Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Deceived by His Own Fault, He Falls into the Errors of the Manichæans, Who Gloried in the True Knowledge of God and in a Thorough Examination of Things. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter VI.—Deceived by His Own
Fault, He Falls into the Errors of the Manichæans, Who Gloried in
the True Knowledge of God and in a Thorough Examination of
Things.
10. Therefore I fell among men proudly raving,
very carnal, and voluble, in whose mouths were the snares of the
devil—the birdlime being composed of a mixture of the syllables
of Thy name, and of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of the Paraclete,
the Holy Ghost, the Comforter.230
230 So, in Book xxii. sec. 13 of his reply to Faustus,
he charges them with “professing to believe the New Testament in
order to entrap the unwary;” and again, in sec. 15, he says: “
They claim the impious liberty of holding and teaching, that
whatever they deem favourable to their heresy was said by Christ
and the apostles; while they have the profane boldness to say, that
whatever in the same writings is unfavourable to them is a spurious
interpolation.” They professed to believe in the doctrine of the
Trinity, but affirmed (ibid. xx. 6) “that the Father
dwells in a secret light, the power of the Son in the sun, and His
wisdom in the moon, and the Holy Spirit in the air.” It was this
employment of the phraseology of Scripture to convey doctrines
utterly unscriptural that rendered their teaching such a snare to
the unwary. See also below, v. 12, note. | These names departed not out of
their mouths, but so far forth as the sound only and the clatter of
the tongue, for the heart was empty of truth. Still they cried,
“Truth, Truth,” and spoke much about it to me, “yet was it
not in them;”231 but they
spake falsely not of Thee only—who, verily, art the Truth—but
also of these elements of this world, Thy
creatures. And I, in truth, should
have passed by philosophers, even when speaking truth concerning
them, for love of Thee, my Father, supremely good, beauty of all
things beautiful. O Truth, Truth! how inwardly even then did the
marrow of my soul pant after Thee, when they frequently, and in a
multiplicity of ways, and in numerous and huge books, sounded out
Thy name to me, though it was but a voice!232
232 There was something peculiarly enthralling to an
ardent mind like Augustin’s in the Manichæan system. That system
was kindred in many ways to modern Rationalism. Reason was exalted
at the expense of faith. Nothing was received on mere authority,
and the disciple’s inner consciousness was the touchstone of
truth. The result of this is well pointed out by Augustin (Con.
Faust, xxxii. sec. 19): “Your design, clearly, is to deprive
Scripture of all authority, and to make every man’s mind the
judge what passage of Scripture he is to approve of, and what to
disapprove of. This is not to be subject to Scripture in matters of
faith, but to make Scripture subject to you. Instead of making the
high authority of Scripture the reason of approval, every man makes
his approval the reason for thinking a passage correct.” Compare
also Con. Faust, xi. sec. 2, and xxxii. sec. 16. | And these were the dishes in which
to me, hungering for Thee, they, instead of Thee, served up the sun
and moon, Thy beauteous works—but yet Thy works, not Thyself,
nay, nor Thy first works. For before these corporeal works are Thy
spiritual ones, celestial and shining though they be. But I
hungered and thirsted not even after those first works of Thine,
but after Thee Thyself, the Truth, “with whom is no variableness,
neither shadow of turning;”233 yet they still served up to me in
those dishes glowing phantasies, than which better were it to love
this very sun (which, at least, is true to our sight), than those
illusions which deceive the mind through the eye. And yet, because
I supposed them to be Thee, I fed upon them; not with avidity, for
Thou didst not taste to my mouth as Thou art, for Thou wast not
these empty fictions; neither was I nourished by them, but the
rather exhausted. Food in our sleep appears like our food awake;
yet the sleepers are not nourished by it, for they are asleep. But
those things were not in any way like unto Thee as Thou hast now
spoken unto me, in that those were corporeal phantasies, false
bodies, than which these true bodies, whether celestial or
terrestrial, which we perceive with our fleshly sight, are much
more certain. These things the very beasts and birds perceive as
well as we, and they are more certain than when we imagine them.
And again, we do with more certainty imagine them, than by them
conceive of other greater and infinite bodies which have no
existence. With such empty husks was I then fed, and was not fed.
But Thou, my Love, in looking for whom I fail234 that I may be strong, art neither
those bodies that we see, although in heaven, nor art Thou those
which we see not there; for Thou hast created them, nor dost Thou
reckon them amongst Thy greatest works. How far, then, art Thou
from those phantasies of mine, phantasies of bodies which are not
at all, than which the images of those bodies which are, are more
certain, and still more certain the bodies themselves, which yet
Thou art not; nay, nor yet the soul, which is the life of the
bodies. Better, then, and more certain is the life of bodies than
the bodies themselves. But Thou art the life of souls, the life of
lives, having life in Thyself; and Thou changest not, O Life of my
soul.
11. Where, then, wert Thou then to me, and how
far from me? Far, indeed, was I wandering away from Thee, being
even shut out from the very husks of the swine, whom with husks I
fed.235 For how much
better, then, are the fables of the grammarians and poets than
these snares! For verses, and poems, and Medea flying, are more
profitable truly than these men’s five elements, variously
painted, to answer to the five caves of darkness,236
236 See below, xii. sec. 6, note. | none of which exist, and which slay
the believer. For verses and poems I can turn into237
237 “Of this passage St. Augustin is probably
speaking when he says, ‘Praises bestowed on bread in simplicity
of heart, let him (Petilian) defame, if he will, by the ludicrous
title of poisoning and corrupting frenzy.’ Augustin meant in
mockery, that by verses he could get his bread; his calumniator
seems to have twisted the word to signify a love-potion.—Con.
Lit. Petiliani, iii. 16.”—E. B. P. | true food,
but the “Medea flying,” though I sang, I maintained it not;
though I heard it sung, I believed it not; but those things I did
believe. Woe, woe, by what steps was I dragged down “to the
depths of hell!”238 —toiling and turmoiling through
want of Truth, when I sought after Thee, my God,—to Thee I
confess it, who hadst mercy on me when I had not yet
confessed,—sought after Thee not according to the understanding
of the mind, in which Thou desiredst that I should excel the
beasts, but according to the sense of the flesh! Thou wert more
inward to me than my most inward part; and higher than my highest.
I came upon that bold woman, who “is simple, and knoweth
nothing,”239 the enigma
of Solomon, sitting “at the door of the house on a seat,” and
saying, “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is
pleasant.”240 This woman
seduced me, because she found my soul beyond its portals, dwelling
in the eye of my flesh, and thinking on such food as through it I
had devoured.
E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|