Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Pagan Philosophy the Parent of Heresies. The Connection Between Deflections from Christian Faith and the Old Systems of Pagan Philosophy. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter VII.—Pagan
Philosophy the Parent of Heresies. The Connection Between Deflections
from Christian Faith and the Old Systems of Pagan
Philosophy.
These are “the doctrines” of men and
“of demons”1911 produced for
itching ears of the spirit of this world’s wisdom: this the Lord
called “foolishness,”1912
1912 1 Cor.
iii. 18 and 25. | and
“chose the foolish things of the world” to confound even
philosophy itself. For (philosophy) it is which is the material of the
world’s wisdom, the rash interpreter of the nature and the
dispensation of God. Indeed1913 heresies are
themselves instigated1914 by philosophy. From
this source came the Æons, and I known not what infinite
forms,1915
1915 Formeæ,
“Ideæ” (Oehler). | and the trinity of
man1916
1916 See Tertullian’s
treatises, adversus Valentinum, xxv., and de Anima,
xxi.; also Epiphanius, Hær. xxxi . 23. | in the system of Valentinus, who was of
Plato’s school. From the same source came Marcion’s better
god, with all his tranquillity; he came of the Stoics. Then, again, the
opinion that the soul dies is held by the Epicureans; while the denial
of the restoration of the body is taken from the aggregate school of
all the philosophers; also, when matter is made equal to God, then you
have the teaching of Zeno; and when any doctrine is alleged touching a
god of fire, then Heraclitus comes in. The same subject-matter is
discussed over and over again1917 by the heretics and
the philosophers; the same arguments1918 are involved.
Whence comes evil? Why is it permitted? What is the origin of man? and
in what way does he come? Besides the question which Valentinus has
very lately proposed—Whence comes God? Which he settles with the
answer: From enthymesis and
ectroma.1919
1919 “De
enthymesi;” for this word Tertullian gives animationem (in
his tract against Valentinus, ix.), which seems to mean, “the
mind in operation.” (See the same treatise, x. xi.) With regard
to the other word, Jerome (on Amos. iii.) adduces Valentinus as calling
Christ ἔκτρωμα, that is,
abortion. |
Unhappy Aristotle! who invented for these men dialectics, the art of
building up and pulling down; an art so evasive in its
propositions,1920 so far-fetched in
its conjectures, so harsh, in its arguments, so productive of
contentions—embarrassing1921 even to itself,
retracting everything, and really treating of1922
1922 Tractaverit, in
the sense of conclusively settling. |
nothing! Whence spring those “fables and endless
genealogies,”1923 and
“unprofitable questions,”1924
and “words which spread like a cancer?”1925 From all these, when the apostle would
restrain us, he expressly names philosophy as that which he
would have us be on our guard against. Writing to the Colossians, he
says, “See that no one beguile you through philosophy and vain
deceit, after the tradition of men, and contrary to the wisdom of the
Holy Ghost.”1926
1926 Col. ii. 8. The last clause, “præter
providentiam Spiritus Sancti,” is either Tertullian’s
reading, or his gloss of the apostle’s οὐ κατὰ
Χριστόν—“not
after Christ.” | He had been at
Athens, and had in his interviews (with its philosophers) become
acquainted with that human wisdom which pretends to know the truth,
whilst it only corrupts it, and is itself divided into its own manifold
heresies, by the variety of its mutually repugnant sects. What indeed
has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the
Academy and the Church? what between heretics and Christians? Our
instruction comes from “the porch of Solomon,”1927 who had himself taught that “the Lord
should be sought in simplicity of heart.”1928
Away with1929 all attempts to
produce a mottled Christianity of Stoic, Platonic, and dialectic
composition! We want no curious disputation after possessing Christ
Jesus, no inquisition after enjoying the gospel! With our faith, we
desire no further belief. For this is our palmary faith, that there is
nothing which we ought to believe besides.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|