Anf-02 vi.iv.iii Pg 217.1
Anf-02 vi.iv.iii Pg 264.1
Anf-03 v.iv.vi.vii Pg 34
Et Christus: Pamelius and Rigaltius here read “Christi apostolus.” Oehler defends the text as the author’s phrase suggested (as Fr. Junius says) by the preceding words, “Moses or Christ.” To which we may add, that in this particular place St. Paul mentions his injunction as Christ’s especially, οὐκ ἐγὼ, αλλ᾽ ὁ Κύριος, 1 Cor. vii. 10.
however, when He here commands “the wife not to depart from her husband, or if she depart, to remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband,”5503 5503
Anf-03 v.iv.vi.vii Pg 35
1 Cor. vii. 10, 11.
both permitted divorce, which indeed He never absolutely prohibited, and confirmed (the sanctity) of marriage, by first forbidding its dissolution; and, if separation had taken place, by wishing the nuptial bond to be resumed by reconciliation. But what reasons does (the apostle) allege for continence? Because “the time is short.”5504 5504
Edersheim Bible History
Sketches xi Pg 5.9
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 7
VERSE (10) - :12,25,40
