King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page




Bad Advertisement?

Are you a Christian?

Online Store:
  • Visit Our Store

  • HISTORY OF WARFARE OF SCIENCE WITH THEOLOGY IN CHRISTENDOM
    NEXT CHAPTER - HELP - GR VIDEOS - GR YOUTUBE - TWITTER - SD1 YOUTUBE    


    VOLS. 1, by Andrew D. White

    HYPERTEXT TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Introduction

    CHAPTER 1 — FROM CREATION TO EVOLUTION

  • I The Visible Universe
  • II Theological Teachings regarding the Animals and Man
  • III Theological and Scientific Theories of an Evolution in Animated Nature
  • IV The Final Effort of Theology

    CHAPTER 2 — GEOGRAPHY

  • I The Form of the Earth
  • II The Delineation of the Earth
  • III The Inhabitants of the Earth
  • IV The Size of the Earth
  • V The Character of the Earth’s Surface

    CHAPTER 3 — ASTRONOMY

  • I The Old Sacred Theory of the Universe
  • II The Heliocentric Theory
  • III The War upon Galileo
  • IV Victory of the Church over Galileo
  • V Results of the Victory over Galileo
  • VI The Retreat of the Church after its Victory over Galileo

    CHAPTER 4 — FROM “SIGNS AND WONDERS” TO LAW IN THE HEAVENS

  • I The Theological View
  • II Theological Efforts to crush the Scientific View
  • III The Invasion of Scepticism
  • IV Theological Efforts at Compromise

    CHAPTER 5 — FROM GENESIS TO GEOLOGY

  • I Growth of Theological Explanations
  • II Efforts to Suppress the Scientific View
  • III The First Great Effort of Compromise, based on the Flood of Noah
  • IV Final Efforts at Compromise

    CHAPTER 6 — THE ANTIQUITY OF MAN, EGYPTOLOGY, AND ASSYRIOLOGY

  • I The Sacred Chronology
  • II The New Chronology

    CHAPTER 7 — THE ANTIQUITY OF MAN AND PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY

  • I The Thunder-stones
  • II The Flint Weapons and Implements

    CHAPTER 8 — THE “FALL OF MAN” AND ANTHROPOLOGY

    CHAPTER 9 — THE “FALL OF MAN” AND ETHNOLOGY

    CHAPTER 10 — THE “FALL OF MAN” AND HISTORY

    CHAPTER 11 — FROM “THE PRINCE OF THE POWER OF THE AIR” TO METEOROLOGY

  • I Growth of a Theological Theory
  • II Diabolical Agency in Storms
  • III The Agency of Witches
  • IV Franklin’s Lightning-Rod

    CHAPTER 12 — FROM MAGIC TO CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS

  • I The Supremacy of Magic
  • II The Triumph of Chemistry and Physics

    CHAPTER 13 — FROM MIRACLES TO MEDICINE

  • I The Early And Sacred Theories Of Disease
  • II Growth Of Legends Of Healing The Life Of Xavier As A Typical Example
  • III The Mediaeval Miracles Of Healing Check Medical Science
  • IV The Attribution Of Disease To Satanic Influence — “Pastoral Medicine” Checks Scientific Effort.
  • V Theological Opposition To Anatomical Studies
  • VI New Beginnings Of Medical Science
  • VII Theological Discouragement Of Medicine VIII Fetich Cures Under Protestantism The Royal Touch
  • IX The Scientific Struggle For Anatomy
  • X Theological Opposition To Inoculation, Vaccination, And The Use Of Anaesthetics
  • XI Final Breaking Away Of The Theological THEORY IN MEDICINE

    CHAPTER 14 — FROM FETICH TO HYGIENE

  • I The Theological View Of Epidemics And Sanitation
  • II Gradual Decay Of Theological Views Regarding Sanitation
  • III The Triumph Of Sanitary Science
  • IV The Relation Of Sanitary Science To Religion

    CHAPTER 15 — FROM “DEMONIACAL POSSESSION” TO INSANITY

  • I Theological Ideas Of Lunacy And Its Treatment
  • II Beginnings Of A Healthful Scepticism
  • III The Final Struggle And Victory Of Science Pinel And Tuke

    CHAPTER 16 — FROM DIABOLISM TO HYSTERIA

  • I The Epidemics Of “Possession”
  • II Beginnings Of Helpful Scepticism
  • III Theological “Restatements” Final Triumph Of The Scientific View And Methods

    CHAPTER 17 — FROM BABEL TO COMPARATIVE PHILOLOGY

  • I The Sacred Theory In Its First Form
  • II The Sacred Theory Of Language In Its Second Form
  • III Breaking Down Of The Theological View
  • IV Triumph Of The New Science
  • V Summary

    CHAPTER 18 — FROM THE DEAD SEA LEGENDS TO COMPARATIVE MYTHOLOGY

  • I The Growth Of Explanatory Transformation Myths
  • II Mediaeval Growth Of The Dead Sea Legends
  • III Post-Reformation Culmination Of The Dead Sea Legends Beginnings Of A Healthful Scepticism
  • IV Theological Efforts At Compromise Triumph Of The Scientific View

    CHAPTER 19 — FROM LEVITICUS TO POLITICAL ECONOMY

  • I Origin And Progress Of Hostility To Loans At Interest
  • II Retreat Of The Church, Protestant And Catholic

    CHAPTER 20 — FROM THE DIVINE ORACLES TO THE HIGHER CRITICISM

  • I The Older Interpretation
  • II Beginnings Of Scientific Interpretation
  • III The Continued Growth Of Scientific Interpretation
  • IV The Closing Struggle
  • V Victory Of The Scientific And Literary Methods
  • VI Reconstructive Force Of Scientific Criticism

    Publishers Notes

    A HISTORY OF THE WARFARE OF SCIENCE WITH THEOLOGY IN CHRISTENDOM BY ANDREW DICKSON WHITE LL.D. (YALE), L.H.D. (COLUMBIA), PH.DR. (JENA) LATE PRESIDENT AND PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY (1896 Version)

    TWO VOLUMES COMBINED

    I DEDICATE THIS BOOK. Thoughts that great hearts once broke for, we Breathe cheaply in the common air. — L OWELL Dicipulus est prioris posterior dies. — P UBLIUS S YRUS Truth is the daughter of Time. — B ACON The Truth shall make you free. — J OHN 8:32.

    INTRODUCTION

    MY book is ready for the printer, and as I begin this preface my eye lights upon the crowd of Russian peasants at work on the Neva under my windows. With pick and shovel they are letting the rays of the April sun into the great ice barrier which binds together the modern quays and the old granite fortress where lie the bones of the Romanoff Czars.

    This barrier is already weakened; it is widely decayed, in many places thin, and everywhere treacherous; but it is, as a whole, so broad, so crystallized about old boulders, so imbedded in shallows, so wedged into crannies on either shore, that it is a great danger. The waters from thousands of swollen streamlets above are pressing behind it; wreckage and refuse are piling up against it; every one knows that it must yield. But there is danger that it may resist the pressure too long and break suddenly, wrenching even the granite quays from their foundations, bringing desolation to a vast population, and leaving, after the subsidence of the flood, a widespread residue of slime, a fertile breeding-bed for the germs of disease.

    But the patient mujiks are doing the right thing. The barrier, exposed more and more to the warmth of spring by the scores of channels they are making, will break away gradually, and the river will flow on beneficent and beautiful.

    My work in this book is like that of the Russian mujik on the Neva. I simply try to aid in letting the light of historical truth into that decaying mass of outworn thought which attaches the modern world to mediaeval conceptions of Christianity, and which still lingers among us — a most serious barrier to religion and morals, and a menace to the whole normal evolution of society.

    For behind this barrier also the flood is rapidly rising — the flood of increased knowledge and new thought; and this barrier also, though honeycombed and in many places thin, creates a dangerdanger of a sudden breaking away, distressing and calamitous, sweeping before it not only out worn creeds and noxious dogmas, but cherished principles and ideals, and even wrenching out most precious religious and moral foundations of the whole social and political fabric.

    My hope is to aid — even if it be but a little — in the gradual and healthful dissolving away of this mass of unreason, that the stream of “religion pure and undefiled” may flow on broad and clear, a blessing to humanity.

    And now a few words regarding the evolution of this book.

    It is something over a quarter of a century since I labored with Ezra Cornell in founding the university which bears his honored name.

    Our purpose was to establish in the State of New York an institution for advanced instruction and research, in which science, pure and applied, should have an equal place with literature; in which the study of literature, ancient and modern, should be emancipated as much as possible from pedantry; and which should be free from various useless trammels and vicious methods which at that period hampered many, if not most, of the American universities and colleges.

    We had especially determined that the institution should be under the control of no political party and of no single religious sect, and with Mr.

    Cornell’s approval I embodied stringent provisions to this effect in the charter.

    It had certainly never entered into the mind of either of us that in all this we were doing anything irreligious or unchristian. Mr. Cornell was reared a member of the Society of Friends; he had from his fortune liberally aided every form of Christian effort which he found going on about him, and among the permanent trustees of the public library which he had already founded, he had named all the clergymen of the town — Catholic and Protestant. As for myself, I had been bred a churchman, had recently been elected a trustee of one church college, and a professor in another; those nearest and dearest to me were devoutly religious; and, if I may be allowed to speak of a matter so personal to my self, my most cherished friendships were among deeply religious men and women, and my greatest sources of enjoyment were ecclesiastical architecture, religious music, and the more devout forms of poetry. So, far from wishing to injure Christianity, we both hoped to promote it; but we did not confound religion with sectarianism, and we saw in the sectarian character of American colleges and universities as a whole, a reason for the poverty of the advanced instruction then given in so many of them.

    It required no great acuteness to see that a system of control which, in selecting a Professor of Mathematics or Language or Rhetoric or Physics or Chemistry, asked first and above all to what sect or even to what wing or branch of a sect he belonged, could hardly do much to advance the moral, religious, or intellectual development of mankind.

    The reasons for the new foundation seemed to us, then, so cogent that we expected the co-operation of all good citizens, and anticipated no opposition from any source.

    As I look back across the intervening years, I know not whether to be more astonished or amused at our simplicity.

    Opposition began at once. In the State Legislature it confronted us at every turn, and it was soon in full blaze throughout the State — from the good Protestant bishop who proclaimed that all professors should be in holy orders, since to the Church alone was given the command, “Go, teach all nations,” to the zealous priest who published a charge that Goldwin Smith — a profoundly Christian scholar — had come to Cornell in order to inculcate the “infidelity of the Westminster Review ”; and from the eminent divine who went from city to city, denouncing the “atheistic and pantheistic tendencies” of the proposed education, to the perfervid minister who informed a denominational synod that Agassiz, the last great opponent of Darwin, and a devout theist, was “preaching Darwinism and atheism” in the new institution.

    As the struggle deepened, as hostile resolutions were introduced into various ecclesiastical bodies, as honored clergymen solemnly warned their flocks first against the “atheism,” then against the “infidelity,” and finally against the “indifferentism” of the university, as devoted pastors endeavored to dissuade young men from matriculation, I took the defensive, and, in answer to various attacks from pulpits and religious newspapers, attempted to allay the fears of the public. “Sweet reasonableness” was fully tried. There was established and endowed in the university perhaps the most effective Christian pulpit, and one of the most vigorous branches of the Christian Association, then in the United States; but all this did nothing to ward off the attack. The clause in the charter of the university forbidding it to give predominance to the doctrines of any sect, and above all the fact that much prominence was given to instruction in various branches of science, seemed to prevent all compromise, and it soon became clear that to stand on the defensive only made matters worse. Then it was that there was born in upon me a sense of the real difficulty — the antagonism between the theological and scientific view of the universe and of education in relation to it; therefore it was that, having been invited to deliver a lecture in the great hall of the Cooper Institute at New York, I took as my subject The Battlefields of Science , maintaining this thesis which follows: In all modern history, interference with science in the supposed interest of religion, no matter how conscientious such interference may have been, has resulted in the direst evils both to religion and science, and invariably; and, on the other hand, all untrammeled scientific investigation, no matter how dangerous to religion some of its stages may have seemed for the time to be, has invariably resulted in the highest good both of religion and science.

    The lecture was next day published in the New York Tribune at the request of Horace Greeley, its editor, who was also one of the Cornell University trustees. As a result of this widespread publication and of sundry attacks which it elicited, I was asked to maintain my thesis before various university associations and literary clubs; and I shall always remember with gratitude that among those who stood by me and presented me on the lecture platform with words of approval and cheer was my revered instructor, the Rev. Dr. Theodore Dwight Woolsey, at that time President of Yale College.

    My lecture grew — first into a couple of magazine articles, and then into a little book called The Warfare of Science , for which, when republished in England, Prof. John Tyndall wrote a preface.

    Sundry translations of this little book were published, but the most curious thing in its history is the fact that a very friendly introduction to the Swedish translation was written by a Lutheran bishop.

    Meanwhile Prof. John W. Draper published his book on The Conflict between Science and Religion , a work of great ability, which, as I then thought, ended the matter, so far as my giving it further attention was concerned.

    But two things led me to keep on developing my own work in this field:

    First, I had become deeply interested in it, and could not refrain from directing my observation and study to it; secondly, much as I admired Draper’s treatment of the questions involved, his point of view and mode of looking at history were different from mine.

    He regarded the struggle as one between Science and Religion. I believed then, and am convinced now, that it was a struggle between Science and Dogmatic Theology.

    More and more I saw that it was the conflict between two epochs in the evolution of human thought — the theological and the scientific.

    So I kept on, and from time to time published New Chapters in the Warfare of Science as magazine articles in The Popular Science Monthly .

    This was done under many difficulties. For twenty years, as President of Cornell University and Professor of History in that institution, I was immersed in the work of its early development. Besides this, I could not hold myself entirely aloof from public affairs, and was three times sent by the Government of the United States to do public duty abroad: first as a commissioner to Santo Domingo, in 1870; afterward as minister to Germany, in 1879; finally, as minister to Russia, in 1892; and was also called upon by the State of New York to do considerable labor in connection with international exhibitions at Philadelphia and at Paris. I was also obliged from time to time to throw off by travel the effects of overwork.

    The variety of residence and occupation arising from these causes may perhaps explain some peculiarities in this book which might otherwise puzzle my reader.

    While these journeyings have enabled me to collect materials over a very wide range — in the New World, from Quebec to Santo Domingo and from Boston to Mexico, San Francisco, and Seattle, and in the Old World from Trondhjem to Cairo and from St. Petersburg to Palermo — they have often obliged me to write under circumstances not very favorable: sometimes on an Atlantic steamer, sometimes on a Nile boat, and not only in my own library at Cornell, but in those of Berlin, Helsingfors, Munich, Florence, and the British Museum. This fact will explain to the benevolent reader not only the citation of different editions of the same authority in different Chapters, but some iterations which in the steady quiet of my own library would not have been made.

    It has been my constant endeavor to write for the general reader, avoiding scholastic and technical terms as much as possible and stating the truth simply as it presents itself to me.

    That errors of omission and commission will be found here and there is probable — nay, certain; but the substance of the book will, I believe, be found fully true. I am encouraged in this belief by the fact that, of the three bitter attacks which this work in its earlier form has already encountered, one was purely declamatory, objurgatory, and hortatory, and the others based upon ignorance of facts easily pointed out.

    And here I must express my thanks to those who have aided me. First and above all to my former student and dear friend, Prof. George Lincoln Burr, of Cornell University, to whose contributions, suggestions, criticisms, and cautions I am most deeply indebted; also to my friends U. G. Weatherly, formerly Traveling Fellow of Cornell, and now Assistant Professor in the University of Indiana, — Prof. and Mrs. Earl Barnes and Prof. William H.

    Hudson, of Stanford University, — and Prof. E. P. Evans, formerly of the University of Michigan, but now of Munich, for extensive aid in researches upon the lines I have indicated to them, but which I could never have prosecuted without their co-operation. In libraries at home and abroad they have all worked for me most effectively, and I am deeply grateful to them.

    This book is presented as a sort of Festschrift — a tribute to Cornell University as it enters the second quarter-century of its existence, and probably my last tribute.

    The ideas for which so bitter a struggle was made at its foundation have triumphed. Its faculty, numbering over one hundred and, fifty; its students, numbering but little short of two thousand; its noble buildings and equipment; the munificent gifts, now amounting to millions of dollars, which it has received from public-spirited men and women; the evidences of public confidence on all sides; and, above all, the adoption of its cardinal principles and main features by various institutions of learning in other States, show this abundantly. But there has been a triumph far greater and wider. Everywhere among the leading modern nations the same general tendency is seen. During the quarter-century just past the control of public instruction, not only in America but in the leading nations of Europe, has passed more and more from the clergy to the laity. Not only are the presidents of the larger universities in the United States, with but one or two exceptions, laymen, but the same thing is seen in the old European strongholds of metaphysical theology. At my first visit to Oxford and Cambridge, forty years ago, they were entirely under ecclesiastical control.

    Now, all this is changed. An eminent member of the present British Government has recently said, “A candidate for high university position is handicapped by holy orders.” I refer to this with not the slightest feeling of hostility toward the clergy, for I have none; among them are many of my dearest friends; no one honors their proper work more than I; but the above fact is simply noted as proving the continuance of that evolution which I have endeavored to describe in this series of monographs — an evolution, indeed, in which the warfare of Theology against Science has been one of the most active and powerful agents. My belief is that in the field left to them — their proper field — the clergy will more and more, as they cease to struggle against scientific methods and conclusions, do work even nobler and more beautiful than anything they have heretofore done.

    And this is saying much. My conviction is that Science, though it has evidently conquered Dogmatic Theology based on biblical texts and ancient modes of thought, will go hand in hand with Religion; and that, although theological control will continue to diminish, Religion, as seen in the recognition of “a Power in the universe, not ourselves, which makes for righteousness,” and in the love of God and of our neighbor, will steadily grow stronger and stronger, not only in the American institutions of learning but in the world at large. Thus may the declaration of Micah as to the requirements of Jehovah, the definition by St. James of “pure religion and undefiled,” and, above all, the precepts and ideals of the blessed Founder of Christianity himself, be brought to bear more and more effectively on mankind.

    I close this preface some days after its first lines were written. The sun of spring has done its work on the Neva; the great river flows tranquilly on, a blessing and a joy; the mujiks are forgotten. — A D W LEGATION OF THE UNITED STATES, ST PETERSBURG, April 14,1894.

    P. S. — Owing to a wish to give more thorough revision to some parts of my work, it has been withheld from the press until the present date. — A D W CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, N Y, August 15, 1895.

    GOTO NEXT CHAPTER - SCIENCE VS. THEOLOGY INDEX & SEARCH

    God Rules.NET
    Search 80+ volumes of books at one time. Nave's Topical Bible Search Engine. Easton's Bible Dictionary Search Engine. Systematic Theology Search Engine.