| |  |
PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Joel 2:7
CHAPTERS: Joel 1, 2, 3 
VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32
TEXT: BIB | AUDIO: MISLR - MISC - DAVIS | VIDEO: BIB - COMM
ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE
HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB
|
ως 5613 μαχηται δραμουνται και 2532 ως 5613 ανδρες 435 πολεμισται αναβησονται επι 1909 τα 3588 τειχη 5038 και 2532 εκαστος 1538 εν 1722 1520 τη 3588 οδω 3598 αυτου 847 πορευσεται 4198 5695 και 2532 ου 3739 3757 μη 3361 εκκλινωσιν τας 3588 τριβους 5147 αυτων 846
Douay Rheims Bible They shall run like valiant men: like men of war they shall scale the wall: the men shall march every one on his way, and they shall not turn aside from their ranks.
King James Bible - Joel 2:7 They shall run like mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks:
World English Bible They run like mighty men. They climb the wall like warriors. They each march in his line, and they don't swerve off course.
World Wide Bible Resources
Joel 2:7
Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325) Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxvi Pg 39
See 2 Sam. v. 6–8. —in which respect (I should rather say) that they were a type of people equally blind,4954 4954 The Marcionites. who in after-times would not admit Christ to be the son of David—so, on the contrary, Christ succoured the blind man, to show by this act that He was not David’s son, and how different in disposition He was, kind to the blind, while David ordered them to be slain.4955 4955
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxvi Pg 41
See 2 Sam. v. 8. If all this were so, why did Marcion allege that the blind man’s faith was of so worthless4956 4956 Fidei equidem pravæ: see preceding page, note 3. a stamp? The fact is,4957 4957 Atquin. the Son of David so acted,4958 4958 Et hoc filius David: i.e., præstitit, “showed Himself good,” perhaps. that the Antithesis must lose its point by its own absurdity.4959 4959 De suo retundendam. Instead of contrast, he shows the similarity of the cases. Those persons who offended David were blind, and the man who now presents himself as a suppliant to David’s son is afflicted with the same infirmity.4960 4960 Ejusdem carnis: i.e., infirmæ (Oehler). Therefore the Son of David was appeased with some sort of satisfaction by the blind man when He restored him to sight, and added His approval of the faith which had led him to believe the very truth, that he must win to his help4961 4961 Exorandum sibi. the Son of David by earnest entreaty. But, after all, I suspect that it was the audacity (of the old Jebusites) which offended David, and not their malady.
Edersheim Bible History Lifetimes xi.ix Pg 312.1
VERSE (7) - :9 2Sa 5:8 Jer 5:10
|
|
PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE
|
