Bad Advertisement?
Are you a Christian?
Online Store:Visit Our Store
| Chapter IX. The objection that the Son, being sent by the Father, is, in that regard at least, inferior, is met by the answer that He was also sent by the Spirit, Who is yet not considered greater than the Son. Furthermore, the Spirit, in His turn, is sent by the Father to the Son, in order that Their unity in action might be shown forth. It is our duty, therefore, carefully to distinguish what utterances are to be fitly ascribed to Christ as God, and what to be ascribed to Him as man. PREVIOUS SECTION - NEXT SECTION - HELP
Chapter IX.
The objection that the Son, being sent by the Father,
is, in that regard at least, inferior, is met by the answer that He was
also sent by the Spirit, Who is yet not considered greater than the
Son. Furthermore, the Spirit, in His turn, is sent by the Father
to the Son, in order that Their unity in action might be shown
forth. It is our duty, therefore, carefully to distinguish what
utterances are to be fitly ascribed to Christ as God, and what to be
ascribed to Him as man.
74. I have no fears
in the matter of that commonly advanced objection, that Christ is
inferior because He was sent. For even if He be inferior, yet
this is not so proved;2005
2005 That is to say, it does
not follow, from the fact that the Son was sent, that He is inferior in
nature. | on the other hand,
His equal title to honour is in truth proved. Since all honour
the Son as they honour the Father,2006 it is certain
that the Son is not, in so far as being sent, inferior.
75. Regard not, therefore, the narrow bounds
of human language, but the plain meaning of the words, and believe
facts accomplished. Bethink you that our Lord Jesus Christ said
in Isaiah that He had been sent by the Spirit.2007
2007 Isa. lxi. 1. “Since the Holy
Scriptures frequently, in plain words, teach the equality of the Son
with the Father, and the Son’s actual deeds likewise testify
thereto, it is not permissible to call that truth in question on the
strength of a single phrase, which we are compelled to make use of, in
speaking of God, by reason of the limitations of human language.
For in speaking of God, and the things of God, we make use of terms
which we employ in treating of created natures, and which on that
account convey the notion of imperfection which is found only in such
natures.”—Hurter in loc. | Is the Son, therefore, less than the
Spirit because He was sent by the Spirit? Thus you have the
record, that the Son declares Himself sent by the Father and His
Spirit. “I am the beginning,” He saith,2008 “and I live for ever, and My hand
hath laid the foundations of the earth, My right hand hath made the
heaven to stand abidingly;”2009 and further
on: “I have spoken, and I have called; I have brought him,
and have made his way to prosper. Draw ye near to Me, and hear
these things: not in secret have I spoken from the
beginning. When they were made, I was there: and now hath
the Lord and His Spirit sent Me.”2010 Here, indeed, He Who made the heaven
and the earth Himself saith that He is sent by the Lord and His
Spirit. Ye see, then, that the poverty of language takes not from
the honour of His mission. He, then, is sent by the Father; by
the Spirit also is He sent.
76. And that you may gather that there is no
separating difference of majesty, the Son in turn sends the Spirit,
even as He Himself hath said: “But when the Comforter is
come, whom I will send you from My Father—the Spirit of truth,
who cometh forth from My Father.”2011 That this same Comforter is also to be
sent by the Father He has already taught, saying, “But the
Comforter, that Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My
name.”2012 Behold their
unity, inasmuch as whom God the Father sends, the Son sends also, and
Whom the Father sends, the Spirit sends also. Else, if the Arians
will not admit that the Son was sent, because we read that the Son is
the right hand of the Father, then they themselves will confess with
respect to the Father, what they deny concerning the Son, unless
perchance they discover for themselves either another Father or another
Son.
77. A truce, then, to vain wranglings over words,
for the kingdom of God, as it is written, consisteth not in persuasive
words, but in power plainly shown forth. Let us take heed to the
distinction of the Godhead from the flesh. In each there speaks
one and the same Son of God, for each nature is present in Him; yet
while it is the same Person Who speaks, He speaks not always in the
same manner. Behold in Him, now the
glory of God, now the affections of man.
As God He speaks the things of God, because He is the Word; as man He
speaks the things of man, because He speaks in my nature.
78. “This is the living bread, which
came down from heaven.”2013 This bread
is His flesh, even as He Himself said: “This bread which I
will give is My flesh.”2014 This is He
Who came down from heaven, this is He Whom the Father hath sanctified
and sent into this world. Even the letter itself teaches us that
not the Godhead but the flesh needed sanctification, for the Lord
Himself said, “And I sanctify Myself for them,”2015 in order that thou mayest acknowledge that
He is both sanctified in the flesh for us, and sanctifies by virtue of
His Divinity.
79. This is the same One Whom the Father
sent, but “born of a woman, born under the law,”2016 as the Apostle hath said. This is He
Who saith: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me; wherefore He
hath anointed Me, to bring good tidings to the poor hath He sent
Me:”2017 This is He
Who saith: “My doctrine is not Mine, but His, Who sent
Me. If any man will do His will, he shall know of the doctrine,
whether it be of God, or whether I speak of Myself.”2018 Doctrine that is of God, then, is
one thing; doctrine that is of man, another; and so when the Jews,
regarding Him as man, called in question His teaching,2019
2019
“regarding Him as man.” In the original
“secundum hominem,” lit. “after the way, or
manner, of man.” If the Jews had accepted Jesus
Christ’s teachings as divine, they would not have questioned
it. But they acted as though they were confronted with one who
was no more than man, and whose authority therefore was properly liable
to be called in question. | and said, “How knoweth this man
letters, having never learnt?” Jesus answered and said,
“My doctrine is not Mine,” for, in teaching without
elegance of letters, He seems to teach not as man, but rather as God,
having not learned, but devised His doctrine.
80. For He hath found and devised all the
way of discipline, as we read above, inasmuch as of the Son of God it
hath been said: “This is our God, and none other shall be
accounted of in comparison with Him, Who hath found all the way of
discipline. After these things He was seen on earth, and
conversed with men.”2020 How, then,
could He, as divine, not have His own doctrine—He Who hath found
all the way of discipline before He was seen on earth? Or how is
He inferior, of Whom it is said, “None shall be accounted of in
comparison with Him”? Surely He is entitled incomparable,
in comparison of Whom none other can be accounted of—yet so that
He cannot be accounted of before the Father. Now if men suppose
that the Father is spoken of, they shall not escape running into the
blasphemy of Sabellius, of ascribing the assumption of human nature to
the Father.
81. Let us proceed with what follows.
“He who speaketh of himself, seeketh his own
glory.”2021 See the
unity wherein Father and Son are plainly revealed.2022
2022 “In these
words attention is called to the Unity of Nature (or Substance) in
distinct Persons, for in the very act of speaking and teaching, the Son
shows that He is a Person, but He Who speaks not of Himself, but as the
Father hath taught Him, shows that He is distinct from the Father, and
yet He has, with the Father, one and the same doctrine, and therefore
one and the same nature; for, in God, being and knowing are one and the
same.”—Hurter. | He who speaks cannot but be; yet
that which He speaks cannot be solely from Him, for in Him all that is,
is naturally derived from the Father.
82. What now is the meaning of the words
“seeketh his own glory”? That is, not a glory in
which the Father has no part—for indeed the Word of God is His
glory. Again, our Lord saith: “that they may see My
glory.”2023 But that
glory of the Word is also the glory of the Father, even as it is
written: “The Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the
Father.”2024 In regard
of His Godhead, therefore, the Son of God so hath His own glory, that
the glory of Father and Son is one: He is not, therefore,
inferior in splendour, for the glory is one, nor lower in Godhead, for
the fulness of the Godhead is in Christ.2025
83. How, then, you ask, is it written,
“Father, the hour is come; glorify Thy Son?”2026 He Who saith these words needs to be
glorified, say you. Thus far you have eyes to see; the remainder
of the Scripture you have not read, for it proceeds: “that
Thy Son may glorify Thee.” Hath ever the Father need of
any, in that He is to be glorified by the Son?E.C.F. INDEX & SEARCH
|