| |  |
PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - John 1:44
CHAPTERS: John 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 
VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51
TEXT: BIB | AUDIO: MISLR - MISC - DAVIS - FOCHT | VIDEO: GEN - BIB - COMM
ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE
HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB
|
LXX- Greek Septuagint - John 1:44 ην 2258 5713 δε 1161 ο 3588 φιλιππος 5376 απο 575 βηθσαιδα 966 εκ 1537 της 3588 πολεως 4172 ανδρεου 406 και 2532 πετρου 4074
Douay Rheims Bible Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
King James Bible - John 1:44 Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
World English Bible Now Philip was from Bethsaida, of the city of Andrew and Peter.
Early Church Father Links Anf-09 iv.iii.v Pg 21, Npnf-106 vi.v.xviii Pg 18, Npnf-106 vi.v.xviii Pg 26, Npnf-108 ii.LXXVIII Pg 90, Npnf-110 iii.XXXVII Pg 78, Npnf-114 iv.xxii Pg 0, Npnf-114 iv.xxii Pg 2, Npnf-114 v.xxii Pg 0, Npnf-114 v.xxii Pg 2
World Wide Bible Resources
John 1:44
Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325) Anf-03 v.ix.xxiv Pg 4
Ver. 8. Then the Lord answered him: “Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip?”8094 8094
Anf-01 ix.iv.xiv Pg 8
John xiv. 7, 9, 10. To these men, therefore, did the Lord bear witness, that in Himself they had both known and seen the Father (and the Father is truth). To allege, then, that these men did not know the truth, is to act the part of false witnesses, and of those who have been alienated from the doctrine of Christ. For why did the Lord send the twelve apostles to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,3533 3533
Anf-03 iv.ix.ix Pg 52
Comp. Bible :Heb.1.3">Ex. xxxiii. 20; John i. 18; xiv. 9; Col. i. 15; Heb. i. 3. And accordingly it is agreed that the Son of God Himself spake to Moses, and said to the people, “Behold, I send mine angel before thy”—that is, the people’s—“face, to guard thee on the march, and to introduce thee into the land which I have prepared thee: attend to him, and be not disobedient to him; for he hath not escaped1296 1296 Oehler and others read “celavit”; but the correction of Fr. Junius and Rig., “celabit,” is certainly more agreeable to the LXX. and the Eng. ver. thy notice, since my name is upon him.”1297 1297
Anf-03 v.ix.xxiv Pg 5
Ver. 9. Now whom does He say that they ought to have known?—for this is the sole point of discussion. Was it as the Father that they ought to have known Him, or as the Son? If it was as the Father, Praxeas must tell us how Christ, who had been so long time with them, could have possibly ever been (I will not say understood, but even) supposed to have been the Father. He is clearly defined to us in all Scriptures—in the Old Testament as the Christ of God, in the New Testament as the Son of God. In this character was He anciently predicted, in this was He also declared even by Christ Himself; nay, by the very Father also, who openly confesses Him from heaven as His Son, and as His Son glorifies Him. “This is my beloved Son;” “I have glorified Him, and I will glorify Him.” In this character, too, was He believed on by His disciples, and rejected by the Jews. It was, moreover, in this character that He wished to be accepted by them whenever He named the Father, and gave preference to the Father, and honoured the Father. This, then, being the case, it was not the Father whom, after His lengthened intercourse with them, they were ignorant of, but it was the Son; and accordingly the Lord, while upbraiding Philip for not knowing Himself who was the object of their ignorance, wished Himself to be acknowledged indeed as that Being whom He had reproached them for being ignorant of after so long a time—in a word, as the Son. And now it may be seen in what sense it was said, “He that hath seen me hath seen the Father,”8095 8095
Anf-03 v.ix.xxiv Pg 6
John xiv. 9. —even in the same in which it was said in a previous passage, “I and my Father are one.”8096 8096
Anf-03 v.ix.xx Pg 6
John xiv. 9, 10. They would have the entire revelation of both Testaments yield to these three passages, whereas the only proper course is to understand the few statements in the light of the many. But in their contention they only act on the principle of all heretics. For, inasmuch as only a few testimonies are to be found (making for them) in the general mass, they pertinaciously set off the few against the many, and assume the later against the earlier. The rule, however, which has been from the beginning established for every case, gives its prescription against the later assumptions, as indeed it also does against the fewer.
Npnf-201 iii.viii.xx Pg 3
Npnf-201 iii.viii.xx Pg 3
Edersheim Bible History Lifetimes viii.xxxi Pg 11.1, Sketches v Pg 7.4
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 1VERSE (44) - Joh 12:21; 14:8,9 Mt 10:3 Mr 3:18 Lu 6:14 Ac 1:13
|
|
PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE
|
