King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page

PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Genesis 14:7


CHAPTERS: Genesis 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50     

VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24

TEXT: BIB   |   AUDIO: MISLR - MISC - DAVIS   |   VIDEO: BIB - COMM


ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE


HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB

LXX- Greek Septuagint - Genesis 14:7

και 2532 αναστρεψαντες 390 5660 ηλθοσαν επι 1909 την 3588 πηγην της 3588 κρισεως 2920 αυτη 846 3778 εστιν 2076 5748 καδης και 2532 κατεκοψαν παντας 3956 τους 3588 αρχοντας 758 αμαληκ και 2532 τους 3588 αμορραιους τους 3588 κατοικουντας 2730 5723 εν 1722 1520 ασασανθαμαρ

Douay Rheims Bible

And they returned, and came to the fountain of Misphat, the same is Cades: and they smote all the country of the Amalecites, and the Amorrhean that dwelt in Asasonthamar.

King James Bible - Genesis 14:7

And they returned, and came to En-mishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites that dwelt in Hazezon-tamar.

World English Bible

They returned, and came to En Mishpat (the same is Kadesh), and struck all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites, that lived in Hazazon Tamar.

Early Church Father Links

Anf-03 iv.ix.iii Pg 5, Npnf-112 iv.xxxvi Pg 63, Npnf-210 iv.iii.iii Pg 206

World Wide Bible Resources


Genesis 14:7

Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

Anf-03 iv.ix.iii Pg 5
There is, if the text be genuine, some confusion here.  Melchizedek does not appear to have been, in any sense, “subsequent” to Abraham, for he probably was senior to him; and, moreover, Abraham does not appear to have been “already circumcised” carnally when Melchizedek met him. Comp. Gen. xiv. with Gen. xvii.

“But again,” (you say) “the son of Moses would upon one occasion have been choked by an angel, if Zipporah,1165

1165


Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 14

VERSE 	(7) - 

Ge 36:12,16 Ex 17:8-16 Nu 14:43,45; 24:20 1Sa 15:1-35; 27:1-12


PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE

God Rules.NET