the word
“truth,” as also wise from wisdom, just from justice?
We do not deem it so between the Father and the Son. For there is
nothing wanting to the Father, because the Father is full of truth; and
the Son, because He is the Truth, is equal to Him that is true.
29. But that they may know, when they see
the word “alone,” that the Son is in no wise to be
separated from the Father, let them remember it was said by God in the
Prophets: “I stretched forth the heavens
alone.”2546 The Father
certainly did not stretch them forth without the Son. For the Son
Himself, Who is the Wisdom of God, says: “When He prepared
the heavens I was present with Him.”2547 And Paul declares that it was said
of the Son: “Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the
foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Thy
hands.”2548
2548 Heb. i. 10. Cf. also Ps. cii.
25. | Whether
therefore the Son made the heavens, as also the Apostle would have it
understood, whilst He Himself certainly did not alone spread out the
heavens without the Father; or as it stands in the Book of
Proverbs: “The Lord in wisdom hath founded the earth, in
understanding hath He prepared the heavens;”2549 it is proved that neither the Father made
the heavens alone without the Son, nor yet the Son without the
Father. And yet He who spread out the heavens is said to be
alone.
30. To show indeed how plainly we must
understand the expression “alone” of the Son (although we
may never believe that He did anything without the knowledge of the
Father), we have here also another passage, where it is written:
“Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and walketh as it were on
a pavement over the sea.”2550 For the
Gospel of the Lord has taught us that it was not the Father but the Son
that walked upon the sea, when Peter asked Him, saying, “Lord,
bid me come unto Thee.”2551 But even
prophecy itself gives proof of this. For holy Job prophesied of
the coming of the Lord; of Whom he said in truth that He would vanquish
the great Leviathan,2552 and it was
done. For that dread Leviathan that is, the devil, He smote, and
struck down, and laid low in the last times by the adorable Passion of
His own Body.2553
31. The Son therefore is only and true God for
this also is assigned to the Son as His sole right. For of no
created being can it be accurately said that he is alone. How can
he to whom fellowship in creation belongs be separated from the rest,
as though he were alone? Thus man is seen to be a rational being
amongst all earthly creatures, yet he is not the only rational being;
for we know that the heavenly works of God also are rational, we
confess that angels and archangels are rational beings. If then
the angels are rational, man cannot be said to be the only rational
being.
32. But they say that the sun can be said to
be alone, because there is no second sun. But the sun himself has
many things in common with the stars, for he travels across the
heavens, he is of that ethereal and heavenly substance, he is a
creature, and is reckoned amongst all the works of God. He serves
God in union with all, blesses Him with all, praises Him with
all.2554 Therefore he cannot accurately be
said to be alone, for he is not set apart from the rest.
33. Wherefore since no created being can be
compared with the Godhead of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost,
Which is alone, not amongst all, but over all (our declaration
concerning the Spirit being meanwhile held back); as the Father is said
to be the only true God, because He has nothing in common with others;
so also is the Son alone the Image of the true God, He alone is the
Hand of the Father, He alone is the Virtue and Wisdom of God.
34. Thus the Son alone does what the Father
does; for it is written: “Whatsoever things I do, He
doth.”2555 And since
the work of the Father and of the Son is one, it is well said of the
Father and the Son, that God worked alone; wherefore also when we speak
of the Creator, we own both the Father and the Son. For assuredly
when Paul said, “Who served the creature more than the
Creator,”2556 he neither denied
the Father to be the Creator, from Whom are all these things, nor yet
the Son, through Whom are all things.2557
35. And it does not seem out of agreement
with this that it is written: “Who alone hath
immortality.”2558 For how
could He not have immortality Who has life in Himself? He has it
in His nature; He has it in His essential Being; and He has it not as a
temporal
grace, but
owing to His eternal Godhead. He has it not by way of a gift as a
servant, but by peculiar right of His Generation, as the co-eternal
Son. He has it, too, as has the Father. “For as the
Father hath life in Himself, so also hath He given to the Son to have
life in Himself.”2559 As He has
it, it says, so He has given it. Thou hast learnt already how He
gave it,2560 that thou mayest
not think it to be a free gift of grace, when it is a secret of His
generation. Since, then, there is no divergence of life between
the Father and the Son, how can it be supposed that the Father alone
has immortality, whilst the Son has it not?
36. Wherefore let them understand that in
this passage the Son is not to be separated from the Father, Who is the
only true God. For they cannot prove that the Son is not the only
and true God, especially as here also it may be gathered, as I have
said, that Christ too is true and only God; or the passage may at least
be understood partly in reference to the Godhead of the Father and the
Son, and partly to the Incarnation of Christ: for knowledge is
not perfect unless it confesses Jesus Christ from eternity to be
only-begotten God, true Son of God, and, according to the flesh,
begotten of a Virgin. Which also this very Evangelist has taught
us elsewhere, saying: “Every spirit that confesseth that
Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God.”2561
37. Lastly, the whole of our passage teaches
us that it is not improper in this verse to understand a reference to
the sacrament of the Incarnation. For thus it is written:
“Father, the hour is come, glorify Thy Son.”2562 When, therefore, He states that the
hour is come, and prays to be glorified, how can one suppose Him to
have spoken but only in accordance with the assumption of our
flesh? For the Godhead has no fixed moments of time, nor does
eternal light stand in need of glorification. Therefore in the
only true God, Who is the Father, we also understand the only true Son
of God to be in accordance with the unity of the Godhead. And in
the name of Jesus Christ, which He received when born of the Virgin, we
acknowledge the sacrament of the Incarnation.
38. But if they wish to separate the Son,
when they read that the Father is the only true God, I suppose that
when they read of the Incarnation of the Son: “This is the
stone which was set at naught of you builders, which is become the head
of the corner;” and further: “There is none other
name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be
saved;”2563 then they
imagine the Father is to be cut off from the benefit of imparting
salvation to us. But there is neither salvation without the
Father, nor eternal life without the Son.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|