Anf-01 ix.vi.iii Pg 18
Isa. lxvi. 1.
And besides this Being there is no other God; otherwise He would not be termed by the Lord either “God” or “the great King;” for a Being who can be so described admits neither of any other being compared with nor set above Him. For he who has any superior over him, and is under the power of another, this being never can be called either “God” or “the great King.”
Anf-02 v.ii.ix Pg 6.1
Anf-02 vi.ii.viii Pg 11.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.ii.ii Pg 6.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.v.xi Pg 22.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.v.xiv Pg 139.1
Anf-03 v.ix.xvi Pg 19
Isa. lxvi. 1.
in whom is every place, but Himself is in no place; who is the utmost bound of the universe;—how happens it, I say, that He (who, though) the Most High, should yet have walked in paradise towards the cool of the evening, in quest of Adam; and should have shut up the ark after Noah had entered it; and at Abraham’s tent should have refreshed Himself under an oak; and have called to Moses out of the burning bush; and have appeared as “the fourth” in the furnace of the Babylonian monarch (although He is there called the Son of man),—unless all these events had happened as an image, as a mirror, as an enigma (of the future incarnation)? Surely even these things could not have been believed even of the Son of God, unless they had been given us in the Scriptures; possibly also they could not have been believed of the Father, even if they had been given in the Scriptures, since these men bring Him down into Mary’s womb, and set Him before Pilate’s judgment-seat, and bury Him in the sepulchre of Joseph. Hence, therefore, their error becomes manifest; for, being ignorant that the entire order of the divine administration has from the very first had its course through the agency of the Son, they believe that the Father Himself was actually seen, and held converse with men, and worked, and was athirst, and suffered hunger (in spite of the prophet who says: “The everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, shall never thirst at all, nor be hungry;”7978 7978
Npnf-201 iv.viii.ii Pg 3
Anf-01 ix.iv.vii Pg 20
Jer. x. 11.
For, from the fact of his having subjoined their destruction, he shows them to be no gods at all. Elias, too, when all Israel was assembled at Mount Carmel, wishing to turn them from idolatry, says to them, “How long halt ye between two opinions?3346 3346 Literally, “In both houghs,” in ambabus suffraginibus.
If the Lord be God,3347 3347 The old Latin translation has, “Si unus est Dominus Deus”—If the Lord God is one; which is supposed by the critics to have occurred through carelessness of the translator.
follow Him.”3348 3348
Npnf-201 iii.xvi.iv Pg 29
Anf-02 vi.iv.i.iv Pg 4.1
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 1
VERSE (2) - 1Ki 8:27 2Ch 2:12 Isa 66:1 Jer 10:11 Da 2:21,28; 5:23
