Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Expositio Fidei. (Statement of Faith.) PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Statement of Faith.
————————————
1. We believe in one
Unbegotten428
428 See
de Syn. §§3, 46, 47, and the Excursus in
Lightfoot’s Ignatius, vol. ii. pp. 90 and foll (first
ed.). | God, Father Almighty, maker of all
things both visible and invisible, that hath His being from Himself.
And in one Only-begotten Word, Wisdom, Son, begotten of the Father
without beginning and eternally; word not pronounced429
429 Cf.
note by Newman on de Synodis, §26 (5). |
nor mental, nor an effluence430
430 Cf.
Newman’s note (8) on de Decr. §11. | of the Perfect, nor a
dividing of the impassible Essence, nor an issue431
431 Or
‘development’ (Gr. προβολή) a word with Gnostic and Sabellian antecedents, cf.
Newman’s note 8 on de Synodis, §16. | ;
but absolutely perfect Son, living and powerful (Heb. iv. 12), the true Image of the Father, equal in
honour and glory. For this, he says, ‘is the will of the Father,
that as they honour the Father, so they may honour the Son also’
(Joh. v. 23): very God of very God, as John says in
his general Epistles, ‘And we are in Him that is true, even in
His Son Jesus Christ: this is the true God and everlasting life’
(1 Joh. v. 20): Almighty of Almighty. For all things
which the Father rules and sways, the Son rules and sways likewise:
wholly from the Whole, being like432
432 This
word, which became the watchword of the Acacian party, the successors
of the Eusebians, marks the relatively early date of this treatise. At
a later period Athanasius would not use it without qualification (see
Orat. ii. §22, note 4), and later still, rejected the Word
entirely as misleading (de Synodis, §53. note 9). Yet see
ad Afros. 7, and Orat. ii. 34. | the Father as
the Lord says, ‘he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father’
(Joh. xiv. 9). But He was begotten ineffably and
incomprehensibly, for ‘who shall declare his generation?’
(Isa. liii. 8), in other words, no one can. Who, when
at the consummation of the ages (Heb. ix. 26), He had descended from the bosom of the
Father, took from the undefiled Virgin Mary our humanity (ἄνθρωπον), Christ Jesus,
whom He delivered of His own will to suffer for us, as the Lord saith:
‘No man taketh My life from Me. I have power to lay it down, and
have power to take it again’ (Joh. x. 18). In which humanity He was crucified and
died for us, and rose from the dead, and was taken up into the heavens,
having been created as the beginning of ways for us (Prov. viii. 22), when on earth He shewed us light from
out of darkness, salvation from error, life from the dead, an entrance
to paradise, from which Adam was cast out, and into which he again
entered by means of the thief, as the Lord said, ‘This day shalt
thou be with Me in paradise’ (Luke xxiii. 43), into which Paul also once entered. [He
shewed us] also a way up to the heavens, whither the humanity of the
Lord433
433 ὁ κυριακὸς
ἄνθρωπος (see above, introductory remarks). The expression is quoted as
used by Ath., apparently from this passage, by Rufinus (Hieron. Opp.
ix. p. 131, ed. 1643), Theodoret, Dial. 3, and others. The
expression ‘Dominicus Homo’ used by St. Augustine is
rendered ‘Divine Man’ in Nicene and P. N. Fathers,
Series i. vol. vi. p. 40 b. | , in which He will judge the quick and the
dead, entered as precursor for us. We believe, likewise, also in the
Holy Spirit that searcheth all things, even the deep things of God
(1 Cor. ii. 10), and we anathematise doctrines contrary
to this.
2. For neither do we hold a Son-Father, as do the
Sabellians, calling Him of one but not of the same434
434 μονοούσιον
καὶ οὐχ
ὁμοούσιον (see Prolegg. ch. ii. §3 (2) b sub fin.). The
distinction cannot (to those accustomed to use the ‘Nicene’
Creed in English) be rendered so as to imply a real difference. The
real distinction lies, not in the prefixes μονο- and
ὁμο-, but in the sense to be attached to the ambiguous term
οὐσία |
essence, and thus destroying the existence of the Son. Neither do we
ascribe the passible body which He bore for the salvation of the whole
world to the Father. Neither can we imagine three Subsistences
separated from each other, as results from their bodily nature in the
case of men, lest we hold a plurality of gods like the heathen. But
just as a river, produced from a well, is not separate, and yet there
are in fact two visible objects and two names. For neither is the
Father the Son, nor the Son the Father. For the Father is Father of the
Son, and the Son, Son of the Father. For like as the well is not a
river, nor the river a well, but both are one and the same water which
is conveyed in a channel from the well to the river, so the
Father’s deity passes into the Son without flow and without
division. For the Lord says, ‘I came out from the Father and am
come’ (Joh. xvi. 28). But He is ever with the Father, for He is in the bosom of the
Father, nor was ever the bosom of the Father void of the deity of the
Son. For He says, ‘I was by Him as one setting in order’
(Prov. viii. 30). But we do not regard God the Creator
of all, the Son of God, as a creature, or thing made, or as made out of
nothing, for He is truly existent from Him who exists, alone existing
from Him who alone exists, in as much as the like glory and power was
eternally and conjointly begotten of the Father. For ‘He that
hath seen’ the Son ‘hath seen the Father (Joh. xiv. 9). All things to wit were made through
the Son; but He Himself is not a creature, as Paul says of the Lord:
‘In Him were all things created, and He is before all’
(Col. i. 16). Now He says not, ‘was
created’ before all things, but ‘is’ before all
things. To be created, namely, is applicable to all things, but
‘is before all’ applies to the Son only.
3. He is then by nature an Offspring, perfect
from the Perfect, begotten before all the hills (Prov. viii. 25), that is before every rational and
intelligent essence, as Paul also in another place calls Him
‘first-born of all creation’ (Col. i. 15). But by calling Him First-born, He
shews that He is not a Creature, but Offspring of the Father. For it
would be inconsistent with His deity for Him to be called a creature.
For all things were created by the Father through the Son, but the Son
alone was eternally begotten from the Father, whence God the Word is
‘first-born of all creation,’ unchangeable from
unchangeable. However, the body which He wore for our sakes is a
creature: concerning which Jeremiah says, according to the edition of
the seventy translators435
435 Heb.
For the Lord hath created a new thing in the earth, A woman shall
encompass a man.’ Cf.Orat. ii. 46, note 5. | (Jer. xxxi. 22): ‘The Lord created for us for a
planting a new salvation, in which salvation men shall go about:’
but according to Aquila the same text runs: ‘The Lord created a
new thing in woman.’ Now the salvation created for us for a
planting, which is new, not old, and for us, not before us, is Jesus,
Who in respect of the Saviour436
436 The
same phrase also in Serm. M. de Fid. 18. | was made man, and
whose name is translated in one place Salvation, in another Saviour.
But salvation proceeds from the Saviour, just as illumination does from
the light. The salvation, then, which was from the Saviour, being
created new, did, as Jeremiah says, ‘create for us a new
salvation,’ and as Aquila renders: ‘The Lord created a new
thing in woman,’ that is in Mary. For nothing new was created in
woman, save the Lord’s body, born of the Virgin Mary without
intercourse, as also it says in the Proverbs in the person of Jesus:
‘The Lord created me, a beginning of His ways for His
works’ (Prov. viii.
22). Now He does not say,
‘created me before His works,’ lest any should take the
text of the deity of the Word.
4. Each text then which refers to the creature is
written with reference to Jesus in a bodily sense. For the Lord’s
Humanity437
437 κυριακὸς
ἄνθρωπος, see above. | was created as ‘a beginning of
ways,’ and He manifested it to us for our salvation. For by it we
have our access to the Father. For He is the way (Joh. xiv. 6) which leads us back to the Father. And
a way is a corporeal visible thing, such as is the Lord’s
humanity. Well, then, the Word of God created all things, not being a
creature, but an offspring. For He created none of the created things
equal or like unto Himself. But it is the part of a Father to beget,
while it is a workman’s part to create. Accordingly, that body is
a thing made and created, which the Lord bore for us, which was
begotten for us438
438 ἐγεννήθη (1 Cor. i. 30, ἐγενήθη). The two words are constantly confused in mss., and I suspect that ἐγενήθη,
which (pace Swainson p. 78, note) the context really requires,
was what Ath. wrote. | , as Paul says,
‘wisdom from God, and sanctification and righteousness, and
redemption;’ while yet the Word was before us and before all
Creation, and is, the Wisdom of the Father. But the Holy Spirit, being
that which proceeds from the Father, is ever in the hands439
439 See
also de Sent. Dionys. 17. | of the Father Who sends and of the Son Who
conveys Him, by Whose means He filled all things. The Father,
possessing His existence from Himself, begat the Son, as we said, and
did not create Him, as a river from a well and as a branch from a root,
and as brightness from a light, things which nature knows to be
indivisible; through whom to the Father be glory and power and
greatness before all ages, and unto all the ages of the ages.
Amen.E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|