Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxviii Pg 32
Luke xx. 41–44.
what relation has this to Christ? David did not literally confute5011 5011 Non obtundebat.
an error of the Scribes, yet David asserted the honour of Christ, when he more prominently affirmed that He was his Lord than his Son,—an attribute which was hardly suitable to the destroyer of the Creator. But how consistent is the interpretation on our side of the question! For He, who had been a little while ago invoked by the blind man as “the Son of David,”5012 5012
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 20
VERSE (44) - Lu 1:31-35; 2:11 Isa 7:14 Mt 1:23 Ro 9:5 Ga 4:4 1Ti 3:16 Re 22:16
